Healthcare

Assignment Content Review your leadership structure, and identify the process by which you can propose a policy change and how that proposal would navigate through leadership to get approved.   Identify a policy in your organization that you think could be created or amended to improve organizational governance, operations, or compliance with federal or state regulations.   Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper that outlines your policy proposal ideas in which you do all of the following: Provide an analysis of how your policy change would improve the organization. Evaluate what changes in the organization would need to be made to implement the policy change. Explain how you would advocate for your policy change while using the approval processes in your organization. This includes advocating for your policy by employees and administration. Ask yourself “What’s in it for the other employees?” “What’s in it for the organization to approve my policy?” Please do not use direct quotes unless you know how to format them. Refer to the APA manual from Week 1 ***Make sure you have answered all the questions above.*** Academic Paper Includes the following: title page title of paper on page 2 5 space indent for paragraphs Intext citations throughout the paragraph. Intext citation is author’s last name and date within parenthesis Headings-Level I or Level II should be all that you need (see sample paper) Reference page-is its own page-this does not start at the end of the body of the paper but has its own page. References are to be APA formatted. Please refer to sample paper placed in Course Introduction and Materials Pages are number with title page being page 1   Cite 3 reputable references to support your assignment (e.g., trade or industry publications, government or agency websites, scholarly works, or other sources of similar quality).   Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.

For your final assignment, develop a PowerPoint presentation that clearly highlights your case. Draw from all that you have built upon throughout the five previous weeks. Include: A summary of your case with critiques Ethical and legal ramifications (be thorough) An assessment of both sides of the argument in your case Recommendations for change Evaluation of how you will use this information in the future At the end of your presentation, relate your case to your overall interpretation of the concepts learned in this course. Evaluate how the subject matter of this course affects your interests for further study in ethics and law. Cite any sources you used in the last slide of the presentation in APA format. To support your work, use your course and textbook readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format. Submission Detail Complete your PowerPoint presentation in 10–12 slides with comprehensive explanations in the notes pages of the presentation.

If you were the Governor , how would you handle the spreading of  COVID-19? How would you handle teachers and students possibly returning to for school year 2020-2021?  Please keep in mind the following things. (Parents need to return to work, and pay their bills), (teachers and students safety on all levels, elementary, middle, high school and college) ( the economy) (how to return Maryland or your state back  to normalcy) ( prisoners in confined spaces, and a need to free dangerous criminal due to COVID-19) (the safety of nurses and doctors)  (people wanting so badly to return to some form of normalcy that they do not wear masks)  (your family, friends, neighbors)    (business owners, losing their business, homes while trying to provide for their employees) ( the military in close confinements and their safety). Please keep in mind that you are trying to do what is in the best interest of an entire state.

A RIGHT TO EXPERIMENTAL DRUGS? This week, you learned about the rigorous process of clinical trials that test new drugs before being approved for treatment. The process, which involves three distinct phases of testing, takes a great deal of time, with some trials lasting many years. Before approval, patients not part of a clinical trial have limited or no access to experimental drugs, even though these drugs could be helpful and potentially save their lives. Early stages of research on a drug sometimes suggest that the drug could be effective in treating a certain disease. But without going through the full clinical trial process, doctors do not know if the drug is effective at all. The vast majority of experimental drugs turn out to be completely ineffective, and the drug might have very dangerous side effects. Therefore, do patients with no other treatment options, particularly those who are not able to participate in a clinical drug trial, have a moral right to unproven drugs? In other words, do these patients have a moral right to the same drugs available to patients who are participating in a clinical trial? Create an argument that explains and defends your view on this issue. In addition to reviewing your textbook, you are encouraged to locate additional resources in the Capella library, your public library, or authoritative online sites to provide additional support for your viewpoint. Be sure to weave and cite the resources throughout your work. Address the following points: Identify moral theories (from Week 1) and ethical principles (from Week 2) that help shed light on the ethical problems raised by expanded access and that best support your own position. Moral Theories: Week 1 Utilitarianism. Kantian moral theory (deontology). Ross’s ethics. Natural law theory. Ethical Principles: Week 2 Non-malfeasance. Beneficence. Utility. Principles of distributive justice. Autonomy. Explain how the principle of informed consent is relevant to the issue. Explain the costs and benefits of making unproven, unapproved experimental drugs available to patients not participating in clinical drug trials. Consider the costs and benefits not only to the individual patients who take these drugs but also potential costs and benefits to other patients. Articulate arguments using examples for and against offering pre-approved drugs to wider pools of patients. Support your view using ethical theories or moral principles (or both) that you find most relevant to the issue. Exhibit proficiency in clear and effective academic writing skills. Assignment Requirements Your paper should meet the following requirements: Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines. Length: 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point Competency 1: Articulate ethical issues in health care. Explain how the principle of informed consent is relevant to the issues. Explain the costs and benefits of offering unapproved experimental drugs to patients. Competency 2: Apply sound ethical thinking related to a health care issue. Identify relevant ethical theories and moral principles. Articulate arguments using examples for and against offering experimental drugs to wider pools of patients. Competency 5: Apply in text the standard writing conventions for the discipline, including structure, voice, person, tone, and citation formatting. Exhibit proficiency in clear and effective academic writing skills.

