HUM101 Chamberlain Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation

HUM101 Chamberlain Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation HUM101 Chamberlain Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation I’m working on a Nursing question and need guidance to help me study. Attached is more instructions that needed to be followed Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity: Textbook: Chapter 8, 9 Lesson Link (Word doc): Source Evaluation Worksheet Minimum of 5 scholarly sources Instructions Use the Source Evaluation Worksheet to submit an annotated bibliography of 5 sources that you intend to use in your paper. Prepare a citation, annotation, and evaluation for each source. You may collect the worksheets together as one document or you may submit a separate worksheet for each source. HUM101 Chamberlain Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation Click on the following link for an example of an annotation. Link: Annotation Example Waite, L. J., Goldschneider, F. K., & Witsberger, C. (1986). Nonfamily living and the erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults. American Sociological Review , 51, 541-554. The authors, researchers at the Rand Corporation and Brown University, use data from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily living by young adults alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations, moving them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They find their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in attitudes about families. In contrast, an earlier study by Williams cited below shows no significant gender differences in sex role attitudes as a result of nonfamily living. HUM101 Chamberlain Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation Writing Requirements (APA format) Length: 100-150 words per source (not including title page or references page) 1-inch margins Double spaced 12-point Times New Roman font Title page Grading This activity will be graded using the Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric. Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 5 Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday Rubric Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 50 pts Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 50 pts Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quantity of Sources 5.0 pts 5 or more sources 4.25 pts 4 sources 3.75 pts 3 sources 3.0 pts 2 sources 0.0 pts 1 or no sources 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality /Reliability of Sources 5.0 pts All works are from scholarly sources. 4.25 pts Most works are from scholarly sources; no more than 1 from a substantive source. 3.75 pts Some works are from scholarly sources; no more than 2 from substantive sources. 3.0 pts Sources substantive or lower in quality. 0.0 pts Few or no sources reach even substantive level; popular sources cited. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Recency of Sources 5.0 pts All sources less than 5 years old; if older, historical significance explained 4.25 pts 1 source older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance 3.75 pts 2 sources older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance 3.0 pts 3 sources older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance 0.0 pts 4 or more sources older than 5 years old w/no explanation of historical significance 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Fluency of Annotations 25.0 pts All annotations comprehensively describe scope source material; clearly conveying main idea and relationship of ideas in source to the topic and thesis of the essay and how source will be used in essay. 21.25 pts Most annotations comprehensively describe scope source material; give sense of main idea and relationship of ideas in source to the topic and thesis of the essay and how source will be used in essay. 18.75 pts Annotations are well-written but do not describe scope of source material; do not give clear idea of how source will be used in essay. 12.0 pts Annotations do not describe scope of source material and/or do not give idea of how they will be used in essay. 0.0 pts Annotations lack detail, give no idea of how they will be used in essay OR no annotations. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA and Documentation 10.0 pts Citations are formatted correctly. 8.5 pts There are a few formatting errors. 7.5 pts There are some formatting errors. 6.0 pts There are many and/or frequent formatting errors. 0.0 pts There is little or no adherence to APA format in the document. phil347_week_5_source_evaluation_worksheet.docx ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Week 5 Source Evaluation Worksheet First read the notes that begin on p. 2 of this handout and the table on p. 3. Then, complete the analysis for each of your sources. 1. Using APA format, identify the source and write a concise annotation that summarizes the central theme and scope of the book or article. A sample annotation can be found in the directions for this assignment. 2. Use the following criteria to evaluate each source: a. How current is this the source you are using? (If not current – explain why information is still applicable) b. How authoritative, credible, reliable? (For example: recognized expert; peer-reviewed journal; trusted site such as .edu, .gov, .mil; experienced and knowledgeable in the field; information consistent across several sources, etc.) c. Briefly state specifically how this source provides evidence that strongly supports your conclusion. For example, “the article discusses significant evidence that this diet provides all essential nutrients and supports my view that the diet is healthy” “this study shows that this diet is deficient in vitamin D and supports my point that this diet is not healthy” “this survey revealed that obesity is on a rapid rise among all demographic groups and supports my view that obesity is epidemic” d. If the information is “popular” or if it is from a blog, from a marketing site, or is persuasive in nature (i.e., an editorial or opinion piece, or a publication of a special interest group such as a trade organization, union, etc.) explain why you are using the source and why you cannot use a more substantive or scholarly source. Evaluating Sources – Notes 1. Rate your journal and periodical sources (whether you are looking at hard copy or on-line) as scholarly, substantive or popular. The Table “Distinguishing between Scholarly and Non-scholarly Periodicals” will work for evaluating either print or on-line journals, newspapers, and periodicals. 