Minds, Brains, Computers

PAPER ASSIGNMENT Topic: Briefly present Searle’s two thought experiments that are designed to show that simulations of brains do not understand the external symbols they manipulate (namely, the water pipe simulation and the “Chinese gym”).  Then, explain the Churchlands’ alternative viewpoint, according to which at least some brain simulations ‘might be conscious’. Which side in this debate, Searle or the Churchlands, provides the most compelling reasons in your opinion? Explain why you think so and then try to advance the discussion a couple of steps. To advance the discussion, you will need to think about how the viewpoint opposing your own is likely to respond.  Spec’s: 5 pages, double-spaced, some normal font, standard margins.  Criteria of evaluation: Exposition of the views/arguments •clarity •fullness •accuracy  Evaluation •degree to which things are reasoned out •strength of argument •originality  General •structure/organization