WGU C 163 Strategic Leadership & Future Delivery Models HCAP Scores Discussion

WGU C 163 Strategic Leadership & Future Delivery Models HCAP Scores Discussion ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON WGU C 163 Strategic Leadership & Future Delivery Models HCAP Scores Discussion COMPETENCIES 7016.1.1 : Strategic Planning Process The graduate evaluates the components of strategic planning and integrates strategic planning within varied healthcare settings. WGU C 163 Strategic Leadership & Future Delivery Models HCAP Scores Discussion 7016.1.2 : Strategic Leadership Methods and Concepts The graduate evaluates the use of systems theory, organizational development theory, change management, and leadership concepts in the strategic planning process within evolving healthcare settings. 7016.1.3 : Evolving Trends in Healthcare and Nursing The graduate evaluates healthcare trends and adapts strategic planning process to meet the changing healthcare environment. 7016.1.4 : Effect of Technology on Healthcare The graduate evaluates the use of technology within the healthcare setting as it relates to the organization’s strategic plan. INTRODUCTION This assessment will require you to analyze a healthcare system’s survey data (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, or HCAHPS) and develop a strategic plan for improvement of organizational scores. The HCAHPS results posted on Hospital Compare, which is part of the government’s Medicare website, allow consumers to make fair and objective comparisons between hospitals and state and national averages on important measures related to the patient’s unique perspective of the care received. You will need to incorporate the most recent survey scores data analysis (including comparison scores/benchmarking), impact of scores (financial and quality), organizational structure/design, use of technology, and influential cultural and social/environmental factors into this project. You may select a method of presentation that involves either a media presentation or a business plan document that will provide a thorough analysis, a plan that includes stakeholder involvement, and a timeline for implementation, evaluation, and outcome measurement. WGU C 163 Strategic Leadership & Future Delivery Models HCAP Scores Discussion SCENARIO You are the newly appointed chief nursing officer of a hospital and have been tasked with improving the most recently reported HCAHPS score for the entire organization. The hospital board is requesting a detailed report, analysis, and plan to improve these results. You are instructed to complete the full data and impact analysis; develop a detailed strategic plan to improve the scores in all areas of the hospital, incorporating quality improvement, shared accountability, technology, care delivery model, and financial stability; propose a rapid implementation timeline; and outline the process of evaluation in an effective presentation that you will present at the next board meeting. REQUIREMENTS Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide. Professional Communications is a required aspect to pass this task. Completion of a spell check and grammar check prior to submitting your final work is strongly recommended. You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course. Create a multimedia presentation or business plan document in which you do the following: Note: If a multimedia presentation is selected, presenter notes must be included for each slide in order to fully cover the level of explanation, analysis, and discussion necessary. A. Provide the HCAHPS scores for a hospital of your choice. Note: Refer to the web link to find HCAHPS scores for various hospitals. B. Analyze the HCAHPS scores of your chosen hospital by doing the following: 1. Compare the scores to state and national averages. 2. Compare the scores to two other hospitals in the region. WGU C 163 Strategic Leadership & Future Delivery Models HCAP Scores Discussion 3. Compare the survey response rates to two other hospitals in the region. 4. Describe the hospital’s demographic patient population and services provided. 5. Discuss how the following environmental and community factors could potentially influence HCAHPS scores: a. cultural dynamics b. educational dynamics c. socioeconomic dynamics 6. Explain potential short- and long-term financial impact on the organization. a. Discuss potential impact on quality outcomes. C. Discuss the potential cause of the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores. D. Develop an organizational strategic plan to improve the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores throughout the organization by doing the following: 1. Explain how organizational change can help improve the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores. 2. Discuss the structure (i.e., framework), process (i.e., actions), and outcomes of the strategic plan. 3. Discuss how you would incorporate evidence-based practice and shared governance to improve organizational quality. 4. Explain methods you would use to incorporate concepts of shared accountability among patients, medical providers, payers (e.g., insurance providers, Medicare, Medicaid), and personnel. 5. Explain methods you would use to incorporate technology trends within healthcare. 6. Explain methods you would use to improve the care delivery system, including the topics of quality, cost, access, and patient-centered care. 7. Explain methods you would use to improve financial stability. WGU C 163 Strategic Leadership & Future Delivery Models HCAP Scores Discussion E. Develop an implementation plan and timeline for the strategic plan you developed in part D by doing the following: 1. Discuss key roles and responsibilities of stakeholders. 2. Discuss how you would ensure stakeholder accountability and involvement. 3. Discuss any training staff would need in order to implement the plan. 4. Outline a timeline for implementation of your plan, including periodic review checkpoints to measure progress. F. Discuss the process you would use to evaluate the success of the strategic plan, including the following: • method of measurement that would be used • evaluation of the timeline • method of analysis 1. Discuss how you would involve key stakeholders in the evaluation process. 2. Explain how the evaluation results will be communicated internally and externally. G. When you use sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format. Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in an assessment, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the assessment. WGU C 163 Strategic Leadership & Future Delivery Models HCAP Scores Discussion File Restrictions File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( ) File size limit: 200 MB File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z RUBRIC ARTICULATION OF RESPONSE (CLARITY, ORGANIZATION, MECHANICS) : UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides weak articulation of response. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides limited articulation of response. COMPETENT The candidate provides adequate articulation of response. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides substantial articulation of response. A : HCAHPS SCORES UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide the HCAHPS scores for the chosen hospital. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD Not applicable. MINIMALLY COMPETENT Not applicable. COMPETENT Not applicable. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides the HCAHPS scores for the chosen hospital. B1 : STATE AND NATIONAL AVERAGES UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide an appropriate comparison of the scores to state and national averages. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with no detail, of the scores to state and national averages. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with limited detail, of the scores to state and national averages. COMPETENT The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with adequate detail, of the scores to state and national averages. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with substantial detail, of the scores to state and national averages. B2 : COMPARISON TO OTHER HOSPITALS UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide an appropriate comparison of the scores to 2 other hospitals in the region. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with no detail, of the scores to 2 other hospitals in the region. WGU C 163 Strategic Leadership & Future Delivery Models HCAP Scores Discussion MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with limited detail, of the scores to 2 other hospitals in the region. COMPETENT The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with adequate detail, of the scores to 2 other hospitals in the region. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with substantial detail, of the scores to 2 other hospitals in the region. B3 : SURVEY RESPONSE RATES UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide an appropriate comparison of the survey response rates to 2 other hospitals in the region. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with no detail, of the survey response rates to 2 other hospitals in the region. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with limited detail, of the survey response rates to 2 other hospitals in the region. COMPETENT The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with adequate detail, of the survey response rates to 2 other hospitals in the region. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with substantial detail, of the survey response rates to 2 other hospitals in the region. B4 : DEMOGRAPHICS AND SERVICES PROVIDED UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a reasonable description of the hospital’s demographic patient population and services provided. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a reasonable description, with no detail, of the hospital’s demographic patient population and services provided. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a reasonable description, with limited detail, of the hospital’s demographic patient population and services provided. COMPETENT The candidate provides a reasonable description, with adequate detail, of the hospital’s demographic patient population and services provided. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a reasonable description, with substantial detail, of the hospital’s demographic patient population and services provided. B5A : CULTURAL DYNAMICS UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how cultural dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of how cultural dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores. WGU C 163 Strategic Leadership & Future Delivery Models HCAP Scores Discussion MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of how cultural dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of how cultural dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of how cultural dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores. B5B : EDUCATIONAL DYNAMICS UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how educational dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of how educational dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of how educational dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of how educational dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of how educational dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores. B5C : SOCIOECONOMIC DYNAMICS UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how socioeconomic dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of how socioeconomic dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of how socioeconomic dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of how socioeconomic dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of how socioeconomic dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores. B6 : FINANCIAL IMPACT UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of the potential short- and long-term financial impact on the organization. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of the potential short- and long-term financial impact on the organization. WGU C 163 Strategic Leadership & Future Delivery Models HCAP Scores Discussion MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of the potential short- and long-term financial impact on the organization. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of the potential short- and long-term financial impact on the organization. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of the potential short- and long-term financial impact on the organization. B6A : IMPACT ON QUALITY UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the potential impact on quality outcomes. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of the potential impact on quality outcomes. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the potential impact on quality outcomes. