Political science

Complete the Learn: Self-Assessment: Do You Have What it Takes to Be a Leader? exercise located in this week’s Learning Activities folder.Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:How would you define leadership?To the extent that leadership is an art, what methods come to mind for improving one’s “art of leadership” now?As you reflect on the results of your self-assessment, do you believe you have what it takes to lead in the workplace? Why or why not?Do you think people need growth and development to become more inclusive leaders? Why or why not?How could you coach or mentor aspiring leaders to better appreciate diversity and inclusion?

Write a paper addressing conflict intervention and recommendations for the Patton family conflict that is at least 700 words. Before starting the paper, the team will have to identify the issues facing the Patton family. You may use the case study found in the Week Two materials as a resource.Use Ch. 14, 15 and 16 of The Mediation Process to help guide the responses to the following statements and questions in your paper.Will you address every issue?Will resolution of some issues help resolve other issues? Explain.Do you see a logical solution to the major issues?Explain how this solution address the major issues presented by the parties.How will you explore this idea(s)/solution(s) without suggesting/advising the partiesDescribe the areas you feel support a compromise or collaboration?The Patton family case study is attached

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:What are the ethical and practical issues that complicate the use of alternative dispute resolution techniques? How can these be overcome or minimized? Explain and provide specific examples to support your rationale.

Answer ONE essay from EACH GROUP (for a total of two). Each essay should be 3-4 pages, typed, double-spaced, and rigorously apply a standard academic source citation style. Be sure to address all aspects of the questions, to relate your answers carefully to course material and any other supporting evidence. You should submit this as a single Word document, and you can used a combined Bibliography or Works Cited at the end of the two essays. Please note: Your answers should not overlap significantly with previous written work for the class (e.g., past Response Papers). These midterm essays are due in the Moodle submission portal by Wednesday, March 17, by 12:00 noon (Wooster time).Group I: Answer ONE of the following questions (worth 50 points): 1. What is a disaster, and how should governments respond to them? Develop a detailed essay that firstdefines disasters and draws strong connections to course readings and theories. Next, critically analyze the political and moral implications to respond to disasters that flow from such a definition. For the last third of your essay, apply these arguments to analyze developments in the Iceland-Z crisis simulation2. What does the theory of bureaucratic politics tell us about disaster response? What are the implications ofSchneider’s arguments about bureaucratic and emergent norms in this context? For the last third of your essay, apply Schneider’s framework to analyze developments in the Iceland-Z crisis simulation.3. Critically analyze all dimensions of the following claim: “Democracies provide the most effectiveresponses to disasters.” Develop a detailed essay incorporates arguments from Tilly, Hannigan, Fenner, Kleinfeld, and others to speak to this question. Finally, relate these arguments to our experiences in the Iceland-Z crisis simulation.4. Which is more essential to effective disaster response—leadership or public trust—and why? Develop anessay in which you champion one of these dimensions over the other based on your studies of comparative public policy, and draw in detailed examples and arguments from course material. How did these perspectives inform your experiences in the Iceland-Z crisis simulation?Group II: Answer ONE of the following questions (50 points): 5. Develop an essay that compares and contrasts the following two comparative public policy theories:Punctuated Equilibrium Theory and the Advocacy Coalition Framework theory. What are the primary arguments or assumptions of these theories? Who are the most important actors that they study? How are they similar or different? Finally, describe how one of these theories works to provide sound analysis in a mini-case study.6. Which is a more serious disaster: COVID-19 or climate change—and why? Develop a carefully constructed comparative public policy analysis of this question by drawing on arguments from Dodds, Hannigan, Harrison, and other readings.

Environment & the Challenges of Global GovernanceConsidering the readings, video presentations, and your own research, draft a quality 6–7 pg. research paper on a particular global environmental challenge with at least region-wide if not wider significance. Discuss your selection in accordance with the following prompts, answering in a separate or integrated manner as you wish:· Reasoning with clear ideas and examples and using chapter 11????12 challenges as a backdrop, what is the nature and scope of the environmental problem you selected? What caused the problem and what justifies it as a global rather than local concern? If the problem seems more local or even regional than global, what aspects of the problem make its urgency appealing to global institutions, states, or individuals that effectively run these institutions?· Reasoning with clear ideas and examples, explain why the issue is difficult to resolve with collective action of any kind—local, regional, global. Who or what are the main obstacles to mitigating, ameliorating, or even solving the problem you identify?· Many Christians on a spectrum from left to right consider themselves ‘environmentalists’ at some level, from supporting nature preserves, national parks, and clean air and water to global agendas like climate change, pollution reduction, and population control. Using biblical and extra-biblical sources (The Bible, commentaries, teachings, other writings, etc.) to inform your own reasoning, explain how a consistent Christian worldview may be compatible with the label ‘Christian environmentalist.’ Be clear and coherent in your response, since you want to avoid Bible verses at random with little integrated rele

Essay: The United Nations SystemsInstructionsPrint Start WritingThe United Nations Security Council is the world’s primary body for maintaining international peace and security through a multilateral institution. It is the only organization within the United Nations system that has the authority to make binding decisions and to enforce those decisions through the use of force. Yet the Security Council has long been criticized for its ineffectiveness and outdated membership structure.Recall that the structure of the United Nations Security Council reflects the distribution of political power at the end of World War II. The Security Council has five permanent members (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) and ten non-permanent members elected by the General Assembly on a geographic basis for a two year term. Security Council resolutions must be approved by 9 of the 15 members, and a no vote by any of the permanent members automatically defeats any resolution (the veto power).Suppose you were asked to recommend changes in the structure of the Security Council—particularly with respect to its membership composition and voting structure—intended to make the organization more effective. What changes would you propose? What obstacles to your proposed reform might you anticipate?( 500 – 700 wors)

Although international norms concerning human rights are becoming stronger, China and many other states continue to consider human rights an internal affair over which the state has sovereignty within its territory. Do you think human rights issues are a legitimate subject for one state to raise with another? If so, how do you reconcile the tensions between state autonomy and universal rights? What practical steps could be taken to get sovereign states to acknowledge universal human rightsminimum 150 wo

Students must pick one of the debate topics to write a 3-5 term paper on. Students will receive points for this assignment by either writing either an e-mail or a Canvas message to the professor by the due date. Students who do not will receive zero (0) points for this assignmentTopic: Should drug enforcement be left to the states?

Enforcement of drug laws is one of the many areas that both the federal government and state governments share. However, for over a decade, states have been legalizing either medicinal marijuana, or recreational marijuana, or both. With states moving towards increased legalization, but the federal government either unwilling or unable to change its own laws around drugs, some have argued that the federal government should leave overall enforcement to the states. Others have argued that the federal government needs to set a single standard for drug enforcement that all citizens should respect. Which do you agree with?Students must read the six articles in the above link from the NY Times and vote on whether or not they agree, disagree, or are undecided. At the same time, students must vote on whether they agreed, disagreed, or were undecided on the debate question.

From the weekly readings, analyze the key influences that the theoretical and practical aspects of public leadership may exert upon a public leader’s performance. Provide two examples of these influences to support your response.From the weekly readings, predict two or three challenges that public leaders will face regarding the future of public leadership. Provide a rationale for your response.