[Get Solution] Estimating Models Using Dummy Variables

Instructions: Respond to at least one of your colleagues’ posts and provide a constructive comment on their assessment of diagnostics. Were all assumptions tested for? Are there some violations that the model might be robust against? Why or why not? Explain and provide any additional resources (i.e., web links, articles, etc.) to provide your colleague with addressing diagnostic issues. Student’s response:   Using the General Social Survey dataset (mean AGE = 48.27), this paper will examine the research question: At what levels do varying categories of employment impact the number of hours spent watching television?  This question is answered through the analysis of the scale variable TVHOURS (hours per day watching TV) and the categorical variable WRKSTAT (labor force status).  According to Frankfort-Nachmias et al., (2020) a linear regression analysis is the most suitable mechanism to analyze these two variables.  However, in order to conduct a linear regression between the two variables, several Dummy Variables must be extrapolated from the categorical variable WRKSTAT (Laureate Education, 2016).             The WRKSTAT (labor force status) variable collects responses into one of nine categories.  The values are collected as “WORKING FULL TIME”, “WORKING PART TIME”, “TEMP NOT WORKING”, “UNEMPL, LAID OFF”, “RETIRED”, “SCHOOL”, “KEEPING HOUSE”, “OTHER”, and “NA”.  SPSS allows for the recoding of the WRKSTAT variable into different independent Dummy Variables with WORKING FULL TIME identified as the reference category.  OTHER and NA were removed from this analysis.  Once the Dummy Variables were created they could be used in a linear regression analysis.  The coefficients of the model are identified in Table 1 below.     Table 1. Coefficientsa Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. Collinearity Statistics B Std. Error Beta Tolerance VIF 1 (Constant) 2.312 .170   13.632 .000     parttime .063 .426 .009 .148 .882 .937 1.067 temporary .438 .800 .031 .548 .584 .980 1.020 unemployed 1.951 .535 .207 3.648 .000 .958 1.044 retired .713 .385 .107 1.852 .065 .927 1.079 inschool .617 .615 .057 1.003 .317 .967 1.034 stayathome .723 .444 .093 1.627 .105 .942 1.062 a. Dependent Variable: HOURS PER DAY WATCHING TV               Table 1 provides a visual reference for each of the Dummy Variables created from the categorical variable WRKSTAT (labor force status).  With each of the Dummy Variables represented in the table, interpretation of their relationship to the constant variable (WORKING FULL TIME) can be readily accomplished.  The Unstandardized Coefficients represent a value in reference to the reference category, or constant.  In this analysis, the PARTTIME displays an unstandardized coefficient of .063.  Analysis of this coefficient indicates that compared to the WORKING FULL TIME constant, there is a difference of .063 units in the dependent variable TVHOURS (hours per day watching TV).  Said another way, there is a difference in the amount of television watched of .063 units between part time employment and full time employment.  Further analysis of all Dummy Variables allows for interpretation between the data.  One can recognize that PARTTIME is the closest variable to the constant, and the UNEMPLOYED is the furthest with a difference of 1.951 units.             Testing of the assumptions of multiple regression models is important to ensure proper interpretation of the results (Laureate Education, 2016).  In this model, all assumptions were met with some pertinent assumptions further explained below.  The Analysis of Variance, or ANOVA, output indicated the overall model was significant with a reported value of .011, which falls well below the standard threshold for significance (ASA, 2016).  Diagnostics of the regression model reveals data regarding the assumptions.  The first piece of output is displayed in the Model Summary visualized in Table 2 below.   Table 2. Model Summaryb Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate Durbin-Watson 1 .229a .052 .034 2.211 2.177 a. Predictors: (Constant), stayathome, temporary, inschool, unemployed, parttime, retired b. Dependent Variable: HOURS PER DAY WATCHING TV               In this Table, attention is drawn to the Durbin-Watson statistic.  According to Laureate Education (2016), the Durbin-Watson statistic has values from 0-4.0, and provides information regarding the independence of errors.  A Durbin-Watson statistic of 2.177 indicates there is no correlation between the residuals.  Further, a Durbin-Watson value of less than 1.0 or greater than 3.0 indicates a high probability of serial correlation (Laureate Education, 2016).             Further review of the diagnostics draws attention back to Table 1.  Attention is drawn to the Variance Inflation Factor, or VIF.  As a general rule, VIF values close to 10, and certainly values greater than 10, indicate multi-collinearity within the model.  With the highest VIF level reported as 1.079 from the RETIRED group, and all other groups reported as significantly less than the 10-point threshold, it is certain that the groups have a low level of correlation among each other, which leads to the acceptance of the assumption.             The Cooks Distance examines undue influence, or specific outlying variables that may cause undue influence on the model that may have a significant impact.  According to Laureate Education (2016), a Cooks Distance value greater than 1.0 is considered problematic.  The Cooks Distance values for this model range from a minimum of .000 to a maximum of .424 which is far below the threshold of 1.0.  This allows the assumption that there is no undue influence in the model.  References American Statistical Association. (2016). American statistical association releases statement on statistical significance and p-values.  Retrieved from https://www.amstat.org /asa/files/pdfs/P-ValueStatement.pdf Frankfort-Nachmias, C., Leon-Guerrero, A., & Davis, G. (2020). Social statistics for a diverse society (9th ed.). Sage Publications. Laureate Education (Producer). (2016). Regression diagnostics and model evaluation [Video file]. Author. Laureate Education (Producer). (2016). Dummy variables [Video file]. Author.

Struggling to find relevant content? Order a custom essay on
[Get Solution] Estimating Models Using Dummy Variables
Let our experts save you the hassle
Order Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Get personalized services with GPA Fix
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
We appreciate every review and are always looking for ways to grow. See what other students think about our do my paper service.
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Thank you.
Customer 452701, April 24th, 2023
Thank you for the great services
Customer 452635, April 24th, 2022
Great! Thanks again!
Customer 452707, July 4th, 2022
Awesome work!!!!!!
Customer 452453, March 24th, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Excellent Work!
Customer 452587, November 30th, 2021
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Thanks for the revision. Your support is greatly appreciated.
Customer 452701, August 27th, 2023
Amazing as always!!! :)
Customer 452453, March 16th, 2023
Customer 452813, August 21st, 2023
Thanks for the help, appreciate it
Customer 452821, August 27th, 2022
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Thank you
Customer 452531, May 19th, 2021
As usual, the writers do amazing work.
Customer 452707, October 1st, 2022
Excellent work! Thank you again!
Customer 452707, December 20th, 2022
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Save More. Score Better. Use coupon code SPECIAL for a 15%discount