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the potential impact on quality outcomes. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of the potential impact on quality outcomes. C : CAUSE OF SCORES UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the potential cause of the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no support, of the potential cause of the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited support, of the potential cause of the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate support, of the potential cause of the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial support, of the potential cause of the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores. D1 : ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how organizational change can help improve the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no support, of how organizational change can help improve the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores. WGU C 163 Strategic Leadership & Future Delivery Models HCAP Scores Discussion MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited support, of how organizational change can help improve the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate support, of how organizational change can help improve the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial support, of how organizational change can help improve the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores. D2 : STRUCTURE, PROCESS, AND OUTCOMES UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the structure, process, and outcomes of the strategic plan. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of the structure, process, and outcomes of the strategic plan. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the structure, process, and outcomes of the strategic plan. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the structure, process, and outcomes of the strategic plan. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of the structure, process, and outcomes of the strategic plan. D3 : IMPROVING ORGANIZATIONAL QUALITY UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how to incorporate evidence-based practice and shared governance to improve organizational quality. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no support, of how to incorporate evidence-based practice and shared governance to improve organizational quality. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited support, of how to incorporate evidence-based practice and shared governance to improve organizational quality. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate support, of how to incorporate evidence-based practice and shared governance to improve organizational quality. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial support, of how to incorporate evidence-based practice and shared governance to improve organizational quality. D4 : SHARED ACCOUNTABILITY UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of methods that would be used to incorporate concepts of shared accountability among patients, medical providers, payers, and personnel. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of methods that would be used to incorporate concepts of shared accountability among patients, medical providers, payers, and personnel. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of methods that would be used to incorporate concepts of shared accountability among patients, medical providers, payers, and personnel. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of methods that would be used to incorporate concepts of shared accountability among patients, medical providers, payers, and personnel. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of methods that would be used to incorporate concepts of shared accountability among patients, medical providers, payers, and personnel. D5 : TECHNOLOGY TRENDS UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of methods that would be used to incorporate technology trends within healthcare. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of methods that would be used to incorporate technology trends within healthcare. WGU C 163 Strategic Leadership & Future Delivery Models HCAP Scores Discussion MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of methods that would be used to incorporate technology trends within healthcare. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of methods that would be used to incorporate technology trends within healthcare. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of methods that would be used to incorporate technology trends within healthcare. D6 : IMPROVE CARE DELIVERY SYSTEM UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of methods that would be used to improve the care delivery system, including the topics of quality, cost, access, and patient-centered care. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no support, of methods that would be used to improve the care delivery system, including the topics of quality, cost, access, and patient-centered care. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited support, of methods that would be used to improve the care delivery system, including the topics of quality, cost, access, and patient-centered care. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate support, of methods that would be used to improve the care delivery system, including the topics of quality, cost, access, and patient-centered care. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial support, of methods that would be used to improve the care delivery system, including the topics of quality, cost, access, and patient-centered care. D7 : IMPROVE FINANCIAL STABILITY UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of methods that would be used to improve financial stability. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no support, of methods that would be used to improve financial stability. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited support, of methods that would be used to improve financial stability. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate support, of methods that would be used to improve financial stability. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial support, of methods that would be used to improve financial stability. E1 : STAKEHOLDER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of key roles and responsibilities of stakeholders. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of key roles and responsibilities of stakeholders. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of key roles and responsibilities of stakeholders. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of key roles and responsibilities of stakeholders. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of key roles and responsibilities of stakeholders. E2 : STAKEHOLDER ACCOUNTABILITY UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how to ensure stakeholder accountability and involvement. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of how to ensure stakeholder accountability and involvement. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of how to ensure stakeholder accountability and involvement. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of how to ensure stakeholder accountability and involvement. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of how to ensure stakeholder accountability and involvement. E3 : TRAINING UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of training staff would need in order to implement the plan. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of training staff would need in order to implement the plan. WGU C 163 Strategic Leadership & Future Delivery Models HCAP Scores Discussion MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of training staff would need in order to implement the plan. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of training staff would need in order to implement the plan. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of training staff would need in order to implement the plan. E4 : PLAN IMPLEMENTATION UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not outline an appropriate timeline for implementation of the plan, including periodic review checkpoints to measure progress. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD Not applicable. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate outlines an appropriate timeline, with insufficient detail, for implementation of the plan, including periodic review checkpoints to measure progress. COMPETENT Not applicable. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate outlines an appropriate timeline, with sufficient detail, for implementation of the plan, including periodic review checkpoints to measure progress. F : EVALUATE THE STRATEGIC PLAN’S SUCCESS UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how to evaluate the success of the strategic plan, including the given points. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of how to evaluate the success of the strategic plan, including the given points. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of how to evaluate the success of the strategic plan, including the given points. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of how to evaluate the success of the strategic plan, including the given points. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of how to evaluate the success of the strategic plan, including the given points. F1 : INVOLVEMENT OF STAKEHOLDERS UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how to involve key stakeholders in the evaluation process. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of how to involve key stakeholders in the evaluation process. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of how to involve key stakeholders in the evaluation process. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of how to involve key stakeholders in the evaluation process. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of how to involve key stakeholders in the evaluation process. F2 : COMMUNICATION OF RESULTS UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how to communicate the evaluation results internally and externally. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of how to communicate the evaluation results internally and externally. MINIMALLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of how to communicate the evaluation results internally and externally. COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of how to communicate the evaluation results internally and externally. HIGHLY COMPETENT The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of how to communicate the evaluation results internally and externally. G : SOURCES UNSATISFACTORY/NOT PRESENT When the candidate uses sources, the candidate does not provide in-text citations and references. DOES NOT MEET STANDARD When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides only some in-text citations and references. MINIMALLY COMPETENT When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with major deviations from APA style. COMPETENT When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with minor deviations from APA style. HIGHLY COMPETENT When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with no readily detectable deviations from APA style, OR the candidate does not use sources. WGU C 163 Strategic Leadership & Future Delivery Models HCAP Scores Discussion Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Struggling to find relevant content? Order a custom essay on
WGU C 163 Strategic Leadership & Future Delivery Models HCAP Scores Discussion
Let our experts save you the hassle
Order Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with GPA Fix
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
We appreciate every review and are always looking for ways to grow. See what other students think about our do my paper service.
Medicine
Great job! Thank you.
Customer 452707, May 29th, 2022
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Great Work!
Customer 452767, November 18th, 2022
Other
Thank you for a well written paper!!!
Customer 452557, January 19th, 2022
Other
Awesome Work!
Customer 452587, February 24th, 2022
Communications
Thank you very much
Customer 452669, November 17th, 2021
Other
AWESOME
Customer 452813, June 30th, 2022
Nursing
Awesome work!!!!!!
Customer 452453, March 24th, 2021
Nursing
Thank you for a great paper.
Customer 452707, August 6th, 2022
Nursing
Thank you!!!
Customer 452557, June 26th, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Great Work!
Customer 452587, November 2nd, 2021
Nursing
I appreciate all the hard work. Thank you!
Customer 452525, August 13th, 2021
public speaking
The work was excelent and very professional.
Customer 452653, November 1st, 2021
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
error: Content is protected !!

Save More. Score Better. Use coupon code SPECIAL for a 15%discount