Grand Canyon UniversityNRS 493 Burnout in Critical Care Nurses Discussion

Grand Canyon UniversityNRS 493 Burnout in Critical Care Nurses Discussion ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Grand Canyon UniversityNRS 493 Burnout in Critical Care Nurses Discussion In collaboration with the approved course preceptor, students will identify a specific evidence-based topic for the capstone project change proposal. Students should consider the clinical environment in which they are currently employed or have recently worked. The capstone project topic can be a clinical practice problem, an organizational issue, a leadership or quality improvement initiative, or an unmet educational need specific to a patient population or community. The student may also choose to work with an interprofessional collaborative team. Grand Canyon UniversityNRS 493 Burnout in Critical Care Nurses Discussion Students should select a topic that aligns to their area of interest as well as the clinical practice setting in which practice hours are completed. Write a 500-750 word description of your proposed capstone project topic. Include the following: The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal. The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed. A description (providing a high level of detail) regarding the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project. Effect of the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project. Significance of the topic and its implications for nursing practice. A proposed solution to the identified project topic with an explanation of how it will affect nursing practice. You are required to cite to a minimum of eight peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice. Plan your time accordingly to complete this assignment. Grand Canyon UniversityNRS 493 Burnout in Critical Care Nurses Discussion the_burnout_of_critical_care_nurses.xl Course Code NRS-493 Class Code NRS-493-O501 Criteria Content Percentage 80.0% Project Topic for Focus of Change Proposal 5.0% Setting or Context Where Project Topic Is Observed 10.0% Detailed Description of Project Topic 15.0% Effect of Identified Problem or Issue 15.0% Topic Significance and Implications for Nursing Practice 15.0% Proposed Solution for Identified Project Topic and Implications for Nursing Practice 15.0% Peer-Reviewed Articles 5.0% Organization, Effectiveness, and Format 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 2.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 3.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval Unsatisfactory (0.00%) The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is omitted. The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is omitted. A description of the project topic is omitted. Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is omitted. Significance of topic and its implications for nursing practice is omitted. A proposed solution to the identified project topic with an explanation of how it will affect nursing practice is omitted. Fewer than six peer-reviewed articles are presented. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 60.0 Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is presented but is largely incomplete. The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is presented but is largely incomplete. A description of the project topic is presented but is largely incomplete.Grand Canyon UniversityNRS 493 Burnout in Critical Care Nurses Discussion Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is presented but is largely incomplete. Topic is presented but criteria are incomplete. Topic is presented but criteria are incomplete. Fewer than seven peer-reviewed articles are presented. Overall, only five articles meet the assignment criteria. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (79.00%) The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is summarized. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed. The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is summarized. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed. A description of the project topic is presented. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed. Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is summarized. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed. Topic and most criteria are presented. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed. Topic and most criteria are presented. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed. Eight peer-reviewed articles are presented. Overall, only six articles meet the assignment criteria. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Grand Canyon UniversityNRS 493 Burnout in Critical Care Nurses Discussion Good (89.00%) The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. A description of the project topic is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Topic and criteria are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Topic and criteria are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support. Eight peer-reviewed articles are presented. Overall, only seven articles meet the assignment criteria. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident. The setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is logically presented. Support and rationale are evident. A detailed description of the project topic is clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident. Effect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident. Topic and criteria are clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident. Topic and criteria are clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident. Comments Eight peer-reviewed articles are presented, and each article clearly meets the assignment criteria. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned … Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10