Discussion: Critical Appraisal of A Research Article Analysis

Discussion: Critical Appraisal of A Research Article Analysis ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Discussion: Critical Appraisal of A Research Article Analysis You will need to consider and critically discuss all items on the HLSC641 appraisal checklist, below: Discussion: Critical Appraisal of A Research Article Analysis Do you agree with the rationale for conducting this study? Was the research design appropriate? Were participants recruited in an acceptable way? Was the exposure accurately measured? Was the outcome accurately measured? What were the results and do you believe them (e.g., did the analysis adjust for confounders)? Can the results be applied to the population? Any potential conflicts of interest? Weight: 40% Length: 2100 words ± 10% (including in-text references but excluding the end reference list) Format: Report; 1.5 line spacing Referencing style: APA 6/7 Assessment criteria: Assessment criteria (LO: 3) Standard achieved High Distinction (HD) Distinction (D) Credit (CR) Pass (PA) Fail (NN) Criterion 1 HLSC641 checklist HLSC641 checklist used and all items addressed. No misunderstanding evident. HLSC641 checklist used and most items addressed. No misunderstanding evident. HLSC641 checklist used and most items addressed, but some misinterpretation evident. HLSC641 checklist used and many items addressed, but some misinterpretation evident. Unsatisfactory use of HLSC641 checklist or not used. Or criterion not attempted. Marks 4.25-5 3.75-4 3.25-3.5 2.5-3 0-2 Criterion 2 Study aspects, other than data collection techniques Excellent evidence-based discussion of the different aspects of the chosen study in direct relation to the HLSC641 checklist items (e.g., recruitment strategy), underpinned by the scientific peer-reviewed literature. All critiques include evidence-based discussion. Implications of study aspects sophistically discussed, including internal and external validity. Full understanding evident. Very good evidence-based discussion of the different aspects of the chosen study in direct relation to the HLSC641 checklist items (e.g., recruitment strategy), underpinned by the scientific peer-reviewed literature. Most critiques include evidence-based discussion. Implications of study aspects discussed, including internal and external validity. Comprehensive understanding evident. Discussion: Critical Appraisal of A Research Article Analysis Adequate evidence-based explanation of the different aspects of the chosen study in direct relation to the HLSC641 checklist items (e.g., recruitment strategy), underpinned by the peer-reviewed scientific literature, but some key detail missing and/or lack of clarity in some assertions. Good understanding of study aspects evident but lacking in places. Minimal evidence-based explanation and/or description of the different aspects of the chosen study and/or lacking direct relation to the HLSC641 checklist items (e.g., recruitment strategy), underpinned by the peer-reviewed scientific literature. Some key detail missing and/or lack of clarity in some assertions. Basic understanding of study aspects evident. Unsatisfactory and/or non-evidence-based explanation/description of the different aspects of the chosen study and/or no relation to the HLSC641 checklist items (e.g., recruitment strategy). Key detail missing. Lack of understanding on most aspects of study aspects. Or criterion not attempted. Marks 12.75-15 11.25-12.4 9.75-11 7.5-9.4 0-7 Criterion 3 Data collection techniques Excellent evidence-based discussion in relation to other data collection techniques and associated biases. Validity and reliability are accurately and sophisticatedly-discussed using evidence and implications outlined. Full understanding evident. Very good evidence-based discussion in relation to other data collection techniques and associated biases. Validity and reliability are accurately and thoroughly discussed using evidence. Comprehensive understanding evident. Adequate evidence-based explanation in relation to other data collection techniques and validity and reliability and associated bias but lacks detail in places. Good understanding evident. Partial evidence-based explanation/description in relation to other data collection techniques, validity and reliability, and/or biases. Key detail missing in argument/s and/or minor inaccuracies. Basic understanding evident. Unsatisfactory and/or non-evidence-based explanation/description in relation to other data collection techniques and/or no mention of validity and reliability and/or too many incorrect assertions. Or criterion not attempted. Marks 8.5-10 7.5-8 6.5-7 5-6 