[SOLVED] Philosophy of Love and Sex
Elliston (Frederick Elliston, “In Defense of Promiscuity”) spells out five arguments condemning promiscuity and gives what he no doubt views as decisive counter-arguments:The Western Norm and Technology;The Inseparability Premise and Promiscuity;Promiscuity as a Threat to Monogamy;Lying, Deceiving, and Exploiting; and,Personal Emotional Security and GrowthWhich of these arguments do you think is the best of the five? That is, which argument do you think poses the most significant challenge to Elliston’s project of defending the moral acceptability of promiscuity. Justify your answer. What is the argument, as you construe it from Elliston’s account? Are Elliston’s responses to it satisfactory? Why or why not? Finally, is there a sense or are there senses of objectification of the ten we’ve considered this semester, (quoting from Halwani, Raja Halwani, “On Fucking Around”,
