Discussion: examining issues of quality and access for stakeholders
Discussion: examining issues of quality and access for stakeholders ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Discussion: examining issues of quality and access for stakeholders Please see attached paper and rubric grading and update. Discussion: examining issues of quality and access for stakeholders write a 23-page paper answering the following questions: What role does quality measurement play in assessing the performance of health plans and in assessing the impact of price competition? Would you join a health plan without any information on quality, simply because it had the lowest cost? Why or why not? Refer to what you learned in your research as you answer the following: Should we, as a society, rely on individual choice of high-quality providers? Should we base our decisions on publicly available report cards to improve health-care quality? Should we rely on institutions (government agencies, for example) to mandate and enforce minimum quality standards? Why or why not? How do access, quality, and cost-effective care come together for the benefit of patients? Physicians and providers? Hospitals? Society? ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS Length: Paper must be 23 pages typed and double-spaced, using Times New Roman, 12-point content (length excludes title page, abstract, table of contents, and reference list). References: Cite at least three references. Your references may include both scholarly literature and practitioner sources. Written communication: Writing must be free of errors, scholarly, and consistent with expectations for business professionals. Writing style: APA expectations for scholarly writing include the use of third-person narrative, unless it is awkward to do so. mba_fp6275_assessment5_1.docx Measuring Quality of health Care and Access MBA-FP6275 Measuring Quality of health care And Access Role of quality measurement in assessing the performance of health plans and in evaluating the impact of price competition Quality measurement in health is a process that relies on data collected to measure the performance of the existing health plans and practitioners against the accepted quality standards (Saver et al., 2015). Within the health care context, quality measures may take myriad forms, and these measures can assess care across the full range of health care settings from practitioners working stations to diagnostic rooms within the hospital. Measuring the quality of health care is an essential step for improving the quality of health care offered within various hospital outlets. Typically, states focus on quality measurement as a practical approach for improving overall health care by detecting strategies that enhance health care and factor the disrupt health care improvement (Hanefield, Powell-Jackson & Balabanova, 2017. More so, the quality measure allows holding of health insurance and practitioners responsible for providing quality care (Saver et al., 2015). Discussion: examining issues of quality and access for stakeholders Assessing the quality of health care enables the health care system to address disparities regarding the delivery of care as well as the outcome. In this view, stakeholders rely on data to evaluate the implication of the price competition. However, business competition is encouraged as a mechanism to promote increase value for health care consumers. Presence of competition ensures the patient receives quality services and products that meet their needs. Further, competition in health care plays a crucial role in the reduction of health care cost. It is explicit that competition eliminates inefficiencies, which would otherwise result in high production costs, which transferred to a patient seeking health care services. Would you join a health plan without any information on quality, only because it had the lowest cost? Why or why not? When selecting good medical care, one should focus on getting a qualified physician capable of providing health care services based on his skills and knowledge. Additionally, the best choice for the health plan must locate close to the patient who needs care from up-to-date equipment. Currently, health insurance has imposed a rule that acts as an impediment client and preferred physician as well as a hospital. As an informed person, I would not join a health plan because it has the lowest cost without in-depth information about quality. Inadequate information on quality, it would be difficult to know whether the users satisfaction gets prioritized. Should we, as a Society, Rely on Individual Choice of High-Quality Providers Yes, we as a society should rely on the individual to make choices of high-quality provider. Ability to make choices is what the community wants. Growing cognizance indicate patient should play a critical role in deciding on their care. Further, health care professionals are required to offer choices that can promote and enhance autonomy (Zolkefli, 2017). It arguable that the fundamentals obligations allow the client to have rights to choose as well right to accept or reject information. Should our Decisions be based on Publicly Available Report Cards to Improve Health Care Quality? Health care report cards designed from information gathered from the national survey on quality. The report cards appear to affect health decision making health care providers more than health care users. Growing consensus affirms the public reporting avail information and choices, enabling patient or consumer to choose a higher quality provider. Initiative to make information about health publicly available to media, patient, and policy marker will drive health care providers to strive to offer high-quality care. Should we rely on institutions to mandate and enforce minimum quality standards? Its essential to rely on government agencies to mandate and enforce minimum standards. Involvement of the government in monitoring and controlling of the health can result from cleaning facilities that meet hygiene standards. For instance, the department of health ensures all children are vaccinated to prevent diseases. How do access, quality, and cost-effective care come together for the benefit of patients? Physicians and providers? Hospitals? Society? Establishment of quality primary care is vital for the functioning of an effective health system. Patients accessing to regular primary care practitioners are more likely than clients unable to receive recommended preventive service and timely care for a health condition to experience severe illness and high cost of treatment (Arora, Moriates & Shah, 2015). A patient with a regular doctor experiences fewer preventable emergencies visits as well as reduced hospital admissions. More so greater trust and adherence to practitioners treatments recommendations are associated with fast recovery. For instance, population groups in low-income bracket need access to primary care results to better preventive care as well as control of chronic illness and reduced morbidity and mortality. Ultimately, government efforts to control health care spending demands high stakes. The government initiative to control health care cost require intensive in education and prioritize on pressing societal needs. Discussion: examining issues of quality and access for stakeholders References Arora, V., Moriates, C., & Shah, N. (2015). The challenge of understanding health care costs and charges. AMA journal of ethics, 17(11), 1046-1052. Hanefeld, J., Powell-Jackson, T., & Balabanova, D. (2017). Understanding and measuring the quality of care: dealing with complexity. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 95(5), 368. Saver, B. G., Martin, S. A., Adler, R. N., Candib, L. M., Deligiannidis, K. E., Golding, J., & Topolski, S. (2015). Care that matters: quality measurement and health care. PLoS medicine, 12(11), e1001902. Zolkefli, Y. (2017). Evaluating the Concept of Choice in Healthcare. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences: MJMS, 24(6), 92. You need an introduction and a succinct thesis statement. take a myriad of forms, Give an example of this. Why is it essential? What is its specific purpose? provides feedback that allows holding health insurance and practioners responsible good, but it also identifies weaknesses in the system. What does quality have to do with price competition? Support this. Sometimes competition may cause a provider to cut corners to save cost. Support this. How does it transfer to the patient if the payment is contractual with the insurance company? Why do they need to locate close to the patient? Good, but how does this occur? Give an example of this. How does this affect quality? Providers are users? Why should it be available to the media? The media should not be making health decisions for patients. More depth needed. Support this. Is it just fast recovery? Perhaps it may help to achieve a recovery if caught early enough. Is it just fast recovery? Perhaps it may help to achieve a recovery if caught early enough. Discussion: examining issues of quality and access for stakeholders Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10
