Self Management Of Diabetes Among African American Health Plan

Self Management Of Diabetes Among African American Health Plan Self Management Of Diabetes Among African American Health Plan Rough draft for health plan topic: Health plan for self management of diabetes among African American. questions.pdf example_of_health_plan.pdf ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Topic: Health plan for self management of diabetes among African American. Submit a draft of your health plan (see the final health plan instructions for an outline of what should be included in the plan). OUTLINE FOR FINAL PLAN: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Define the problem a. Review evidence-based literature for similar problems and “population based approaches to solving the problem and evidence that the approach(es) worked”. This component of the assignment requires eight (8) evidence-based articles. Develop an evaluation plan. Review the nine steps of a program evaluation on page 126 of the textbook. Use these steps as a guide for your evaluation plan. Ensure that your evaluation plan includes and thoroughly describes each of these nine steps. Identify “priority health problems” Understand underlying factors that contribute to the problem Review Healthy People 2020 42 topics listed on page 112 of the textbook and determine if the problem you have identified is on the list. Review the following models in the textbook and determine which model(s) applies to your community assessment: Precede-Proceed Model, Change model, Logic model Review and apply the five steps to program evaluation found on page 124 of the textbook. The evaluation models include formative evaluation, process evaluation and summative evaluation. The community assessment should detail the program planning, interventions and evaluation of the health problem that you selected for the population that you chose in week 1 of the course. References Submitted: References Chlebowy DO & Garvin BJ.(2006). Social support, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations: impact on self-care behaviors and glycemic control in Caucasian and African American adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ.32(5):777–86. Collins-McNeil J., Edwards C.L., Batch B. Benbow D., McDougald C. & Sharpe D. (2012). A culturaly Targeted Self-Management Program for African Americans with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Can J Nurs Res. 44(4): 126-141. D’Eramo-Melkus G, Spollett G, Jefferson V, et al.(2004). A culturally competent intervention of education and care for Black women with type 2 diabetes. Appl Nurs Res. 17(1):10–20. Harris MI, Flegal KM, Cowie CC, et al. (2001). Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in U.S. adults. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Diabetes Care.21(4):518–24 Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Narayan KM.(2001). Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care.24(3):561–87. 19. Samuel-Hodge CD, Keyserling TC, Park S, et al.(2009). A randomized trial of a church based diabetes self-management program for African Americans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 35(3):439–54. Health Plan to Reduce Catheter-Associated Infections in an Acute Care Hospital Problem Over one million people develop healthcare-associated infections with 100,000 of those who die due to complications associated with infections (Clarke et al., 2013). Health-care associated infections are part of the Healthy People 2020 topics. Catheterassociated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) are the most common hospital acquired infection accounting for 70%-80% of all urinary tract infections (Lo, et al., 2014). Infection is the most common adverse effect of indwelling urinary catheters (Lo, et al., 2014). The duration of catheterization increases the risk for infection by 3% to 8% each day of catheterization (Adams, Bucior, Day, & Rimmer, 2012). Also, the diagnosis for CAUTI can be difficult due to asymptomatic bacteriuria that can be misdiagnosed which can lead to inappropriate use of antibiotics (Adams, Bucior, Day, & Rimmer, 2012). CAUTI leads to increased healthcare costs, increased hospital stays, and patient morbidity (Parry, Grand, & Sestovic, 2013). Furthermore, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have stopped paying for costs related to hospital-acquired CAUTIs (Parry, Grand, & Sestovic, 2013). Hospitals are required to report CAUTI and other hospital acquired infections to the CDC (Dudeck et al., 2013). The cost of CAUTI is estimated to be $1200-$4700 per patient (Clarke et al., 2013). The biggest contributing factor to the cause of CAUTI is inappropriate use of indwelling catheters which have caused an avoidable burden to patients (Parker et al., 2017). There have been improvements to prevent hospital-acquired infections, but more improvement is needed (United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2014). This health plan focuses on reducing CAUTI at the Minneapolis VA Hospital for inpatient units by reducing CAUTI by at least 50% and reducing urinary catheter use of 75% by improving CAUTI policies, educating staff, and surveilling staff adherence. There have been efforts by many hospitals to reduce the incidence of CAUTI. Lo et al., 2014) found a “systemic review in hospitalized patients reported that the use of intervention including a reminder to staff that a catheter was in place and a stop order to prompt removal of unnecessary catheters reduced CAUTI by 53%” (p.465). CAUTI was found to be reduced by 17.5% to 6.6% when there were policies in place that follow criteria for indications to