2. Beware of bias in any specific article. Determine if the source is authoritative, credible, reliable, current and unbiased. (If not current, then information can be rated “valid, regardless of age,” — i.e., a 1999 web-based article on the American Civil War is not “current”, but can be “valid regardless of age.”) All sources should be authoritative, credible, reliable, current and unbiased. If bias is found, state if bias may or may not affect the credibility and reliability of the information you will use and how you will compensate for possible bias. 3. For websites, generally speaking, .gov and .mil sites are acceptable sources in academic papers. Most .edu websites will be acceptable, but analyze under the criteria in 2 above. 4. If the website is a .com, .org or .biz website, you must further evaluate for authority, reliability and credibility. Never use a .com, .org or .biz site without evaluating across these criteria. Be especially careful about blogs – generally speaking, don’t use them. Many newspaper and magazines also publish to websites; evaluate those just as you would a journal or periodical. a. Authoritative • Who are the author(s)? •HUM101 Chamberlain Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation Are they recognized experts in their field? – check the column or google the author’s name? • What is the level of education of the author? Experience? Knowledge of the subject? • Is the information at a level appropriate to an upper-level academic paper? b. Credible • How does the information compare to other, similar information? Always look for more than one source – verify that all points of view are represented c. Reliable • Is it timely? • Does it come from a trusted source? Distinguishing Between Scholarly and Non-Scholarly Publications Examples Purpose & Use Audience Authors Content & Language Publishers Sources Graphics SCHOLARLY SUBSTANTIVE POPULAR American Journal of Nursing JAMA New England Journal of Medicine American Journal of Kidney Diseases • Knowledge dissemination • Reports of original research • in-depth topic analysis • Statistical information • Reader knows the field (e.g., specialists) • Researchers • Academics • Scholars • Description of research methods with conclusions • Objective • Assumes knowledge of language and specialist jargon • Article may have a specific structure • Usually peer-reviewed • Professional organizations • University or scholarly presses • Research institutions • Includes bibliography and/or notes • Includes extensive citation of sources • Includes author credentials • Includes graphs, charts, and tables • Advertising is very rare National Geographic Psychology Today NY Times The Atlantic Time Vanity Fair Huffington Post USA Today • • For profit Current events and news Introduces a subject Interviews Analysis and opinion General audience • • Journalists Freelance writers Specialists or scholars Explanation of a subject Interpretation of a research article May or may not be objective Use of non-technical vocabulary Shorter articles than in scholarly publications • • • • • • Commercial entities Trade and professional organizations • • Commercial entities Trade organizations • Sometimes includes sources May / may not include author credentials • • Rarely includes citations of sources Rarely includes author credentials Illustrated, often with photographs Advertising is present • • Heavily illustrated Lots of advertising • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • For profit Current events and news Overview of topic Entertainment Sell products General audience Freelance writers Staff writers Journalists May be biased toward a particular point of view Less depth Everyday language Often written like a story … Purchase answer to see full attachment Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Struggling to find relevant content? Order a custom essay on
HUM101 Chamberlain Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation
Let our experts save you the hassle
Order Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with GPA Fix
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
We appreciate every review and are always looking for ways to grow. See what other students think about our do my paper service.
Medicine
This has everything that was in the rubric. Thank you!
Customer 452707, May 29th, 2022
Social Work and Human Services
Excellent Work!
Customer 452587, August 24th, 2021
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Thank you
Customer 452701, November 1st, 2022
Technology
I can work with it and massage it to what I need. Thank You
Customer 452827, July 19th, 2022
Exploring Gender in Science, Technology, and Mathematics
Very good work
Customer 452769, July 2nd, 2022
Nursing
Perfect as usual!!! Thanks team!
Customer 452453, May 26th, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Great Job!
Customer 452587, October 27th, 2021
Other
nice
Customer 452813, June 25th, 2022
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Thanks for the paper. Hopefully this one will receive higher than a C and has followed all guidelines.
Customer 452701, November 16th, 2022
Nursing
Thank you!!!
Customer 452557, June 26th, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Great Work!
Customer 452587, November 2nd, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Great Work!
Customer 452587, August 31st, 2021
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
error: Content is protected !!

Save More. Score Better. Use coupon code SPECIAL for a 15%discount