Psychology

After watching the videos below on Jason Collins, the first NBA player to ever come out as gay, write a 3-paragraph minimum analysis. There are 2 videos because these are short videos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bP39V26gSEM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo46D7zUOCM

Read the article and identify any surprises you find; likewise, be sure to comment on anything you feel is missing in the information provided. This is not about expressing a personal opinion as much as integrating all that you have learned about assessment over the semester. Keep in mind the importance of ethical practice. Post your findings and discuss with your classmates the similarities and differences noted across the sources. In addition, make note of Christian worldview or biblical themes were appropriate. https://www.schoolcounselor.org/asca/media/asca/home/SCCompetencies.pdf

Please try your best. Write something about: First, when I entered high school as I am from a lower class family I didn’t have goals about attending college because of the money, but I’d passed so many obstacles that motivated me to get an education. Most of my family and I were affected due to the COVID 19, which made me realize to become a professional. Seeing my mom working so hard, everytime my mom returns from work says “omg I hate my job, they explote me, the manager treats me like a slave”. I want to study management because I’m interested in it and because I don’t want people to live what my mom lives everyday, I want to become a good leader, do the opposite that bad managers do. I grew up with my grandparents because my mom had to work all day, I’m thankful about that, I want to give my mom the life she deserves, and to make my family and mom proud. Also, because I don’t want my children to live what I lived growing up with their grandparents not because my mom didn’t love, but because she had to work all day because she was the head of the family. I don’t want to children to see his/her dad saying that my manager treats me like a slave, I want them to be proud of their dad about being a good manager that helps employees. In conclusion, write about hardship. Before I submit a payment let me revise it so you can add something else if missing.

Discuss the key concepts surrounding individual differences within personality and intelligence theory and research. Refer to the key theories within your discussion and provide a critical analysis. You must also demonstrate your competency in presenting your discussion your discussion in your essay and integrate your ideas effectively, reflecting on key research findings in support of your discussion.

using three other sources, apart from the class text (EBSCO, Google, article, book, etc).  The paper will need to be in APA style, typed, times new roman font, size 12, and double spaced. The paper should be about five-six pages in length (not including the title page, the page for the abstract, and reference page)The paper should be thoughtful and not a regurgitation and definition of terms.  You should provide a complete explanation of the importance/interest of the topic at hand.  In addition, provide background knowledge to help the reader understand the context of the topic at hand. Develop your ideas in a concise and clear manner using the text a source as well as outside resources. Organize your thoughts clearly with good transitions statements.  Employ good usage of grammar.

write an overview of the movie GLASS and end the essay with your personal commentary on the importance of psychology in the field of medicine, the relevance of recognizing individual differences and the value of identifying someone who might require follow-up or psychological accompaniment. 2 PAGE MAX

Part One Freud started his theoretical postulations by studying patients with hysterical or conversion reactions. This led to his realization that his patients had conscious and unconscious aspects of memory. Why was this realization significant? How did this influence the development of the field of psychology? Explain. (250 words) Part Two What is the relationship between Freud’s notion of a “secondary system” and his abandonment of the “seduction hypothesis?” Do you believe his abandonment of the “seduction hypothesis” was the right choice for future of psychology? Why or why not? (250 words)

Week’s topic: Psychological Treatments, Social Thinking and Social Influences Current Event Analysis 3:  In assignment, you will  analyze one current event through key psychological concepts from Chapters 15-16.  To complete this assignment, you will: (a) find a topic related to the topic of the chapter’s week and important issues in our world today, (b) research the topic and write a 500 word analysis surrounding how the article has psychological influences, and (c) include a link to the article or attach a copy.  Since this is a current events assignment you are to choose an article that is no more than 6 months old from the date the assignment is due.  You may only use articles from credible newspapers, magazines, or broadcast news media sources.  (i.e., some example concepts may include: nature vs. nurture, conditioning and learning, perception, psycho-social influence, psychological applications, etc.) Provide an analysis of your interpretations/findings. The following questions are a few examples of what to address: What psychological words or phrases appear repeatedly in the current event article? Describe these concepts.   What problem(s) or issue(s) is being discussed or analyzed? How does it relate to the one of the psychological concepts from chapters 15-16 What does the current research say about the topic?  What does the historical research say about the topic?   The 500+ word analysis must include APA formatting: title page, 500+ word analysis, reference page.  See the “Announcements” section for APA expectations and academic research expectations.