insert and continue indwelling catheters (Lo et al., 2014). Self Management Of Diabetes Among African American Health Plan In Michigan, there was a statewide program that decreased CAUTI from 18.1% to 13.8% by providing education to staff on appropriateness of indwelling catheters and daily assessment of catheter indication (Lo et al., 2014). Nurse initiated catheter removal protocols have reduced CAUTI by 25% in Michigan hospitals (Lo et al., 2014). Introducing catheter bundles that aim to reduce CAUTI including avoidance of catheter insertion, timely removal, and correct management of catheters reduced CAUTI from 18.5% to 9.2% (Lo et al., 2014). Also, introducing CAUTI bundles that included silver alloy catheters, use of securement devices, keeping catheter bag off the floor, and better documentation reduced the CAUTI rate by 71% (Clarke et al., 2013). Strategies should be implemented such as having only trained staff insert catheters under aseptic technique, supplies for insertion are available and conveniently located for staff, and surveillance to support catheter use and outcomes (Lo et al., 2014). The recommended criteria for inserting an indwelling catheter includes perioperative for certain surgical procedures, hourly assessment of urinary output is needed in ICU units, management of acute urinary retention and obstruction, to aid in healing of open pressure ulcers or skin grafts for patients with urinary incontinence, and at a patient’s request at the end of life for comfort (Gould, Umscheid, Agarwal, Pegues, & HICPC, 2017). It is essential for healthcare providers to be aware of the criteria for both indication and maintenance of catheters (Underwoord, 2015). There are risk factors that can contribute to CAUTI in acute care settings that include age, neutropenia, renal disease, and males (Lo et al., 2014). The biggest risk factor for CAUTI is the duration of catheterization (Lo et al., 2014). The reservoir for infection is the drainage bag, so infection can be transmitted to other patients by healthcare workers (Lo et al., 2014). Plan & Objectives The clearest evidence shows that reducing indwelling catheter use reduces CAUTI and is the most effective method to reduce CAUTI. The goal is to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) at the Minneapolis VA Hospital in inpatient units. CAUTI is the most common hospital acquired infection as well as the one of the most preventable. The VA Minneapolis hospital was reviewed to assess indwelling catheter policies. The VA Minneapolis was following many of the recommended guidelines including using a closed drainage system, using aseptic technique, education to staff on insertion, and methods to reduce catheterization. One area that needed improvement was implementing better documentation of catheter insertion and removal, indication for the catheter on the physician’s order, and daily assessment of need to continue indwelling catheters. There were no stop orders for catheters which caused some missed care for catheter removal or re-insertion. The objectives of the CAUTI health plan are to reduce catheter-associated infections by creating insertion and removal templates for nursing staff, daily documentation in nursing notes for indication, policies that follow recommended criteria for catheter insertion, indication on physician order for insertion, and automatic stop orders when insertion order is written (Lo et al., 2014). Also, implementing a nurse driven catheter removal protocol when criteria is met to continue the indwelling urinary catheter (Lo et al., 2014). Nurse driven protocols have been found to reduce indwelling urinary catheter use by 50.2% (Parry, Grant, & Sestovic, 2013). A nurse driven protocol will involve nurse removal of indwelling urinary catheters when criteria is not met (Parry, Grant, & Sestovic, 2013). Self Management Of Diabetes Among African American Health Plan When nurse-initiated removal protocols were initiated at a community hospital, staff compliance improved to 88% (Mari, 2014). The guidelines for the nurse-initiated protocol will be implemented on the spinal cord injury unit which has a high number of indwelling urinary catheters. Indwelling catheter continued need will be assessed daily by the day shift nurse and documented in the nurse shift note. The criteria to continue an indwelling catheter includes perioperative use for select surgical procedures (urologic, GI, prolonged surgeries, large volume infusions or diuretics during surgery, intraoperative monitoring of urinary output), hourly assessment needed for ICU patients, management of acute urinary retention, for assistance with healing open pressure ulcers or skin grafts, patients with urinary incontinence, and end of life care per patient’s request to improve comfort (Mari, 2014). When nurses followed the indwelling catheter indication criteria indwelling catheter use was reduced by 17% in just a two-month period (Adams, Bucior, Day, & Rimmer, 2012). When the criteria are met to continue to indwelling catheter, the day shift nurse will re- asses each day. When the nurse indicates that the indwelling catheter should be removed a protocol will be followed. This will include removing the indwelling catheter assessing for spontaneous voiding, patient not voiding but expresses no urge to void, and if the patient is uncomfortable and has the urge to void (Mari, 2014). The nurse will bladder scan the patient if the patient is uncomfortable with no urge to void, the patient has an urge to void but is unable to do so, the patient is incontinent, and if the patient has not voided in over 6 hours (Mari, 2014). If patient is uncomfortable and has