Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study Paper

Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study Paper ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study Paper In addition to the attached articles (must reference), use the attached completed chart (attached) about “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” as the basis for responses in this assignment. Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study Paper Please use the sections as sub-headings to organize the paper. Please watch for the word count limits. Base your arguments on sound reasoning and authoritative sources Answer the following questions about a patient’s spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview. 1.In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient’s autonomy? Explain your rationale. 2.In 400-500 words, respond to the following: How ought the Christian think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence in James’s care? 3.In 200-250 words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike determine appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care? 4.Explain in detail the diagnosis in this Case Study While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines phi_413v_rs_t3t5casestudyhealingandautonomy.docx aligning_ethics.pdf making_the_case_for_ethical_decision_making.pdf phi_413v_case_study_ch Applying the Four Principles: Case StudyPart 1: Chart (60 points)Based on the “Healing and Autonomy” case study, fill out all the relevant boxes below. Provide the information by means of bullet points or a well-structured paragraph in the box. Gather as much data as possible. Medical Indications Beneficence and Nonmaleficence Patient Preferences Autonomy · Medical diagnosis is made in the case of patients as a way of identifying healthcare issues.· Taking diagnosis results to decide the treatment plan is part of ensuring non-maleficence so that patients are not subjected to harm· With beneficence, the parents and doctors act in the best interest of James.· Parents of James are interested in taking the option they think will be suitable for him to get healed.· They are in no way harming him through their faith in prayers.· They take a doctor’s recommendation as a way of ensuring he gets better. · Patients are supposed to make their decisions without any version influences (Beever & Brightman, 2016).· James is a kid. Hence it’s the role of the parents to decide on his behalf.· James does not resist the decisions meaning he agrees with the decision.· The physician does not oppose the decision of the patents but offers them a guide. Quality of Life Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy Contextual Features Justice and Fairness · Quality of life is connected to the traits of the treatment options for the patients (Carr & Winslow, 2017).· James on dialysis is set to improve on health compared to the condition before.· There is a dilemma on whether the brother should donate the kidney, or they should rely on faith for James to heal.· Parents need to make a consultation with James on the matter of getting a transplanted kidney from the brother. · Features of justice include legal, familiar setting and social aspects in medical choices (Gillon, 2018).· James’ parents are driven by their faith in making decisions on medical choices.· Parents are willing to donate their kidneys rather than involving their other son as a -way of fairness.Since only their son can donate in the family, they can allow volunteers. Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study Paper Part 2: EvaluationAnswer each of the following questions about how principlism would be applied: In 200-250 words answer the following: According to the Christian worldview, which of the four principles is most pressing in this case? Explain why. (45 points) In the Christian view, beneficence is more pressing than any other form of principle. The laws are connected with kindness, charity, and mercy towards others. The principles are made in the moral obligation of the person towards other people. The moral imperative is observed in the case of the James story, where they have a high level of beneficence towards James. Doing the right thing is considered as one of the best imperative in Christian views. Parents are acting to ensure that James recovers are expected, but they do it in a better and excellent way. They are driven by a high level of faith that they believe he will be recovering. They are highly believing and hopeful that through their Christian faith, James will be healed by the prayers. Thus, they take a step to make the son to a priest before his conditions worsen later. They opt for the dialyses which turn out to be late according to the doctor. Choosing to offer their kindness is part of beneficence (Gillon, 2018). The preference for prayers was a big part of choosing faith instead of the treatment. Despite their son’s health deterioration, it would be wrong to create blame as they had taken the option out of faith. In 200-250 words answer the following: According to the Christian worldview, how might a Christian rank the priority of the four principles? Explain why. (45 points) In ranking the four principles, beneficence will be ranked first in the list. It will then be followed by non-maleficence. The third position in the rank will include justice. Finally, anatomy comes last in the list principles. In consideration of family care towards their children, people will always first show love and kindness to their children (Pipien, 2018). Such aspects are a significant part of the principle of beneficence. The non-maleficence is depicted through the parent’s effort to keep the children safe, and no harm comes to them. Parents not considering Samuel for the donation of a kidney at first shows they mind him. At the same time, seeking alternatives to have James healed is in the best interest of ensuring no harm comes to their son. Christians are expected to have a great practice of fairness as part of justice towards others. Likely, they do so in all their experiences and encounters with others. In ensuring the anatomy principle, the Christians need to allow others the freedom and chances in making decisions that they are comfortable with (Kaldjian, 2019). The hospital allows the parents of James to make decisions as they plan from their decisions without any form of coercion. Thus, it supports the principle of anatomy in healthcare application. Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study Paper References:Beever, J., & Brightman, A. O. (2016). Reflexive principlism as an effective approach for developing ethical reasoning in engineering. Science and engineering ethics , 22 (1), 275-291.Carr, M. F., & Winslow, G. R. (2017). From conceptual to concrete. In World Religions for Healthcare Professionals (pp. 31-45). Routledge.Gillon, R. (2018). Principlism, virtuism, and the spirit of oneness. In Healthcare Ethics, Law and Professionalism (pp. 45-59). Routledge.Kaldjian, L. C. (2019). Purpose and Providence: An Outline for Christian Practical Wisdom in Health Care. Christian bioethics: Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality , 25 (2), 169-191.Pipien, I. (2018). Beneficence and nonmaleficence in care. Soins; la revue de reference infirmiere , 63 (824), 51-54. Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more

Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study Paper

Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study Paper ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study Paper In addition to the attached articles (must reference), use the attached completed chart (attached) about “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” as the basis for responses in this assignment. Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study Paper Please use the sections as sub-headings to organize the paper. Please watch for the word count limits. Base your arguments on sound reasoning and authoritative sources Answer the following questions about a patient’s spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview. 1.In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient’s autonomy? Explain your rationale. 2.In 400-500 words, respond to the following: How ought the Christian think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence in James’s care? 3.In 200-250 words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike determine appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care? 4.Explain in detail the diagnosis in this Case Study While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines phi_413v_rs_t3t5casestudyhealingandautonomy.docx aligning_ethics.pdf making_the_case_for_ethical_decision_making.pdf phi_413v_case_study_char Applying the Four Principles: Case Study Part 1: Chart (60 points)Based on the “Healing and Autonomy” case study, fill out all the relevant boxes below. Provide the information by means of bullet points or a well-structured paragraph in the box. Gather as much data as possible. Medical Indications Beneficence and Nonmaleficence Patient Preferences Autonomy · Medical diagnosis is made in the case of patients as a way of identifying healthcare issues. · Taking diagnosis results to decide the treatment plan is part of ensuring non-maleficence so that patients are not subjected to harm Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study Paper · With beneficence, the parents and doctors act in the best interest of James. · Parents of James are interested in taking the option they think will be suitable for him to get healed. · They are in no way harming him through their faith in prayers. · They take a doctor’s recommendation as a way of ensuring he gets better. · Patients are supposed to make their decisions without any version influences (Beever & Brightman, 2016). · James is a kid. Hence it’s the role of the parents to decide on his behalf. · James does not resist the decisions meaning he agrees with the decision. · The physician does not oppose the decision of the patents but offers them a guide. Quality of Life Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy Contextual Features Justice and Fairness · Quality of life is connected to the traits of the treatment options for the patients (Carr & Winslow, 2017). · James on dialysis is set to improve on health compared to the condition before. · There is a dilemma on whether the brother should donate the kidney, or they should rely on faith for James to heal. · Parents need to make a consultation with James on the matter of getting a transplanted kidney from the brother. · Features of justice include legal, familiar setting and social aspects in medical choices (Gillon, 2018). · James’ parents are driven by their faith in making decisions on medical choices. · Parents are willing to donate their kidneys rather than involving their other son as a -way of fairness. Since only their son can donate in the family, they can allow volunteers. Part 2: EvaluationAnswer each of the following questions about how principlism would be applied: Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study Paper In 200-250 words answer the following: According to the Christian worldview, which of the four principles is most pressing in this case? Explain why. (45 points) In the Christian view, beneficence is more pressing than any other form of principle. The laws are connected with kindness, charity, and mercy towards others. The principles are made in the moral obligation of the person towards other people. The moral imperative is observed in the case of the James story, where they have a high level of beneficence towards James. Doing the right thing is considered as one of the best imperative in Christian views. Parents are acting to ensure that James recovers are expected, but they do it in a better and excellent way. They are driven by a high level of faith that they believe he will be recovering. They are highly believing and hopeful that through their Christian faith, James will be healed by the prayers. Thus, they take a step to make the son to a priest before his conditions worsen later. They opt for the dialyses which turn out to be late according to the doctor. Choosing to offer their kindness is part of beneficence (Gillon, 2018). The preference for prayers was a big part of choosing faith instead of the treatment. Despite their son’s health deterioration, it would be wrong to create blame as they had taken the option out of faith. In 200-250 words answer the following: According to the Christian worldview, how might a Christian rank the priority of the four principles? Explain why. (45 points) In ranking the four principles, beneficence will be ranked first in the list. It will then be followed by non-maleficence. The third position in the rank will include justice. Finally, anatomy comes last in the list principles. In consideration of family care towards their children, people will always first show love and kindness to their children (Pipien, 2018). Such aspects are a significant part of the principle of beneficence.Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study Paper. The non-maleficence is depicted through the parent’s effort to keep the children safe, and no harm comes to them. Parents not considering Samuel for the donation of a kidney at first shows they mind him. At the same time, seeking alternatives to have James healed is in the best interest of ensuring no harm comes to their son. Christians are expected to have a great practice of fairness as part of justice towards others. Likely, they do so in all their experiences and encounters with others. In ensuring the anatomy principle, the Christians need to allow others the freedom and chances in making decisions that they are comfortable with (Kaldjian, 2019). The hospital allows the parents of James to make decisions as they plan from their decisions without any form of coercion. Thus, it supports the principle of anatomy in healthcare application. References:Beever, J., & Brightman, A. O. (2016). Reflexive principlism as an effective approach for developing ethical reasoning in engineering. Science and engineering ethics , 22 (1), 275-291. Carr, M. F., & Winslow, G. R. (2017). From conceptual to concrete. In World Religions for Healthcare Professionals (pp. 31-45). Routledge. Gillon, R. (2018). Principlism, virtuism, and the spirit of oneness. In Healthcare Ethics, Law and Professionalism (pp. 45-59). Routledge. Kaldjian, L. C. (2019). Purpose and Providence: An Outline for Christian Practical Wisdom in Health Care. Christian bioethics: Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality , 25 (2), 169-191. Pipien, I. (2018). Beneficence and nonmaleficence in care. Soins; la revue de reference infirmiere , 63 (824), 51-54. Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Read more
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Good News ! We now help with PROCTORED EXAM. Chat with a support agent for more information