Assignment: Cultural Barriers & Cervical Cancer Screening

Assignment: Cultural Barriers & Cervical Cancer Screening ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Assignment: Cultural Barriers & Cervical Cancer Screening Edit my prospectus, based on the following instructor feedback (1) You have made some minor changes to the initial document; however, I am concerned as you have not addressed all the comments made in the initial feedback. I am concerned as you insist in using a mixed methods design with primary data collection. Please note that mixed methods and primary data is not an allowed research design in the DrPH. There are still other major methodology issues that have been identified and are highlighted with my comments. Assignment: Cultural Barriers & Cervical Cancer Screening As in my previous feedback, I am attaching your document including my comments and two other documents ( 1)prospectus checklist (word document) and (2) prospectus guide pdf. to help guide you while writing this prospectus. Please use the attached checklist and guide to complete your work. The use of the prospectus guide is critical as it will guide you on the required content (it will even provide you with an example). One more thing about your prospectus. You can use only a quantitative secondary data analysis for the DrPH program. Ill attach to you : 5 articles (resources that I used to write my topic) prospectus guide prospectus checklist and 2 prospectus guides, first one included in its margins the doctor’s feed back. The second one is the one I edited based on the dr, feedback and comment, but the doctor send it back to me to revise it again based on his notes found in the margin of the first prospectus so that I can revise it more since im still not meting the doctors points and above feedback . So I want you to revise it based on the instructor feedback prospectus_checklist.docx prospectus_guide.pdf first_prospectus_that_have_dr_feedbak.docx secon_dprospectus_that_ DHA and DrPH Prospectus Checklist The following checklist, like the DHA Doctoral Study Prospectus Guide , provides guidance to support prospectus development. Included are the basic expectations for the content of the prospectus from the annotated outline in the Guide. Please refer to the Guide for additional information on how the prospectus will be submitted and evaluated. The DHA Prospectus Rubric standards and a Site-Naming Self-Check are included at the end of this checklist. Not all checklist items may be relevant to your particular study; please consult with your chair for guidance.Assignment: Cultural Barriers & Cervical Cancer Screening Instructions for students: Indicate on the checklist the page number where each heading is located. Respond to comments from the committee in each comment history box. Do not delete previous comments—just add your response in the appropriate space. Upload this checklist into Taskstream with your prospectus document for each prospectus review. Instructions for the chair, second committee member, and Program Director Designee: Provide specific feedback in the comment history column. Do not delete previous comments—just add your response in the appropriate space. If you made detailed comments are included on the prospectus draft (using track changes and comments), you can refer to the draft rather than restate comments in the checklist; upload both documents into Taskstream during rubric completion. Committee chairs should indicate their acceptance of each item by checking the appropriate checkbox by each checklist item . Date: (click here and type today’s date ®) Student’s Name: Student ID: Committee Chairperson: Second Committee Member: PhD Program Director/Designee: Prospectus Checklist Checklist Items Page # Comment History Title Page Present your Title –12 words or fewer; include topic, variables and relationship between them, and most critical key words. Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Include your name, program of study (specialization if applicable) and Student ID. Use the DHA Prospectus Template. Assignment: Cultural Barriers & Cervical Cancer Screening Problem Statement State the problem by presenting a logical argument for the need to address an identified gap in practice as supported in the research literature. Must be relevant to your discipline and area of practice (1-2 paragraphs). Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Provide evidence from scholarly and/or reputable sources that the problem is current, relevant, and meaningful to the professional field (3-5 key citations). Assure that the problem is framed within the discipline (program of study). Purpose of the Study Present a concise statement that discusses the overall purpose or intention of the study (1-2 paragraphs). Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. In quantitative studies, state what needs to be studied by describing two or more factors (variables) and a conjectured relationship among them related to the identified gap or problem. Significance Identify a) how your study will contribute to filling the identified gap (the contribution to the discipline or practice this study will make) b) how your research will support professional practice or allow practical application (the So What? question), and c) how, through alignment with your problem statement to reflect the potential relevance to society, your findings might lead to positive social change (1-2 paragraphs). This is an elaboration of what the problem addresses. Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Background Provide a representative list of scholarship (or annotated bibliography) and findings that support and clarify the main assertions in your problem statement. Highlight their relationship to the topic (5-10 peer-reviewed articles; most from the last five years; some may have already been mentioned in the first two sections of the prospectus). Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Framework Describe (and cite) the framework that demonstrates an understanding of the theories and concepts relevant to your topic (1 paragraph). Provide the original scholarly literature on the theory or concepts, even if it is more than five years old. Do not cite secondary sources. Assignment: Cultural Barriers & Cervical Cancer Screening Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Ensure alignment with your problem, purpose, research questions, and background of your study. Explain how each theory or concept relates to the study approach and research questions. Research Question(s) and Hypotheses List the question(s) that will lead to what needs to be done and how it will be accomplished . Your questions must align with your study purpose and include the variables or concepts and how they will be examined. Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Ensure your research questions inform the research design by providing a foundation for generation of hypotheses and present the null and alternative hypothesis for each research question. Nature of the Study Provide 1 concise paragraph that discusses the quantitative approach that will be used to address your research question(s) and how this approach aligns with the problem statement and purpose. Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Secondary Data Types and Sources of Information Present a list of possible types and sources of data for this study, such as employee surveys, historical documents from state records, de-identified medical records, or statistics from a federal database. Identify data source, data points, and how data will be obtained or accessed to address the research question(s). Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. Limitations, Challenges, and/or Barriers Provide information, such as limitations, challenges, and/or barriers that may need to be addressed when conducting this study. These may include access to data, data storage requirements, data access fees, etc. Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. References On a new page, list your references formatted in APA style . Chair comments: (click here®) Second Member comments: (click here®) Student comments: (click here®) ?Chair accepts items as complete. DHA and DrPH Prospectus Rubric Quality Indicators Comment History 1. Complete Does the prospectus contain all the required elements? Comments: (click here®) 2. Meaningful Has a meaningful problem or gap in practice as supported in the research literature been identified? Comments: (click here®) 3. Justified Is evidence presented that this problem is significant to the discipline and/or professional field? Comments: (click here®) 4. Grounded Is the problem framed to enable the researcher to either build on or counter the previously-published findings on the topic? Comments: (click here®) 5. Original/Relevance to Area of Practice Does this project have potential to make an original contribution that has relevance to the discipline and/or area of practice? Comments: (click here®) 6. Impact Does this project have potential to affect positive social change? Comments: (click here®) 7. Feasible Can a systematic method of inquiry be used to address the problem; and does the approach have the potential to address the problem while considering potential risks and burdens placed on research participants? Comments: (click here®) 8. Aligned Do the various aspects of the prospectus align overall? Comments: (click here®) 9. Objective Is the topic approached in an objective manner? Comments: (click here®) Partner Site Masking Self-Check Walden capstones typically mask the identity of the partner organization. The methodological and ethical reasons for this practice as well as criteria for exceptions are outlined here (link to posted guidance). ? Check here to confirm that you will mask the identity of the organization in the final capstone that you publish in ProQuest. ? If you perceive that your partner organization’s identity would be impossible to mask or if there is a strong rationale for naming the organization in your capstone, please check this box so that your Program Director can review your request for an exception. If granted, that exception must be confirmed by the IRB during the ethics review process. The IRB will also ensure that your consent form(s) and/or site agreement(s) permit naming the organization. Assignment: Cultural Barriers & Cervical Cancer Screening Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10