the urge to void and the bladder scan is more than 400, the nurse will perform straight catheterization one time and notify the physician (Mari, 2014). The nurse will also attempt to use external catheter devices such as condom catheters when appropriate. To improve documentation, an insertion and removal template will be created for the nurse to complete. The templates will include the licensed staff name, date and time, indication, size of catheter, and aseptic technique. There will also be mandatory education sessions on new documentation, insertion, aseptic technique, unobstructed urinary tubing, bag below bladder and not on the floor, closed drainage systems, catheter care, collecting urine samples correctly, securement devices, indications for indwelling catheters, bladder scanning protocols, and removal protocol. The staff will follow indication criteria or may fill in other with a comment for special circumstances the doctor may order. Evaluation Plan The first step of evaluation is to identify the stakeholders, and this is completed before the program begins (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). The stakeholders should include the staff on the evaluation team, staff from the area of the interventions (staff nurse, etc.), and what community representation is needed for the program (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). For the CAUTI health plan which focuses on reducing healthcareassociated infections there are numerous stakeholders that should be included. The stakeholders should include the nurse manager, assistant nurse manager, staff nurse team, HAI unit champions, infection control nurse, documentation department, nursing practice committee chairs, manager of housekeeping staff, housekeeping staff champions, research team, nurse informatics and nursing assistant unit champions. Including these stakeholders will give a more in-depth perspective of evaluation of the objectives. Self Management Of Diabetes Among African American Health Plan The second step is to develop questions. The questions are created by the stakeholders and will determine the program improvements and effectiveness (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). Questions should include what data needs to be collected, the information needed, what the goals of the program are, and what needs to be accomplished (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). This step also includes how the information will be communicated, what information will be communicated, and who it will be communicated to (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). The focus of the health plan will be to reduce catheter-associated infections. The data that needs to be collected is the number of CAUTI in inpatient units, the number of indwelling catheters, the duration of catheterization, risk factors that increase CAUTI, current policies for CAUTI detection, current policies for CAUTI management and prevention, review of indwelling catheter documentation, policies on indwelling catheter insertion techniques, audit of staff competencies for indwelling catheter insertion, and the indication for indwelling catheters (Lo et al., 2014). The goals of the program are to reduce CAUTI in inpatient units, improve policies for indwelling catheters, and educate staff on CAUTI prevention and indwelling catheter use. The data collected will help create more focused goals that may include documentation improvements, nurse driven indwelling catheter removal policies, better communication on indwelling catheter indications, and more focused policies for indwelling catheter use (Lo et al., 2014). Once data is collected and the research team has developed current evidence-based practice, the stakeholders will review the data and develop policies to improve indwelling catheter management to reduce CAUTI in inpatient units. The new changes will be trialed on the spinal cord unit which has a higher number of indwelling catheters than other units. When the trial is completed and if improvements are noted, the information will be communicated to staff with mandatory educational classes. Step three of program evaluation is to create a budget (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). The budget can vary depending on the staff needed, size of the program, and equipment that is needed (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). For the CAUTI health plan, the staff will meet weekly for two hours to discuss the plan and goal progression during their normal scheduled hours. The research and informatics team will work their normal hours with the focus on the CAUTI health plan. The staff teams of nurses, nursing assistants, housekeeping staff, and nurse managers will focus one-two hours per scheduled shift to the CAUTI program. The infection control nurse will assist with research and evaluating infection control on all inpatient units. The goal is for the program to be completed within six months. The budget for the program should not exceed more than $20,000 as most staff will be working their normal schedules. Data processing systems are already in place, so no extra costs should be acquired. Step four of program evaluation will be whether to have internal or external evaluators (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). Self Management Of Diabetes Among African American Health Plan The program will be evaluated by internal infection control nurses that are not directly involved in the project to prevent biases. It is important to have external evaluators present for the program planning process (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). Steps