NURS 4345 Healthcare Information Technology Forum Grading Rubric

NURS 4345 Healthcare Information Technology Forum Grading Rubric NURS 4345 Healthcare Information Technology Forum Grading Rubric Minimum word count of 250 words excluding references. References should be peer-reviewed, scholarly, References should not be older than 5 years.Responses in the forum should be in APA format. forum__discussion_grading_rubric.pdf participate_in_forum_discussion_activity.docx forum__discussion_grading_rubric.pdf Summer 2018 Forum Grading Rubric NURS 4345 Healthcare Information Technology Forum Grading Rubric Criteria Expert Proficient Content Content in the posting is accurate, relevant to the assigned question, and demonstrates student learning related to module content (Minimum word count of 250 words excluding references Content is accurate, relevant and topic discussed in-depth. Content demonstrates student learning related to module content within minimum word count Content is accurate, relevant to the topic and demonstrates student learning within minimum word count Points References related to instructor question Response is supported by student conducted research. Two references required. References should be peer reviewed, scholarly and professional. References should not be older than 5 years. Points Engagement Response is relevant to peer posting(s). Response demonstrates learning from the peers posting. Student must respond to two peer postings on a different question than the question they themselves answered. Minimum of 125 words for each of the two 30 Competent Content is accurate, and relevant with minimal discussion of the topic as it relates to the module content within minimum word count Substantial Areas for Improvement Unsatisfactory Content is not accurate OR Content is not relevant to the topic OR Student does not integrate the module content into the topic. OR Does not meet minimum word count. 20 Assignment not posted 27 24 Utilized more than the assigned number of references (2) in response Utilized the assigned number of references (2) in response References are peerreviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. Requirement for two references was not met as evidenced by: +One reference cited OR +References were not peerreviewed, professional or scholarly OR +Reference(s) outdated Did not include references References are peer reviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. Utilized assigned number of references (2) in response but reference requirements were not met as evidenced by the following: one reference was not peerreviewed, professional or scholarly 0 10 Response is relevant to two or more peer postings on different questions than they themselves answered. Response to peers is thoughtful, reflective, and respectful. Integrates learning from peers posting to module content within minimum word count 9 Response is relevant to one student posting on a different question than the question they themselves answered and responding to one peer posting on the same question they themselves answered. Integrates learning from peers posting to module content within minimum word count 8 Requirement for engagement was not met as evidenced by: +Response adds minimal information or knowledge to two peer postings OR +One response to peer posting is on the same question they themselves answered OR Response within minimum word count 7 Requirement for engagement was not met as evidenced by: +Response to two peer postings paraphrases what peer has said without adding additional information or knowledge OR +Responded to only one peer posting OR 0 Did not post response to student posting OR Reply is clearly disrespectful student peer posts excluding references Points References related to response to student posting Response is supported by student conducted research. NURS 4345 Healthcare Information Technology Forum Grading Rubric Two references are required for each response to the peer postings. References should be scholarly and professional. References should not be older than 5 years. 20 Utilized more than the assigned number of references (2) in each response Points Scholarly Presentation Writing style allows for clear communication of thoughts through logical presentation demonstrating effective preparation and critical thinking. 10 Thoughts are organized, succinct and demonstrate critical thinking without errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation. 9 Thoughts are organized demonstrating critical thinking OR One error in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 8 Thoughts are organized OR Two errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 7 Thoughts show minimal organization and lack of critical thinking OR Three errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 15 APA formatting followed 12 One APA error 10 Two APA errors 8 Three APA errors 12 10 Writing style demonstrates correct spelling, grammar, sentence structure and punctuation. Points APA Style Proper APA formatting should be followed Points Grade References are peer reviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. 15 18 Utilized the assigned number of references (2) in each response References are peerreviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. 15 Utilized assigned number of references (2) in each response but reference requirements were not met as evidenced by the following: +One or two references were not peer- reviewed, professional or scholarly +Did not meet minimum word count for each student peer posting. 13 Requirement for two references for each response were not met as evidenced by: +One reference cited in each response OR +Three or four references were not peer-reviewed, professional or scholarly OR +Reference(s) outdated 8 0 Did not utilize references 0 No posting OR Thoughts show no logical organization or critical thinking OR Four or more errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 0 Four or more APA errors 0 PLAGIARISM: Plagiarism is considered cheating and is a violation of academic integrity as outlined in the Student Handbook. Any student who plagiarizes any portion of the assignment may receive a grade of zero on the assignment. LATE ASSIGNMENTS: Unless prior faculty notification and negotiation of an extended deadline, ten (10) points will be deducted per day if submitted late. Assignment will not be accepted if submitted more than 3 days late and assigned grade will be 0 (zero). Revised 7/24/2013;12/29/2014;11/30/2016cs; 03/2017; 06/2017 cs/rp Participate in Forum Discussion activity. Please refer to the Forum Discussion grading rubric found in the module. that directly related to Health CareTechnology Do not focus on nursing diagnosis, disease processes, nursing treatments Respond to one course facilitator question as follows: 1. Identify three ways to improve the safety, efficacy and efficiency of nursing care using healthcare information technology. Include at least one rationale for each area identified. 