Nurse Informatics

Assignment Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies. Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking. In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.   To Prepare:   Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery. Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.” Identify and select 4 peer-reviewed research articles from your research. For information about annotated bibliographies, visit https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographies The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)   In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:   ? Identify the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format. ? Include an introduction explaining the purpose of the paper. ? Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples. ? In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles. Use APA 7th format and include a title page. Rubric Detail   Name: NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric     Excellent Fair Poor In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following: ·   Properly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed. ·   Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples. In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles. 77 (77%) – 85 (85%) The responses accurately and clearly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment. The responses accurately and thoroughly summarize in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses.   Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.   Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.   Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors.     Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric   Learning Resources Required Readings   McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.   Chapter 14, “The Electronic Health Record and Clinical Informatics” (pp. 267–287) Chapter 15, “Informatics Tools to Promote Patient Safety and Quality Outcomes” (pp. 293–317) Chapter 16, “Patient Engagement and Connected Health” (pp. 323–338) Chapter 17, “Using Informatics to Promote Community/Population Health” (pp. 341–355) Chapter 18, “Telenursing and Remote Access Telehealth” (pp. 359–388) Dykes, P. C., Rozenblum, R., Dalal, A., Massaro, A., Chang, F., Clements, M., Collins, S. …Bates, D. W. (2017). Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study. Critical Care Medicine, 45(8), e806–e813. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002449   HealthIT.gov. (2018c). What is an electronic health record (EHR)? Retrieved from   https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr   Rao-Gupta, S., Kruger, D. Leak, L. D., Tieman, L. A., & Manworren, R. C. B. (2018). Leveraging interactive patient care technology to Improve pain management engagement. Pain Management Nursing, 19(3), 212–221.   Skiba, D. (2017). Evaluation tools to appraise social media and mobile applications. Informatics, 4(3), 32–40.     THE 4 PEER-REVIEWED RESEARCH ARTICLES.RESEARCH ARTICLES   1)    Remote monitoring improves outcome after ICD implantation: the clinical efficacy in the management of heart failure (EFFECT) study   De Simone, A., Leoni, L., Luzi, M., Amellone, C., Stabile, G., La Rocca, V., Capucci, A., D’onofrio, A., Ammendola, E., Accardi, F., Valsecchi, S., & Buja, G. (2015). Remote monitoring improves outcome after ICD implantation: the clinical efficacy in the management of heart failure (EFFECT) study. EP Europace, 17(8), 1267–1275. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu318   In-text citation: (De Simone et al., 2015)   2)    Effects of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes and use of healthcare resources in heart failure patients with biventricular defibrillators: results of the MORE-CARE multicentre randomized controlled trial   Boriani, G., Da Costa, A., Quesada, A., Ricci, R. P., Favale, S., Boscolo, G., Clementy, N., Amori, V., Mangoni di S Stefano, L., Burri, H., & MORE-CARE Study Investigators. (2017). Effects of remote monitoring on clinical outcomes and use of healthcare resources in heart failure patients with biventricular defibrillators: results of the MORE-CARE multicentre randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Heart Failure, 19(3), 416–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.626   In-text citation: (Boriani et al., 2017)   3)    Effectiveness of a telemonitoring intensive strategy in early rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with the conventional management approach Salaffi, F., Carotti, M., Ciapetti, A., Di Carlo, M., Gasparini, S., Farah, S., & Gutierrez, M. (2016). Effectiveness of a telemonitoring intensive strategy in early rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with the conventional management approach. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 17, 1–11. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1002-2 In-text citation: (Salaffi et al., 2016)   4)    Effect of an Internet-based telehealth system on functional capacity and cognition in breast cancer survivors: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial 4) Galiano-Castillo, N., Arroyo-Morales, M., Lozano-Lozano, M., Fernández-Lao, C., Martín-Martín, L., Del-Moral-Ávila, R., & Cantarero-Villanueva, I. (2017). Effect of an Internet-based telehealth system on functional capacity and cognition in breast cancer survivors: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Supportive Care in Cancer: Official Journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 25(11), 3551–3559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3782-9   In-text citation: (Galiano-Castillo et al., 2017)