Political science

Write an essay in response to the prompt given below. The essay should be around 1,500 words (please use 12-point font, 1-inch margins, and double spacing).· Your answer should rely primarily on the material covered in the lectures, supplemented by the assigned readings. Do not do outside research for this essay or bring in outside sources, but you may (and are encouraged to) consult and quote any of the sources (readings and/or lectures) we have used in the course so far.Prompt:While scholars of world politics have long emphasized its anarchic structure, there also exist clear elements of hierarchy in the international system, particularly between the rich, developed countries of the Global North and the poor, developing countries of the Global South. The difference between the Global North and South has been institutionalized in various ways in contemporary global governance, and these two groups of states often have widely divergent views on the purpose, justice and value of different governance arrangements, a fact which often complicates the creation and implementation of effective global policies.Discuss how the economic and political inequalities between the North and South are manifested in three global governance regimes: the nuclear non-proliferation regime, the climate change regime, and the regime governing global development. Your answer should consist of three parts. In the first part, identify the different rights and responsibilities enjoyed by the North and South in all three regimes. Then, discuss the costs and benefits that these unequal rights and responsibilities generate for the management of these three global problems. What tensions exist between the Global North and South in these regimes and how do these tensions weaken the regime’s effectiveness? Finally, suggest some possible reforms to each regime that could better address the inequities in the relationship between the North and South in the practice of global governance. Be as specific as possible in offering your recommendations.

General Information: This assignment requires students to evaluate a question that does not have a definitive answer. Specifically, students will write an argument as to how the Supreme Court would rule on the inclusion of the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance if the issue were to be brought before it again.This is an area that people have strong opinions. Having said this, your personal opinion is NOT important for this assignment. Instead, it is your understanding of the Court’s approach to this area of constitutional interpretation to determine whether they would rule “under God” fails or passes the Lemon Test. Students should carefully study Patterson’s discussion of the Establishment Clause and the following court cases using Oyez prior to beginning the assignment:Engle v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962)Abington School District v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963)Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38 (1985)Locke v. Davey, No. 021315 (2004)Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677 (2005)McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union of Ky., 545 U.S. 844 (2005)How to Write a Critical Evaluation of the Establishment Clause: Critical thinking is the “ability to interpret, analyze, synthesize, or evaluate information, issues, and ideas and apply creative thought to formulate a substantive opinion, solve a problem or reach a conclusion.” In order to evaluate this question from a more critical perspective, i.e. use information appropriately to investigate a point of view or conclusion, students should format their paper in the following manner:Introduction: this is a paragraph where students should introduce the topic and state their thesis (argument). The thesis should be confined to a single sentence at the end of the introduction. This paragraph should be no more than five sentences long.Analysis: The body of your essay focuses on the argument stated at the end of your Introduction. If you make the argument that the Supreme Court would find “under God” to be constitutional, then you must explain why this inclusion passes all THREE parts of the Lemon Test and support this argument using three distinct court cases, i.e. this section should have approximately three paragraphs (one per test). If you make the argument that the Supreme Court would find “under God” to be unconstitutional, on the other hand, then you must explain why this inclusion fails at least ONE part of the Lemon Test and support this argument using one court case, i.e. this section will have a minimum of one paragraph.Revolving your answer around the relevant course material represents the key to your analysis. Your argument must derive from your understanding of the relevant course material, i.e. the Lemon Test and court cases, and should be logical and centered on facts. In other words, students should not only summarize Patterson or court cases, but explain why this particular court case is relevant to the question at hand. This explanation is critical as it demonstrates to readers why this particular case supports your claim. In addition, students should refrain from using outside sources.Conclusion: The final paragraph is not a time to restate your thesis or the main ideas already discussed in the essay. Instead, a good conclusion emphasizes the significance of your analysis and nicely ‘wraps up’ the argument of your paper. Conclusions should be approximately four or five sentences in length.One final note, students are encouraged to reference the rubric attached to this assignment for a more detailed grading breakdown for the assignment.Turning in the Assignment: After completing the assignment, upload a DOC, DOCX, or PDF file to Brightspace no later than April 11 at 11:59 PM. Email or Google Doc submissions will not be accepted under any circumstances. If you have questions about how to upload a file please take a look at How to Submit a Written Assignment in Blackboard.