The Ellie Nesler case was a very famous case in the national media and is appropriate for a group discussion activity. To review, Ellie Nesler, 41, shot and killed Daniel Driver in a Jamestown, California, courtroom on April 2, 1993. She smuggled the weapon into the courtroom and shot Driver five times. Driver had been on trial for molesting Nesler’s 6-year-old son. Read the facts of the case and then use the four tests of insanity to decide whether Nesler was guilty or insane. Provide your explanation. After looking up and reviewing results of the trial, do you think the verdict would still be applicable by todays standards? : Note also that the M’Naghten standard is used exclusively at the federal level, whereas the states have various standards and, in a few, there is no insanity defense at all.     Resources: Accused molester is killed in court. (April 4, 1993). The New York Times. [Online archive] http://www.nytimes.com/1993/04/04/us/accused-molester-is-killed-in-court.html (Links to an external site.)   Libby, T. (April, 2012). Hindsight: Ellie Nesler. California Lawyer. [Online journal] http://www.callawyer.com/Clstory.cfm?eid=921391 (Links to an external site.)   Ellie Nesler: Mother kills child molester in courtroom. (Sept 27, 2014). Examiner.com. http://www.examiner.com/article/ellie-nesler-mother-kills-child-molester-courtroom Includes a link to a short interview Oprah did with Nesler.   For this discussion you will submit a post that is between 400-500 words minimum. Using APA for both in text citations and works cited. You do not need a running header, page number, or abstract. You will answer the following post and back up your responses with reliable sources. Wikipedia is in no way a reliable source. You must have a minimum of three reliable sources.

For part one of this week’s assignment, you will revisit the six research articles (3 qualitative and 3 quantitative) that you found in Weeks 6 and 7 that addressed your PCF. Use these articles to practice the initial steps of the Evidence-based Practice (EBP) approach (see Appendix I in Williams, Patterson & Edwards, 2014.). For each article: ASK: Identify an important clinical question that can be addressed by the study. Decide whether the clinical question you articulated above is a who, what, where, when or why question and explain why this is the case. ACQUIRE:  Summarize the process you undertook to find this article (which is the process you will use to find future evidence). APPRAISE: Summarize the article’s strengths and any weaknesses/concerns related to internal and external validity, measurement, analyses, ethics, and any other relevant issues. APPLY: Discuss what you would take from this article to help you answer the clinical question you articulated above.  Then, evaluate the fit of this information with your experience to date, as well as your hypothetical client population, and clinical context.  In doing so, ensure you comment on: Whether the methods used for the study limit to whom the results of the study might apply (e.g., if the participants in this study were primarily inner city adolescents in foster care, does that mean the results will only apply to similar clients, or not?  Why or why not?). Whether the methods used for the study limit the context in which the results of the study might apply (e.g., if the study was carried out in an inpatient psychiatric treatment center in Sweden, does that limit their utility for outpatient clients in the US?  Again, why or why not?). ANALYZE AND ADJUST: Propose a few specific measures or ways that you might evaluate the effectiveness of your hypothetical treatment of clients using the information obtained in this study. In other words, how would you assess if the ways you might alter your therapy based on the information from this article were effective? For part two of this week’s assignment, review the six questions you proposed in Part I.  Repeat EBP step one (ASK) and articulate another clinical question related to your PCF that is of interest to you.  Complete step 2 (ACQUIRE) and find two additional research studies that you believe could provide an answer to that clinical question.  For each study, cut and paste the study abstract into your assignment document and then explain in 5-7 sentences why you think the results of this study would help you provide a reasonable answer to this new clinical question (essentially this comment will be a combined description of EBP steps three and four—APPRAISE and APPLY). Thus this part of the assignment will look like this: EBP Step 1 (ASK) This is a second clinical question I could ask related to my PCF: (e.g., “What is….” “How should therapists address X in therapy.?”) EBP Step 2 (ACQUIRE) I located two more research studies that can help me answer this clinical question. Abstract from Article 1: Abstract from Article 2: EBP Steps 3 and 4 (APPRAISE and APPLY) This is why I think the results of the study discussed in Article 1 would help me provide a reasonable answer to this new clinical question. This is why I think the results of the study discussed in Article 2 would help me provide a reasonable answer to this new clinical question.