2. Discuss how the use of healthcare information technology can: a. Enhance communication between healthcare providers, patients and other healthcare facilities b. Support decision-making c. Promote improvement of patient care and delivery systems 3. Clinical Decision Support (CDS) encompasses a variety of tools to enhance decision-making in the clinical workflow. Describe three CDS tools and the impact of each one on patient care. 4. Identify the two benefits and two barriers in the use of clinical support systems in healthcare organizations. Minimum word count of 250 words excluding references. References should be peer-reviewed, scholarly, References should not be older than 5 years. Responses in the forum should be in APA format. NURS 4345 Healthcare Information Technology Forum Grading Rubric Summer 2018 Forum Grading Rubric NURS 4345 Healthcare Information Technology Forum Grading Rubric Criteria Expert Proficient Content Content in the posting is accurate, relevant to the assigned question, and demonstrates student learning related to module content (Minimum word count of 250 words excluding references Content is accurate, relevant and topic discussed in-depth. Content demonstrates student learning related to module content within minimum word count Content is accurate, relevant to the topic and demonstrates student learning within minimum word count Points References related to instructor question Response is supported by student conducted research. Two references required. References should be peer reviewed, scholarly and professional. References should not be older than 5 years. Points Engagement Response is relevant to peer posting(s). Response demonstrates learning from the peers posting. Student must respond to two peer postings on a different question than the question they themselves answered. Minimum of 125 words for each of the two 30 Competent Content is accurate, and relevant with minimal discussion of the topic as it relates to the module content within minimum word count Substantial Areas for Improvement Unsatisfactory Content is not accurate OR Content is not relevant to the topic OR Student does not integrate the module content into the topic. OR Does not meet minimum word count. 20 Assignment not posted 27 24 Utilized more than the assigned number of references (2) in response Utilized the assigned number of references (2) in response References are peerreviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. Requirement for two references was not met as evidenced by: +One reference cited OR +References were not peerreviewed, professional or scholarly OR +Reference(s) outdated Did not include references References are peer reviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. Utilized assigned number of references (2) in response but reference requirements were not met as evidenced by the following: one reference was not peerreviewed, professional or scholarly 0 10 Response is relevant to two or more peer postings on different questions than they themselves answered. Response to peers is thoughtful, reflective, and respectful. Integrates learning from peers posting to module content within minimum word count 9 Response is relevant to one student posting on a different question than the question they themselves answered and responding to one peer posting on the same question they themselves answered. Integrates learning from peers posting to module content within minimum word count 8 Requirement for engagement was not met as evidenced by: +Response adds minimal information or knowledge to two peer postings OR +One response to peer posting is on the same question they themselves answered OR Response within minimum word count 7 Requirement for engagement was not met as evidenced by: +Response to two peer postings paraphrases what peer has said without adding additional information or knowledge OR +Responded to only one peer posting OR 0 Did not post response to student posting OR Reply is clearly disrespectful student peer posts excluding references Points References related to response to student posting Response is supported by student conducted research. Two references are required for each response to the peer postings. References should be scholarly and professional. References should not be older than 5 years. 20 Utilized more than the assigned number of references (2) in each response Points Scholarly Presentation Writing style allows for clear communication of thoughts through logical presentation demonstrating effective preparation and critical thinking.NURS 4345 Healthcare Information Technology Forum Grading Rubric 10 Thoughts are organized, succinct and demonstrate critical thinking without errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation. 9 Thoughts are organized demonstrating critical thinking OR One error in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 8 Thoughts are organized OR Two errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 7 Thoughts show minimal organization and lack of critical thinking OR Three errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 15 APA formatting followed 12 One APA error 10 Two APA errors 8 Three APA errors 12 10 Writing style demonstrates correct spelling, grammar, sentence structure and punctuation. Points APA Style Proper APA formatting should be followed Points Grade References are peer reviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. 15 18 Utilized the assigned number of references (2) in each response References are peerreviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. 15 Utilized assigned number of references (2) in each response but reference requirements were not met as evidenced by the following: +One or two references were not peer- reviewed, professional or scholarly +Did not meet minimum word count for each student peer posting. 13 Requirement for two references for each response were not met as evidenced by: +One reference cited in each response OR +Three or four references were not peer-reviewed, professional or scholarly OR +Reference(s) outdated 8 0 Did not utilize references 0 No posting OR Thoughts show no logical organization or critical thinking OR Four or more errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 0 Four or more APA errors 0 PLAGIARISM: Plagiarism is considered cheating and is a violation of academic integrity as outlined in the Student Handbook. Any student who plagiarizes any portion of the assignment may receive a grade of zero on the assignment. LATE ASSIGNMENTS: Unless prior faculty notification and negotiation of an extended deadline, ten (10) points will be deducted per day if submitted late. Assignment will not be accepted if submitted more than 3 days late and assigned grade will be 0 (zero). Revised 7/24/2013;12/29/2014;11/30/2016cs; 03/2017; 06/2017 cs/rp …NURS 4345 Healthcare Information Technology Forum Grading Rubric ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Struggling to find relevant content? Order a custom essay on
NURS 4345 Healthcare Information Technology Forum Grading Rubric
Let our experts save you the hassle
Order Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with GPA Fix
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
We appreciate every review and are always looking for ways to grow. See what other students think about our do my paper service.
Application Letters
Well written essay, will definitely use this service in the future.
Customer 452773, April 14th, 2022
Other
GREAT
Customer 452813, July 3rd, 2022
Nursing
Thanks
Customer 452521, May 13th, 2021
Medicine
This has everything that was in the rubric. Thank you!
Customer 452707, May 29th, 2022
Other
GREAT
Customer 452813, June 20th, 2022
Other
great
Customer 452813, June 25th, 2022
Nursing
Great work. thank you again!
Customer 452707, August 7th, 2022
Education
Thank you so much
Customer 452631, October 5th, 2021
Nursing
Thank you for your help.
Customer 452707, July 5th, 2022
Nursing
Thank you for the great job and timely delivery.
Customer 452457, December 18th, 2020
Other
I requested two pages and only have one page and the second pages is references.
Customer 452475, August 22nd, 2022
Nursing
Everything was done thoroughly and with care. Awesome job!!!
Customer 452453, April 10th, 2021
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
error: Content is protected !!

Save More. Score Better. Use coupon code SPECIAL for a 15%discount