Crisis Management | Get Solution Now

Strategies and elements of a crisis plan should be reviewed periodically to ensure they are up to date and to add possible solutions learned from recent crisis experiences. Evaluating a crisis plan typically involves examination of what went right and what went wrong. Changes that evolve from the evaluation process can include changes in leadership that result from failure to execute strategies and/or legal and ethical issues. Responding procedures may undergo changes because even what went right may be improved upon or expanded. Furthermore, resources may be updated because they are usually problematic for implementing any plan, particularly for a disaster of enormous scope. Financial considerations may be evaluated as well. National, state, and local foundations and government agencies/departments may respond to revisions by providing resources in the form of grants to individuals or organizations. Plans and grants should continually be reviewed and renewed through this cycle of analysis. By Day 4 Post an explanation of the following: Based on your evaluation of strategies and the situation in the Hurricane Katrina natural disaster, explain which strategies you would use and why. Based on your analysis of the Mississippi crisis plan, explain elements of the plan that might be relevant or applicable to surrounding states.

This question was posted on order ID 11***