social science

This is a paper of culture and leadership.There should be two culture, please write about Chinese culture and the culture of your own, But in the paper please describe YOUR CULTURE as Chinese culture, and the culture you choose as the culture of your own. For example, you have a Indian culture, you use Chinese as your culture, and use Indian culture as the culture you choose.Details are in the file I attached, please do it as 4-5 pages (There should be a table or chart for part 3)

SOCW 6311 wk 5 assignment: Analyzing Focus Group FindingsImagine that two focus groups have been conducted in an Asian American and immigrant community in a large urban city. The rationale of conducting the qualitative study was because it has been noted that many Asian Americans and immigrants are reluctant to seek mental health services. To further understand this issue, service providers including social workers, counselors, doctors, and nurses were recruited to discuss the barriers in implementing mental health services targeted to Asian Americans and immigrants. After the focus groups were transcribed, two research assistants were hired to conduct a content analysis of the transcripts. Refer to the Week 5 Handout: Content Analysis of Focus Groups.As the social worker, you have been asked to analyze the focus group data and are charged with working with an advisory board in the community to formulate social work practice recommendations using the ecological model.To prepare for this Assignment, review Week 5 Handout: Content Analysis of Focus Groups.Submit a 3-4-page report of the following must have introduction and conclussion : Discuss the themes found in the Week 5 Handout: Content Analysis of Focus Groups. Based on this data, what is your analysis of the current barriers to services?( Handout uploaded)Create two social work recommendations to address a current barrier and explain how the recommendation proposed addresses the findings.Discuss how you would collaborate with the research stakeholders (e.g. service providers and community members) to ensure that the data are interpreted accurately and that the practice recommendations made will be culturally appropriate.Critically reflect on your own culture and explain how your cultural values and beliefs may have influenced how you interpreted the focus group data. What specific cultural knowledge do you think you need to obtain to conduct culturally sensitive research with this group?Support the assignment with references using assigned readings and/or additional scholarly literature.Resources

Describe “The Moral Problem” that Michael Smith lays out in chapter 1 of his 1994 book The Moral Problem. (The problem is very explicitly presented on p12 of this chapter; I want you to put this problem into your own words.)Drawing on the readings for the course, present two different ways of trying to resolve the Moral Problem. (For example, you might discuss those who reject proposition (1) of the Moral Problem, and those who reject proposition (2).)Evaluate which strategy for resolving the Moral Problem is superior. Try to provide reasons for your evaluation.Specs:Your paper should be 900-1100 words (include a word count with your submission).You do not need to include a bibliography; simply reference page numbers where appropriate.Your paper will be marked according to this rubric.Before beginning: (1) read and digest the grader’s comments on your first paper; (2) re-read Jim Pryor’s Guidelines on Writing a Philosophy Paper.

Write a short, objective summary of 250-500 words which summarizes the main ideas being put forward by the author in this selection.SUMMARY “People Or Penguins” By William F. Baxter

Watch the Stanley Milgram Obedience video below (9:54). In your discussion post, answer all the questions posed below.1.What role does authority play in the experiment?2.What would you have done if the researcher said the same things to you? Would you go all the way?3.Do you think this accurately reflects our behavior in groups and organizations? (i.e., Do we blindly follow authority figures?)4.Think of situations where this has occurred. (ex–> Abu Ghraib, Enron, Hazing Rituals, Mai Lai Massacre, etc.) Why did subordinates follow the commands of those in authority in those situations?

Provincial Culturesa. What are “Oral Cultures”?c. What was the Enlightenment?d. Who was John Locke?

theoriesWhat are the 5 components of culture in sociology?What is cultural theory in sociologyWhat are cultural particularities

Encourage Students To Overcome Academic Work Processes By Providing Affordable Assignment Writing Service UK. Our Academic Writers Know The Art Of Creating 100% Unique Content That Helps Students Stand Out in Their Careers.

On Frank Jackson’s argument against Physicalism Length: 4-5 pages double-spaced. Jackson, in his essay “What Mary Didn’t Know”, argues that Physicalism, the view that only physical things exist and that all facts are physical facts. This view is important because if everything is physical, then, the mental is also physical. That means our minds are physical, our thoughts are physical, our feelings are physical.The philosopher David Armstrong is a Physicalist. He accepts that everything that exists is physical and that all facts are physical facts. So he accepts that the mind is physical, our thoughts are physical and that our feelings are physical.Jackson rejects Physicalism. For him, certain things are non-physical. His case involving Mary is supposed to show that certain things are nonphysical. They are distinctly mental, e.g., what coldness feels like and what the color red looks like.Your assignment here is to raise an objection to Jackson’s argument. The paper should have 5 sections.Part I: Introduction For this section, introduce what your paper will be about. It is about Physicalism—the view that the only things that exist are physical things and that all facts are physical facts—and Jackson’s argument that Physicalism is false. State: A: What Physicalism is B: That Jackson, in his paper “What Mary Didn’t Know”, argues that Physicalism must be false C: You will be raising an objection to his argumentPart II: Thesis In this section, state exactly what you will be arguing for. You will be arguing that Jackson’s argument is unsound.Part III: Exposition In this section, provide a complete and accurate presentation of Jackson’s argument. Write out each premise of the argument. Then, provide detailed discussion of each of the premises. Keep in mind, Jackson’s argument is supposed to show that Physicalism is false. So, in order to appreciate his argument, you must have full grasp of what Physicalism is.State the case concerning Mary. How is this case supposed to show that Physicalism is false?Be sure to do this section well. If you hope to raise a serious objection to Jackson’s argument, you must first fully and accurately understand and represent it.Part IV: Criticism In this section, you should: Raise an objection to Jackson’s argument. Then, provide a response to your objection on Jackson’s behalf. If Jackson were made aware of your objection to his argument, what would he say in response? Then, provide a response to his response.Part V: Conclusion Tell us one thing the reader is supposed to have learned from having read your paper.

Consider a South American factory that employs children and adults to make handmade clothing products that are highly valued by tourists and consumers in other countries. The workers make very little money compared to American workers but their wages are competitive in their country. One of the workers, a young widow, occasionally uses leftover material to make clothing for her children. Carefully assess this situation using the theory of Kant and the theory of Mill (Rule Utilitarianism). Compare and contrast the two views, and highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each theory with respect to the problem.in 250-300 words