While not being political, during the current pandemic, a point was made in the media that the Trump Administration eliminated the White House Health and Security Office. Some individuals have claimed that this elimination resulted in the lack of preparedness of the US. But is that true?FACTS: The National Security Council staff is supposed to help the president coordinate the government response to international crises and homeland security issues, by identifying emerging problems and making sure Cabinet agencies and other departments are working cooperatively.After Barack Obama became president in January 2009, he eliminated the White House Health and Security Office, which worked on international health issues. However, after multiple issues arose with the 2014 Ebola epidemic, President Obama established a Directorate for Global Health Security and Biodefense at the NSC in 2016. This directorate had its own staff and was headed by an individual who no longer reported to the President but to the national security adviser.This structure survived during the early part of the Trump’s Administration, when the office was headed by Rear Adm. Timothy Ziemer. After John Bolton became the national security adviser, he decided the organizational chart was a mess and led to too many conflicts. He also thought the staff was too large, having swollen to 430 people, including staffers in the pipeline.Bolton reorganized the directorate and eliminated a number of deputy national security advisers so there was just one. And he folded the global health directorate into a new one that focused on counterproliferation and biodefense. Bolton thought there was obvious overlap between arms control and nonproliferation, weapons of mass destruction, terrorism, and global health and biodefense. Morrison, who headed the combined office beginning in July 2018, was named Deputy Assistant to the President and thus had more clout and access than the head of the previous Directorate under Obama.One can see the dueling narratives between the Obama and Trump administrations, neither entirely incorrect. The office — as set up by Obama — was folded into another office in the Trump Administration. Thus, one could technically claim the office was eliminated. But the staff slots did not disappear, and the key mission of team remained a priority. So, one can also claim nothing changed. The positions that made up the old unit still are filled within the NSC and their funding was actually increased under Trump. Morrison answered directly to the President and could get things quickly to his attentionQuestion: The real change between the Obama and Trump Administrations was a philosophical one. Under the Obama policy, epidemics and pandemics were treated as global health issues that could be addressed through international diplomacy, transparency, and international cooperation. By improving healthcare in third world countries, it was believed that outbreaks could be prevented. Under the Trump policy, it was felt that the epidemiology of a biological health emergency is virtually identical to a bioterrorism attack. As a result, during 2018, the NSC merged three directorates into one to create a seamless interaction between those preparing for biological threats, regardless of whether they are man-made or naturally occurring.You are now the advisor to the President, based on what you have learned in the BSBD program, which approach do you agree with (or maybe something different). Based on your concept, argue with all of your passion why this should be the US policy. How would you implement your approach, who would you use as advisors (expertise not names), how would you maintain the National Strategic Stockpile and prioritize what goes into it

I need 6 full pages eachI need these assignments for 2 different students with the same teacher so you will give me 2 different copies, YOU NEED TO CHOOSE 2 DIFFERENT SUBJECT FOR EACH ONE.FOLLOW THESE INSTRUCTIONSEssay 2: Logos, Ethos, PathosWrite a six-full-page essay on a debatable topic of your choice in which you effectively use logos, ethos, and pathos to support your claim. Your purpose is to persuade your audience. Use clear language.For logos, include facts from sources, possibly numbers, to show the scope of what you are talking about: how much money involved, how many people affected. . . .Ethos comes through the credibility of the sources you quote. Use credible sources. Direct quotations seem more real than indirect quotations, but limited use of indirect quotations can save space and time. You might also draw on your own special knowledge of something, such as your life experience, your hobby, your sport, if it is relevant and out of the ordinary.Pathos gets a bit extra emphasis in this essay. It depends on concrete, sensory detail. For pathos, use moving stories of individuals: one person, one animal, one town.(Notice the difference between logos and pathos:logos: “Every year, there are 1.5 million evictions in the United States.”pathos: “Mary Smith was holding a baby in each arm when the marshals knocked on her door that cold January morning in Fairbanks, Alaska.”)Type your essay in MLA formatActions, including a Works Cited page. Make your essay as meaningful as you can.Rubric?Refer to the Essay 1 rubric generally. Specific to this essay: here is essay one rubric I don’t know if you will need it or not https://www.homeworkmarket.com/questions/rogerian-argument-essaysAn “A” essay will include moving examples or stories of individual people, animals, towns, or the like.An “A” essay will have direct quotations with sources properly cited and an orderly Wor

