Phenomenon of Interest

Module 1-B Paper: Phenomenon of Interest Module 1-B Paper: Phenomenon of Interest Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction and Thesis Statement 1. Introduce the problem/Phenomenon of Interest (POI) you plan to explore in one (1) paragraph. 2. Conclude the introductory paragraph with a direct thesis statement that informs the reader of the purpose, or the primary objective of the paper. 1.0 to >0.8 pts Met The information fully addresses the required content and demonstrates an understanding of the POI. Thesis statement was well developed. 0.8 to >0.0 pts Not Met Minimal or partial information that does not full address the required element; either an introduction or thesis statement may not be included 0.0 pts Missing Student did not address. 1.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePhenomenon of Interest Identity Phenomenon of Interest (POI) 1. Describe your approved POI, including the setting and population. 2. Describe the significance of your POI to your advanced specialty focus (Nurse Practitioner, Executive Nursing Administration, Nursing Informatics, etc), and population 3.. Discuss the impact of the POI on the overall healthcare system and support your discussion with relevant statistical data.  4. Include at least three (3) current peer-reviewed references in addition to any textbooks. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Met or Exceeds The information fully addresses the required elements and demonstrates an understanding of the significance of chosen POI to the area of practice. Content is supported with peer-reviewed literature. 4.0 to >2.0 pts Met Minimum Criteria The information was basic and addressed the required content in some manner. Content may not be well supported with peer-reviewed literature. 2.0 to >0.0 pts Did not Meet Criteria The information did not address each of the required elements. Content may not be supported with current peer-reviewed literature 0.0 pts Missing Student did not address. 6.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePhilosophic Viewpoints 1. Weigh the differences between the Analytical and Continential philosophic viewpoints and identify your preferred philosophic view. 2. Discuss how your preferred philosophic view influences the type of information (data) you evaluate regarding your chosen POI and the impact of your view on the way you provide care. 5. Describe the value of information (data) represented by your alternative or opposing philosophic viewpoint in evaluating your chosen POI 4. Describe how you would incorporate both the Analytical and Continental philosophic views in your advanced nursing practice. 5. Include at least four (4) peer-reviewed references in addition to any textbooks. Classic references based on theory may be older than 5 years. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Met or Exceeds Criteria The information fully addresses the required elements and demonstrates an understanding of the POI through the lens of the primary philosophic view. Content is well supported with peer-reviewed references, of which classic literature based on theory may be older than 5 years. 4.0 to >2.0 pts Met Minimum Criteria The information was basic and addressed the required content in some manner. Content may not be well supported with peer-reviewed references. 2.0 to >0.0 pts Did not Meet Criteria The information did not address the required content. Content may not be supported with peer-reviewed literature. 0.0 pts Missing Student did not address. 6.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWays of Knowing 1. Summarize the four patterns of knowing described by Carper (1978). 2. Discuss how each of the four patterns of knowing will influence your future advanced practice role. 3. Describe how you will use the patterns of knowing to seek information needed to care for your patient or a population. 4. Support your discussion with at least two (2) peer-reviewed references, citing primary sources. Classic literature may be older than 5 years. 4.0 to >2.5 pts Met or Exceeds Criteria The information fully addresses the required elements and demonstrates an understanding of the four ways of knowing. Content is well supported with peer-reviewed reference, of which classic literature may be older than 5 years. 2.5 to >1.5 pts Met Minimum Criteria The information was basic and addressed the majority of the required content in some manner. Content may not be well supported by peer-reviewed literature. 1.5 to >0.0 pts Did not Meet Criteria The information did not address the required content. Content may not be supported with peer-reviewed literature. 0.0 pts Missing Student did not address. 4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion 1. Summarize the major points of the paper in one (1) paragraph. 2. No new information or references should be included in this section. 1.0 to >0.8 pts Met The information fully summarizes the major points in the paper, without including any new information or references 0.8 to >0.0 pts Not Met The information did not adequately summarize the major points in the paper. New information or references may have been introduced. 0.0 pts Missing Student did not address. 1.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGraduate Level Scholarship Demonstrate Graduate Level Scholarship 1. Formal, scholarly writing style with no first-person language. 2. Writing should be clear and concise, and free of grammatical and spelling errors 3. Organize work by headings 4. Writing should be free of APA 7th errors, including citations and references. 5. Full paper (except reference page, appendices, and attachments) submitted to Turnitin, with minimal similarity. 6. College of Nursing approved format for the title page. 7. A minimum of nine (9) peer-reviewed references (excluding textbooks). 8. Paper not to exceed six (6) pages (excluding title page, reference page, and any appendices). 9. Follow all assignment instructions. 10. Additional deductions may apply for late submissions, plagiarism, or lack of scholarship and professionalism. 2.0 to >1.6 pts Met or Exceeds Criteria Demonstrates graduate-level scholarship with no more than one (1) to two (2) types of error. Faculty discretion will apply. 1.6 to >1.4 pts Met Minimum Criteria Demonstrates minimal graduate-level scholarship with three (3) types of errors (the error type may have been repeated multiple times). Faculty discretion will apply. 1.4 to >0.0 pts Did not Meet Criteria Does not demonstrate graduate-level scholarship with four (4) types of error (the error type may have been repeated multiple times). Faculty discretion will apply. 0.0 pts Missing Graduate-level scholarship missing, with five (5) or more types of errors (the error type may have been repeated multiple times). Faculty discretion will apply. 2.0 pts