Social Science homework help

You are an assistant to the Special Agent in Charge (SAC) of the Organized Crime Task Force. The SAC has asked you to go over certain witness-related situations that will be testified to in an upcoming trial. The SAC has concerns about some of the witness testimony and is trying to avoid embarrassment by turning in records that may not be usable by the Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) who is prosecuting the case.

Tommy “Two Toes” D’Natalia has a certified public accountant (CPA). He has been using his accountant to wash ill-gotten gains from his racketeering. The SAC has a subpoena for the CPA. D’Natalia is claiming privileged communication with his CPA, and it prohibits the accountant from testifying.
Luigi “the Pipe” Cardone heard through the grapevine that Big Sal Salvatore has been telling everyone how he was told by Frankie “the Lip” Bonnano that Freddie “Fingers” Malone was murdered by his wife Slippery Sally Genovese-Malone. Cardone wants a deal to testify against Slippery Sally.
Lawrence ‘Lucky’ Livorno drove the getaway car for a jewelry store heist. Bertram “Bugsy” Bertoli and Little Carmine D’Angelo went in and robbed the store. During the robbery, Bertoli shot and killed the store owner. D’Angelo and Livorno both want to testify to avoid the death penalty.
For your assignment, complete the following in 3–4 pages:

Identify which testimony is hearsay and likely to be inadmissible.
Identify which testimony is privileged communication and which is not.
Identify how the Best Evidence Rule functions in relationship to the witness testimony being proffered.

Discussion: Plato and Philosophy

Recent history has shown that the United States certainly has the power (i.e., the “might”) to go into any number of countries and stop human rights abuses, which are occurring in those countries. But having that ability begs the question of how far should the United States go in that role. Are we the world policeman? Are we the world’s peacekeeper? While the United States has unparalleled military power, should we engage without limits?

Based on your readings so far, and thinking about what Plato says in his dialogue with Thrasymachus, discuss the issue of when the ability to do something (the “is”) becomes the right thing to do (or the “ought”). It often helps to think in comparative terms. Think about an example that seems to be similar and use it to explain your points.

Discussion: Aristotle

Imagine you are walking down a dark street one night and suddenly someone jumps out in front of you. He is brandishing a pistol and he says in a menacing voice, “Your money or your life.” From the look on his face, you know he is serious and the pistol in his hand is real.

If you decide to give him your money—your purse or your wallet—what kind of action would this be here? Is this, as Aristotle phrases it, a voluntary or a non-voluntary action? What evidence is there to support your position? Would it matter if he did not have a pistol? Why would this be different?

Discussion: Changing History

Having the advantage of being able to know the past and see its future, offer your thoughts on one of the following questions:

If you had been the leader of the first group of English settlers at Jamestown, what would you have done differently?
If you had been Cortés, what would you have done after arriving at Tenochtitlan?
Be sure to support your initial post and responses with in-text citations from the Background materials.

Once you’ve completed your post, cross-check it against the Discussion Rubric to ensure it meets or exceeds the high-end rubric requirements.

Discussion Expectations:

In each discussion forum, students are expected to respond to the prompt by providing an informed, rigorous, and professional post. The initial post should be at least 150 words. In addition, students are required to respond at least 2 times to their classmates’ posts in a similarly informed, rigorous, and professional manner. Peer replies should be at least 100 words to qualify as substantive. Refer to the discussion rubric for more details.

Discussion: George Washington

Based on the readings and after watching the videos listed below on George Washington, discuss what you think was his single greatest contribution to America.

Make sure that you explain in detail why you think that what you selected was his greatest contribution.

Once you’ve completed your post, cross-check it against the Discussion Rubric to ensure it meets or exceeds the high-end Rubric requirements.

Give the videos a few moments to load.

Washington at Yorktown:
Tiny URL: https://tinyurl.com/ya5q53oe
Full URL: https://www.history.com/topics/us-presidents/george-washington/videos/washington-at-yorktown?m=528e394da93ae&s=undefined&f=1&free=false

Washington’s Legacy:
Tiny URL: https://tinyurl.com/yahogj2v
Full URL: https://www.history.com/topics/us-presidents/george-washington/videos

Discussion Expectations:

In each discussion forum, students are expected to respond to the prompt by providing an informed, rigorous, and professional post. The initial post should be at least 150 words. In addition, students are required to respond at least 2 times to their classmates’ posts in a similarly informed, rigorous, and professional manner. Peer replies should be at least 100 words to qualify as substantive. Refer to the discussion rubric for more details.

EACH DISCUSSION IS ONLY A PARAGRAPH PLEASE PUT DISCUSSION TITLE FOR EACH ONE

For my Op-Ed piece I will be arguing how some Dominicans are against Black Lives Matter, although they are Black as well. I wanted to attempt to tie it back to the history between the Dominicans and Haitians.
If you have any additional sources I would greatly appreciate it.I have included the feedback that so far I received from the professor on the last updated piece, before the final one.

Module 3 – SLP
KANT, MILL, AND ETHICS
Find a moral problem in your place of employment. Tell me about it. What really bothers you and why? It need not be actually happening. The moral problem could be a potential problem, no matter how likely. Be creative. If you can’t think of a real problem you will likely face, make one up.

Tell me what your position on the problem is, and what the relevant utilitarian and deontological considerations are. Who is being, or will be, hurt? Who is being, or will be, benefited? Why, overall, do you think your position on the issue is for the greatest good over the long haul? Whose rights are involved? Who has special duties?