five through seven include the program implementation phase (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). Data collection methods are determined in step five, data is collected in step six, and data is analyzed and interpreted in step seven. For the CAUTI program, data will be collected by completing chart audits and observation of staff’s infection control methods during catheterization and during catheterization insertion. The spinal cord unit will have a CAUTI champion that is not known to staff that can observe staff. The infection control nurse can also make unannounced visits to the unit to assess infection control measures and compliance. The research team and nurse informatics will analyze and interpret the data collected. The documentation team will create insertion and removal templates, as well as improve physician orders that include indication and create automatic stop orders. Step eight is completed when the evaluation is complete. The data collected is presented to all the stakeholders (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). This will be conducted by holding a meeting with all stakeholder’s present. Step nine involves using the evaluation information to prove or improve the program (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). The information needs to include all data collected as well as the data analyzed and interpreted (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). This helps improve the program decisions (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). For the CAUTI program, the information will be presented to the administrative leadership with the goal of attaining more funding to improve the CAUTI program in the hospital. Logic Model The logic model can be used for the CAUTI health plan to help guide in careful and well thought out planning (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). The CAUTI plan will be clear when implemented and evaluated (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). The CAUTI team has developed clear objectives and expected outcomes for the project (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). The resources needed for the project are human resources. The projects that are used currently are appropriate in reducing CAUTI. Staff will be working their normal hours with a focus on the CAUTI project. The activities for the CAUTI health plan have been identified with each stakeholder contributing to the project. Educational staff will be involved to educate the staff on the spinal cord injury on the trial for the CAUTI project. Next, the output of the project will be better documentation to reduce CAUTI by ultimately reducing indwelling catheters on the spinal cord injury unit. Once the trial is completed, the team will meet to discuss any needed changes to the new interventions. Then, the team will present the changes to the nursing practice council and leadership in the hospital to make the change effective hospital wide. The intended outcomes of the CAUTI project will be to reduce the use of indwelling catheters thus reducing CAUTI hospital wide. The impact of the CAUTI project will be a significant reduction in CAUTI hospital wide. Evaluation The first step in evaluation is formative evaluation. This evaluation is done when the program is being developed (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). This step is completed to get feedback during the early stages of the program and makes changes as needed (Savage, Kub, & Graves, 2016). The CAUTI team will get feedback from the spinal cord injury unit staff to determine if interventions are attainable and feasible. This will give the team the opportunity to make changes to interventions as needed. This team will meet with staff on the unit weekly during the trial to get feedback. The second step is the process evaluation. This involves documenting how the program was delivered and if the delivery was what was designed in the program design (Sava … Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Struggling to find relevant content? Order a custom essay on
Self Management Of Diabetes Among African American Health Plan
Let our experts save you the hassle
Order Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with GPA Fix
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
We appreciate every review and are always looking for ways to grow. See what other students think about our do my paper service.
Nursing
Perfectly done! Thanks again.
Customer 452707, July 18th, 2022
Management
Comprehensively done. Thank you
Customer 452583, July 20th, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Excellent Work!
Customer 452587, September 16th, 2021
Nursing
Not all sources were " American sources" as directed
Customer 452615, September 16th, 2021
ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE
EXCELLENT
Customer 452813, June 19th, 2022
Other
great
Customer 452813, June 25th, 2022
Nursing
Thank you!!!
Customer 452557, June 26th, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Awesome, Work! Didn't have to add much to it. Thank You!
Customer 452587, September 7th, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Excellent Work!!!!
Customer 452587, November 29th, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Great Work!
Customer 452587, November 2nd, 2021
Nursing
excellent service! Not a beat missed!
Customer 452453, October 17th, 2021
Nursing
Always a job well done. I really appreciate the hard work.
Customer 452453, January 4th, 2021
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
error: Content is protected !!

Save More. Score Better. Use coupon code SPECIAL for a 15%discount