Criminal Law

The focus shall be placed upon a specific forensic practice which is  “latent fingerprints” currently undergoing great scrutiny per the working document.  1. Break down…. a) Abstract b) Problem Statement/Thesis c) Background/history/origins of specific forensic discipline you are examining. d) Requirement in field to be considered an “expert” e.g. formal education, professional education, time in practice, court qualifications. e) Citing of a minimum of three cases to include; case background, application of the specific forensic discipline in each case, case outcomes, practitioner and victim impacts directly related to application of the forensic discipline. f) Conclusion, YOUR summation and assessment regarding what the future out look is for the forensic practice you have chosen to examine. 5. Utilize a minimum of 5 references, one of which can be our WORKING DOCUMENT. You may use legal rulings, periodicals, and a maximum of 2 investigative news pieces (some of these might be serialized articles due to the depth of a particular case).

For this assignment you will choose one of three issues in the Criminal justice system: – incarceration rates – the war on drugs – technology and surveillance Your paper should cover the following: A detailed description of the issue (at least 3-4 pages)   – a detailed description of the issue to include why it exists  – describe the effect this issue has/had on society- a detailed description of the varied positions on the subject in society (no personal opinions-just info from research) Describe proposed solutions proposed those who oppose current policies on the issue (at least 1 & 1/2- 2 pages) Using info you learned about the issue you should describe any potential changes which could be made to policies on this issue or providing a strong justification of the issue (at least 1- 1& 1/2 pages) Format and grading: This paper should contain mostly summarized or paraphrased info – remember you still need citations for this infoMinimize use of direct quotes – if you use a direct quote you should have a significant explanation of its relevance (in your own words) APA formatting must be used

PLEASE READ BOTH ARTICLES AND ANSWER QUESTIONS! Columbine and other school shootings had an impact on many of us. What impact did any of them have on you, if any? What did you think are the reasons behind school shootings? After you answer these questions, read the following article. https://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/04/20/columbine.myths/ Did the news reporting on Columbine influence your opinion on school shootings? Are you surprised about the findings in the article? Given your readings from your text book and after reading this article, what do you think would be the best course of action in handling school violence? ————————————————————————————————————————————– https://www.thoughtco.com/karla-homolka-and-paul-bernardo-crimes-972716 Go to Karla Homolka – Child Rapist, Torturer and Killer article, and read about the case of Karla Homolka, a woman convicted of raping, drugging and torturing young women, including her sister. How would she be classified according to the MTC:R3 and the Groth typology? Why? Justify your position with facts as support. If necessary, conduct further research into the case. Be sure to use standard English grammar and spelling. Your response should be between 200 and 300 words.

Correctional facilities and your thoughts on how they are run.  Are they effective?  If not, why not? Advantages, disadvantages and if we started re-building them, what would you propose they look like?  How would you recommend we run them? What is the current number of people incarcerated in our country and what is the make up of inmates by gender, race and crimes they’ve been convicted of. 

Throughout the semester, we discussed several theories of crime and criminality as it pertains to white collar crime, each with their own strengths, weaknesses, and policy implications. They all attempt to explain the causes of white collar crime and what if anything we can do about it. Students should develop a thesis statement that concisely articulates the paper’s main point, while directing the reader to the content in the body of the essay. The body of the paper should cite specific theories, relevant material, concepts, authors, and research. Late papers will be accepted in accordance with the Faculty Expectation guidelines for late submissions. It will help to sequence your ideas through well-developed paragraphs with transitional statements/phrases, which will enhance the paper’s organization. Since essay responses will evolve from week-to-week, comparing and contrasting your position on each week’s topics will be a fruitful exercise that will help direct you to the root cause of white collar crime and what we can do about it.

200 words on each questions Week 2: Explain and discuss the expanding role of the patrol officers as criminal investigators. Week 3: Explain and discuss how to search and collect evidence from crime scenes. Week 4:Discuss and identify the different roles of crime scene technicians and crime laboratory personnel in criminal investigations. Week 5:  Discuss the legal issues and guidelines to be considered when conducting searches during criminal investigations. Week 6: Explain and provide case examples that demonstrate the importance of DNA in criminal investigations.

Compare and contrast the life histories of incarcerated women to incarcerated men. In what ways does gender matter in the lives of women who find themselves under the control of the criminal justice system?

Should a juvenile case ever be waived to or processed in the adult criminal courts? You must write a minimum 2 paragraphs.

Discuss the application of ethics in policy, and decision-making in the criminal justice system. Submit an annotated bibliography upon which your paper is to be based. This will act as the foundation of your research and guide your paper. Annotated bibliographies also gather the reference materials and help summarize the articles, books, etc. you will be using in your paper. Submit an annotated bibliography with at least seven (7) valid sources that you will use as the basis for your paper

write a thoughtful, professional response to one of the three following prompts: 1. If you could change one law that you think is unjust, wrong or ridiculous, what would it be and why? How would the world change for you and in general if this law was changed for the better? Instead of just using your opinion, be sure to support your argument with examples and logic. 2. Most of us know someone who has been involved in a court case, whether it be a civil suit, a divorce, or a criminal matter. Write about this person’s experience with the court system in as much detail as you can. You are also free to use something you personally have been through, and may conceal your identity with a pseudonym if you so choose. 3. Do you completely follow all laws? Discuss a time you’ve broken a criminal or traffic law, or at least a time you’ve thought about breaking one. Are there good reasons to break laws once in awhile? Where is your limit of what law you might consider breaking? HERE ARE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT: No citation or references required. Mostly personal opinion or experience. It must be a minimum of three pages, double spaced with one inch margins. There is no maximum. It must use correct and professional grammar, avoid jargon, and be simple and concise while still remaining professional.