Using the South University Online Library or the Internet, research the two major study designs–cohort and case-control–used in health care research. Find a research article on any topic in health care. Based on your research, please address the following: Although cohort studies are very powerful, case-control studies tend to be more popular. Do you agree with the statement? Why or why not? How does the cohort study design differ from the case-control study design? What is essentially the main use or purpose of the cohort study design and case-control study design? When it is best to use the cohort study design and when is it best to use the case-control study design? What characteristics of cohort study design make it important in health care research? Cohort studies can be retrospective or prospective. What makes a cohort study retrospective or prospective? To support your work, use your course and textbook readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

Complexity of health care environment requires us to examine the leadership needs for advanced  practice nurse(APN) roles that are applicable for today and future. Using your own words define the Transformational or Transactional Leardershp;  theory  describe how you might use this leadership theory in your future APN role. Give example of the transformational or transactional leadership from your experience it has to be 250 words, APA 7th edition  and  Reference has to be within 3 years

Risk-Based Reimbursement For your assignment, a primary care physician is often reimbursed by Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) via capitation, fee-for-service, relative value scale, or salary. Capitation is considered as a risk based compensation. In an effort to understand the intricacies involved with physician reimbursement, particularly in an era of health care reform, identify and interview an expert in the field, such as: Hospital Administrator Managed Care Organization (MCO) executive Health care Consultant Legal Professional Assumption: MCOs use risk-based reimbursement for primary care physicians. Ask the following questions in the interview: What kind of risk do the MCOs assess? Does risk-based compensation limit the freedom of primary care physicians in any way in terms of patient care? Why or why not? How does the capitation model of reimbursement work? Do physicians generally prefer one model over the other? Why or why not? Why do HMOs prefer the prepaid, monthly premium? Is pay-for-performance a better model than existing models of compensation? Are there limitations to it as well?

For this assignment, you will be given the opportunity to explore the two main types of error reporting systems: mandatory and voluntary. Please compose a 1½-page essay (double-spaced), addressing the topics below: 1. Describe mandatory error reporting. You are welcome to give examples of such a system. Provide pros and cons of such a system.  2. Describe voluntary error reporting. You are welcome to give examples of such a system. Provide pros and cons of such a system.  3. Based on what you have found, which type of error reporting system do you believe works best? Why? Please compose a 1½-page (at least) paper addressing the previously described requirements. Your essay should follow APA Format, and be double-spaced, using 1” margins and a clear 12-point type font, such as Times New Roman or Arial. Any images, cover pages, or reference lists do not count towards the page count.

Describe Sentinel Surveillance ? In what circumstances is it used in epidemiology ? Instructions: APA FORMAT  Used Cited Sources Below  : APA FORMAT   Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012). Lesson 5: Public Health Surveillance Section 4: Identifying or Collecting Data for Surveillance. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/ophss/csels/dsepd/ss1978/lesson5/section4.html Add add add

Topic: Alzheimer’s disease Disciplinary Approaches: 1) biology 2) epidemiology 3) etiology 4) physiology  Sources: 20 peer reviewed sources (5 for each approach). Format: in-text and bibliography Citation format CSE, 8 double spaced pages, font style times new roman, font size 12. All other instructions are posted in file. To make it easier for you I have written and provided all 20 sources in the file (attached), which means that you don’t have to spend time looking for correct sources. – This assignment will be due in 30 hours: which is more than enough time to read all 20 sources and write the paper.  …… Please bid if you can do justice to this assignment and follow all instructions.  I am an old customer here and I usually get really good writers, but in last few weeks I had a few bad experiences that is why I want to make a few points clear… Before you bid. This is a time based assignment which means it must be written within due time.  Most importantly: Usually a few writers here write very bad papers and then ask for more attempts… they don’t follow instructions, ignore most important steps from the guidelines, and waste customers’ time which is not acceptable. Please be professional and write what customer instructed and to do justice with research papers please utilize the given time correctly and completely!! If accepted then bid. Thank You!