Here are some possible topics:

Privacy in employment tests
Privacy in genetic tests
Privacy in e-mail—should your boss be allowed to read your e-mail?
Safety issues
Fair employment practices (e.g., pay, hiring/firing, benefits)
Racism
Sexism
Discrimination on any unfair basis
SLP Assignment Expectations
If you can’t think of anything good, well, ask! I’ll help you find something fun and interesting.

Write a paper of at least 2 pages and upload it by the end of this module.

The topic is “What are the effects of globalization on development in developing countries in Africa and South America.”
Focus on the economic effects and choose one country in Africa and one in South American to write about.
Please, presenting more in-depth and comprehensive research and analysis of the topic chosen. Written in font size 12 and 1.5 line spacing. The research should be based on appropriate academic materials as well as possible other references (such as media publications, reports by states, International Organizations, NGOs, etc.) with footnotes referring to the specific bibliography throughout the paper.

1. Describe the ethical topic AND a potential ethical dilemma as it relates to the ethical topic/issue
a. Identify the stakeholders who are impacted or who may potentially be impacted by this ethical topic/issue.
b. Identify the legal concerns associated with the topic/issue
2. Explore professional and personal values related to the ethical topic/issue
a. Describe and support a position (values, attitudes, beliefs) on the issue, provide examples supported by current literature
b. Provide an alternative position on the issue, provide examples describing the alternative viewpoint with examples supported by current literature
3. Identify and discuss any new knowledge gained related to the topic/issue.
4. The scholarly paper should be 4-5 pages excluding the title and reference page.
5. Include an introductory paragraph, purpose statement, and a conclusion.
6. Include level 1 and 2 headings to organize the paper.
7. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’) and in a scholarly manner. To clarify I, we, you, me, our may not be used. In addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be used. The exception to this rule is if/when you do the reflective piece as it relates to your position (values) at the end.
8. Include a minimum of (4) professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal references to support the paper (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory) and be less than five (5) years old.
9. APA format is required (attention to spelling/grammar, a title page, a reference page, and in-text citations).
10. Review the originality report, and make any needed changes.
11. Submit the assignment by the posted due date.

Research Paper Guidelines

Students may choose their own topic for the term paper, as long as it is a topic relating to LAW ENFORCEMENT and is discussed in depth within the textbook (while corrections and courts are briefly discussed in the book, they are not law enforcement). Do not write about terrorism or the military. If you are unsure if your topic is appropriate for this course, please ask the instructor. You will receive a failing grade if you turn in a paper with a topic that is not appropriate.
DO NOT INCLUDE AN ABSTRACT PAGE
This paper is to have an introduction, body and conclusion.
Must have at least one citation.
References and citations are to be in APA format. If you have questions concerning APA, please refer to the APA manual on the TU library home page or contact the instructor for assistance.
Paper is to be 3 to 5 pages, double-spaced (at least 900 words, not including the cover page and reference page).
Proper grammar and spelling are required.
Paper must contain a reference list of sources used.
Students can select a topic of their choice. Besides using your textbook as a source, you must also use two other additional outside sources for your paper. For example, you may use the internet, academic journal databases, books, encyclopedias, videos, newspapers, etc.
Papers must be submitted in Canvas, Instructor will not accept papers by email.
Do not use Wikipedia..it is not a credible source.
Do not write in the first or second person perspective, write only in the third person.
There will be no proof-reading on the instructor’s part. Also, what you turn in the first time will be the paper graded by the instructor. There will not be any re-submissions allowed for any reason. This includes turning in the wrong paper, a rough draft or an incomplete paper.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

What are the leading-edge measures/metrics of organizational personnel readiness? The focus of the research is for a non-DOD audience.

My expectations:
– full prose with appropriate use of headings/subheadings, bullets, tables, as needed to convey information;
– provide an overview of what’s trending (and where) as well as what are the major themes or “buckets” within which personnel readiness can/should be categorized;
– describe the intent of key readiness measures – form-follows-function, so it is often more important to understand the why behind the what; and
– include footnotes and/or hyperlinks to the underlying reference materials cited/used.

Do not include:
– non-sourced content which others cannot source or review; and
– solely traditional or staid metrics.

1. After reading Martin Luther’s “Open Letter to Pope Leo X” and Table Talk what were Luther’s main criticisms of the church and how do his beliefs differ from the beliefs of the Roman Catholic Church?

2. After reading The Islamic World and based on your own critical thinking, why do you think the Ottoman and Mughal leaders practiced religious toleration? Was there anything that surprised you about the Islamic Empires or anything that challenged your perceptions or pre-conceived notions of the Islamic world (explain why?)

Question 1
Congress passed the Internal Security Act over President Truman’s veto. Also known as the McCarran Act or the Subversive Activities Control Act, it strengthened laws against espionage, allowed investigation and deportation of immigrants who were suspected of subversive activities or of promoting communism or fascism, and allowed the limitation of free speech for national security reasons. President Truman vigorously opposed the law that he believed “would make a mockery of our Bill of Rights [and] would actually weaken our internal security measures.” In 1993, sections of the act were ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
In an essay, identify what sections were ruled unconstitutional and why.
Question 2
On November 04, 2010, Executive Order 13556 — Controlled Unclassified Information was ordered by President Obama.
In an essay, define EO13556 and three of its components.

Your submission should be at a minimum of 5-6 pages. 4 sources APA