0-4 Criterion 4 Scientific writing, formatting, grammar, punctuation, and spelling Very high quality of scientific writing, logical, clear and eloquent; and meets word limit and formatting requirements. There are no errors with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and meaning is easily discernible. The essay reads without interruption. Very good quality of scientific writing, mostly clear, logical and well written throughout, although minor errors evident; and meets word limit and formatting requirements. There are minimal errors with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and meaning is easily discernible. Good quality of writing, logical, albeit unscientific in places (e.g., emotive language); and meets word limit and formatting requirements. There are some errors with grammar, spelling, and punctuation, but meaning is easily discernible. Low quality of writing, unscientific in places (e.g., emotive language), errors in spelling/sentence structure/organisation, but meaning is discernible. Within or close to word limit requirements. Formatting requirements not met. Poor standard of writing with limited logic and constant errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or sentence/paragraph structure. Errors detract significantly, and/or the reader cannot understand, partially or fully, the meaning of what has been written. Word limit and/or formatting requirements have not been met. Marks 4.25-5 3.75-4 3.25-3.5 2.5-3 0-2 Criterion 5 References and referencing References used are credible, relevant, and of high quality. Mixed use of peer-reviewed scientific journal articles, high quality databases, and/or reports. APA 6 referencing is accurate in all instances. All statements of fact and ideas taken from elsewhere are referenced. Multiple sources of data used, mainly peer-reviewed scientific literature. References used are credible, relevant, and of high quality. Mixed use of peer-reviewed scientific journal articles, high quality databases, and/or reports. APA 6 referencing is accurate on most occasions. Almost all statements of fact and ideas taken from elsewhere are referenced. Multiple sources of data used, mainly peer-reviewed scientific literature. References used are mostly credible, relevant, and of good quality. Albeit reliant on one source of references: peer-reviewed scientific journal articles, high quality databases, or reports. APA 6 referencing is accurate on most occasions. Almost all statements of fact and ideas taken from elsewhere are referenced. Good range of references used. Some references used are credible, relevant, and of good quality. Multiple errors in APA 6 referencing. Limited range of references used. Multiple references used are not credible, relevant, and/or of good quality. Multiple errors in APA 6 referencing. Limited range of references used or no references at all. Marks 4.25-5 3.75-4 3.25-3.5 2.5-3 0-2 Overall marks available: 40 marks (40% toward overall unit grade) Discussion: Critical Appraisal of A Research Article Analysis Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Struggling to find relevant content? Order a custom essay on
Discussion: Critical Appraisal of A Research Article Analysis
Let our experts save you the hassle
Order Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with GPA Fix
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
We appreciate every review and are always looking for ways to grow. See what other students think about our do my paper service.
Other
GREAT
Customer 452813, June 20th, 2022
Eng 099
I recveived a B on this paper but I'm not sure why.
Customer 452775, June 18th, 2022
Social Work and Human Services
Great Work!
Customer 452587, September 8th, 2021
Other
GREAT
Customer 452813, June 25th, 2022
DISCUSSION D SCIENCE 210
GREAT
Customer 452813, June 28th, 2022
Other
GREAT
Customer 452813, June 25th, 2022
ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE
great
Customer 452813, June 26th, 2022
Nursing
Not all sources were " American sources" as directed
Customer 452615, September 16th, 2021
Nursing
I appreciate all the hard work. Thank you!
Customer 452525, August 13th, 2021
Nursing
Thank you MyCoursebay team for your support. With your help I got an A for my past courses
Customer 452635, May 7th, 2022
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Thanks for the paper. Hopefully this one will receive higher than a C and has followed all guidelines.
Customer 452701, November 16th, 2022
Nursing
Always perfect!!! Don is the best!
Customer 452453, July 27th, 2021
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
error: Content is protected !!

Save More. Score Better. Use coupon code SPECIAL for a 15%discount