Constitutional Law | Get Solution Now

Must complete 3 of the 5 questions provided!! Some questions need to have court cases referenced. 2-4 pages per questions. No more than 1700 words per question. Assume that at the beginning of February 2021, Congress passes legislation that requires states to issue mask mandates in order to obtain federal funds to fight the pandemic. This could mean that states will lose billions of dollars in COVID relief if they do not require the masking mandates that Congress has asked for. Assume that South Dakota challenges this legislation in court. How would you analyze the problem?  Consider (a) whether Congress acted constitutionally; (b) what clauses in the Constitution give Congress the power to pass such legislation?  (c) what are the potential problems with this legislation? A complete answer will discuss in detail what the federal government would argue and what the state would argue in response.  Your answer must cite at least three cases to support your argument.  Finally, at the end of the answer, please discuss how you, acting as a Supreme Court justice, would rule in this case.  Your answer should be between 2-5 pages (double spaced) or no more than 1700 words. In 2018, the City of Philadelphia learned that Catholic Social Services, a foster care services provider affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church, would not certify same sex couples as suitable parents for children in the city’s foster care system. After Philadelphia learned about CSS’ policy, the city stopped referring new children to CSS.  The city cited a city law prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.  It updated its 2019 contract with foster care services providers to explicitly forbid such discrimination against potential parents. CSS has brought suit, arguing that Philadelphia’s exclusion of it from the city’s foster care system amounts to religious discrimination in violation of the First Amendment’s protection of free exercise of religion. Two lower courts found in favor of Philadelphia, How would you analyze the problem?  Consider (a) the First Amendment — both in terms of the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause; (b) LGBTQ rights A complete answer will discuss in detail what CSS would argue on appeal and what Philadelphia would argue in response.  Your answer must cite at least three cases to support your argument.  Finally, at the end of the answer, please discuss how you, acting as a Supreme Court justice, would rule in this case.  Your answer should be between 2-5 pages (double spaced) or no more than 1700 words. Assume that in the next month, President Trump grants a presidential pardon to himself for any federal crime he may have committed prior to becoming president as well as any crime he committed during his presidency.  Article two of the Constitution states that the president shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States except in cases of impeachment. What would the Department of Justice argue if they indicted Trump and he invoked his self-pardon?  What would Trump argue in response?  A complete answer will discuss all arguments to support the pardon (including the Constitution and case law) and all arguments against it (using the Constitution and case law).  Your answer must cite at least three cases to support your argument.  Finally, at the end of the answer, please discuss how you, acting as a Supreme Court justice, would rule on the case.  Your answer should be between 2-5 pages double spaced or no more than 1700 words.  During the course of the semester, we have reviewed cases decided by three very different Chief Justices — Chief Justice John Marshall, Chief Justice Earl Warren and Chief Justice John Roberts.  Please discuss how at least two cases (either in a majority opinion or in a dissent) written by each of the Chiefs reveals their judicial philosophy/ world view (i.e., two cases decided by Marshall, two cases decided by Warren and two cases decided by Roberts).  Discuss how each of the Chiefs are similar and how their judicial philosophies diverge.  To make it easier for you, cases decided by Marshall that we reviewed include:  Marbury v. Madison, McCullouch v. Maryland, Gibbons v. Ogden Cases decided by Warren include:  Brown v. Board of Education, Miranda v. Arizona, Opinions written by Roberts include:  Sebelius v. NFIB, Shelby v. Holder, Obergefell v. Hodges (dissent) Your answer should be between 2-5 pages (double spaced) or no more than 1700 words. Throughout the semester, we have seen how current events impacts the Court and how Supreme Court decisions impact current events.  Please discuss at least three cases in which the political climate had an impact on the Court or vice versa.  A successful answer will fully examine the political context in which the case was decided as well as how the decision then had an impact on politics or history. Your answer should be between 2-5 pages (double spaced) and no more than 1700 words.

This question was posted on order ID 11***

Struggling to find relevant content? Order a custom essay on
Constitutional Law | Get Solution Now
Let our experts save you the hassle
Order Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with GPA Fix
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
We appreciate every review and are always looking for ways to grow. See what other students think about our do my paper service.
Other
OK
Customer 452813, July 3rd, 2022
Psychology
Excellent!!!!
Customer 452587, July 28th, 2021
Other
AWESOME
Customer 452813, June 19th, 2022
Other
GREAT
Customer 452813, June 25th, 2022
Other
GREAT
Customer 452813, July 3rd, 2022
Education
Thank you so much
Customer 452631, October 5th, 2021
Nursing
Thank you for the great job and timely delivery.
Customer 452457, December 18th, 2020
Other
AWESOME
Customer 452813, June 25th, 2022
Philosophy
i got the paper a bit late but it is good quality will for sure come back and use this website.
Customer 452611, September 9th, 2021
Nursing
Great paper!
Customer 452707, July 1st, 2022
Social Work and Human Services
Great Work!
Customer 452587, October 13th, 2021
Web programming
thank you so much. This was very helpful and I was able to understand the assignment better after seeing it completed.
Customer 452715, September 22nd, 2022
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
error: Content is protected !!

Save More. Score Better. Use coupon code SPECIAL for a 15%discount