The analysis of the international and regional assistance in post-conflict reconstruction of Afghanistan. 3000 Words on Chicago Style.

Critical ThinkingPlease read Case 2: “Venezuela under Hugo Chávez and Beyond” available in your e-book (page no.611), and answer the following questions:Assignment Question(s): (Marks: 05)1. Under Chávez’s leadership, what kind of economic system was put in place in Venezuela? How would you characterize the political system? (word limit: 100, Marks: 02)2. During the Chávez years, many foreign multinationals exited Venezuela or reduced their exposure there. What do you think the impact of this has been on Venezuela? What needs to be done to reverse the trend? (word limit: 100, Marks: 02)3. By 2016, Venezuela’s economy appeared to be on the brink of total collapse. What do you think needs to be done to reverse this? (word limit: 150, Mark: 01))Answer:

Complete the Learn: Self-Assessment: What is Your Level of Emotional Intelligence? exercise located in this week’s Learning Activities folder.Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:As you reflect on the results of your self-assessment, do you believe you have the emotional intelligence to be a successful leader? Why or why not?Which Big Five OCEAN personality traits, intelligence components, or emotional-intelligence (EQ) components do you think will assist you in being a more inclusive leader?As you think of all the ineffective leaders you have ever worked for or played on sports teams for, did they possess a common attribute that caused them to be ineffective?How portable or non-portable are skills associated with being an inclusive leader?

I have to write a Bill about public and enviromental health, it could be about any issue the USA is currently facing.I was thinking about something that could help/improve the national biodiversity, that could conserve part of the U.S. lands and waters to protect the environment and address climate change by 2030 and other goals necessary to reduce the threats to biodiversity, specially for the upcoming generations.

Worth 10 points.Answer the following short answer questions in short paragraphs comprised of complete sentences.Format: Create a Word Document, with your name, course number, and date.The answers should be in your own words, double spaced and in times new roman font 12.If you use outside sources to complete your answers, then site the source to avoid plagiarism through the use of in-text citations and in a separate Works Cited page. Otherwise cite my lectures as these will definitely show up in Turnitin’s similarity report.Copying from the textbook or cutting and pasting sections from websites or other reference materials or presenting someone else’s ideas as your own is plagiarism and will not be tolerated and will result in zero (0) points for that assignment.Submit the finished Questions by submitting them via the Turnitin link below.1. What is Collective Security and how did this concept limit US overt military interventions in Latin America?2. What was the significance of the Truman Doctrine and how did it establish rules of engagement/confrontation between the US and USSR? How did the Truman Doctrine influence US policy towards Latin America from 1945-1953?3. Explain why National Security Doctrines were established in Latin American Countries and how the National Security Doctrine play out in Chile?4. Explain the cyclical relationship of USSR support for guerrilla groups in Latin America during the periods 1959-62, 1962-1979, 1980-1989.5. Briefly explain how overtime the internal conflict in El Salvador led to a proxy war, and also explain, how this conflict finally ended.

Was the Was the genocidal conflict in Rwanda primarily a product of history or the result of contemporary political manipulations? Could it have been avoided?in Rwanda primarily a product of history or the result of contemporary political manipulations? Could it have been avoided?