Find Trends in your Profession
Submission Feedback Overall Feedback Find Trends in Your Profession feedback: Melanda, Overall a good start to the paper. But, no research question. The paper contains good information but contains structural errors. Some grammatical errors: when using the word THIS always include a descriptor, so the reader clearly understands what THIS is. Do not use contractions. Use the format and structure below: Top Trends in Cybersecurity Top Trends in the Cybersecurity Industry (three) Findings An Important Emerging Issue (one of the three) Research Question (Simplify the RQ to focus on an issue as part of the emerging trends) Topic Discussion Answering the Research Question Conclusions You must have at least seven references. Revise the paper in accordance with the feedback and resubmit for grading Otherwise good work, Dr. Wms. 1.1: Organize document or presentation clearly in a manner that promotes understanding and meets the requirements of the assignment.: Paper is not organized logically and appropriately for the task. The thesis may be missing, incomplete, or unclear, making it difficult to follow the progress of ideas from the introduction to the conclusion. 1.2: Develop coherent paragraphs or points so that each is internally unified and so that each functions as part of the whole document or presentation.: The coherence of the paper is weakened by paragraphs that lack topic sentences or supporting details. 1.4: Tailor communications to the audience.: There are some sections of the paper that contain imprecise terms or language 1.5: Use sentence structure appropriate to the task, message and audience.: Some sentence patterns are overused or awkward 1.6 Follow conventions of Standard Written English.: Paper demonstrates generally good usage of grammar, word choice, and spelling. 2.1: Identify and clearly explain the issue, question, or problem under critical consideration.: The research strategy may be limited by a lack of context or may suggest an inadequate understanding of underlying factors. 2.3: Evaluate the information in a logical and organized manner to determine its value and relevance to the problem.: Paper indicates some insight into the choice of information to inform the problem or issue. 2.4: Consider and analyze information in context to the issue or problem.: Analysis may be insufficient to support the paper’s conclusion. 2.5 Develop well-reasoned ideas, conclusions or decisions, checking them against relevant criteria and benchmarks.: There is evidence that the student made some analytical leaps unsupported by fact