Science

The aim of this project is to find the optimal manufacturing strategy for material removal using CNC milling for range of surfaces.Objectives:Extensive literature review and good understanding of the milling process.Extensive literature review and good understanding of the CNC milling process.CNC milling is essential part of the manufacturing process. When machining programs are generated, a lot of factors need to be taken into account. Depending on the selected parameters, resulting time, surface quality and appearance can vary.In this project optimisation of the material removal process will be developed based on the results from the cutting simulations in CREO (manufacturing model).BEng (Hons) Mechanical and Manufacturing EngineeringBEng (Hons) / MEng Mechanical Engineering.For more information on CNC Milling Optimization read :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNC_plunge_milling

How you would mitigate the effects of climate change.For more information on Effects of Climate Change read this:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_climate_change#:~:text=Climate%20change%20will%20impact%20agriculture,%2C%20pest%2C%20and%20pathogen%20pressure.

For your final essay, I would like you to explore a controversial issue within your field of study, arguing for a potential change or solution to this issue. Consult the list below in order to help guide you and promote creative thinking; however, do not feel restricted to writing about one of the topics if you would prefer to explore another avenue that interests you:Health Sciences: Should parents be required by law to vaccinate their children?Before you begin your essay, you should choose which stance you will take on the topic (i.e., are you for the topic, against it, or some combination of both).Then, develop a strong, specific thesis that argues a specific claim about that topic (i.e., don’t simply argue “I am for ______” or “I am against ______”). Remember that you must argue about a specific change that you want to see happen in order to rectify your issue.To help build the ethos and logos appeals of your argument, you will be required to use at least five sources in your essay.While you may reference sources like personal blogs or Wikipedia in your paper, three of your five sources must be more credible than Wikipedia or a personal blog (e.g., articles and/or images from magazines, journals, or newspapers; books; government websites, etc.).Consider the audience of your essay. Will your reader be receptive to your argument, or will they be strongly opposed to your claims? Your audience’s reaction to your thesis will determine a number of things in your writing, including structure, tone, and evidenceYou should submit a 1,250-word essay (not counting the Works Cited page), typed and double-spaced.Use Times New Roman font in 12-pt size.Format your paper according to MLA or APA guidelines.

watch this video on Youtube: diversity in workplace Rocio Lorenzo. Write a one-paragraph response.  What are your initial thoughts after watching?  What did you learn from listening to her?

In the class: Final Presentations · Discuss the importance design in any network. · Discuss software-defined networking · Work on projects in order to complete the deliverable as necessary. o Have groups check each others layouts for feedback and to help identify errors.

Select a research topic according to your area of interest and Make a research proposal including general background, problem statement, objectives, types of research to be used, the sources of the data, and so forth. 

You have to cover up following things 1; epistemology of research and theoretical underpinning of article 2: research design 3: How well the chosen methodology addresses the questions posed in the articles 4What the articles tell you about human services research

Give some reasons for our knowledge of the solar system has increased considerably in the past few years. Support your response with at least 3 reasons with details regarding concepts from the units learned in this course.

Complete the Social Identity Questionnaire and ask someone from a different cultural background to do the same. Write a 2–to 3-page paper comparing and contrasting your responses to the questionnaire. Social identity theory (SIT) is based on social psychologist Henry Tajfel’s view that a person’s self-concept is based in part on group membership. The premise of SIT is that individual identities develop in the context of social groups of people with similar characteristics who typically share a sense of unity. A related concept is a social category, which is a group of people who may not interact but who share similar characteristics. The creation of group identities can result in “in-group” and “out-group” categorizations, with a tendency to view one’s own group positively. SHOW LESS This assessment requires you to compare aspects of your social identity to those of someone from a different cultural background to gain insights on how social identity can shape personal worldview, experiences, attitudes, and behavior. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Describe the effects of culture, ethnicity, and diversity on the human experience. Describe personal and interviewee responses to the Social Identity Questionnaire. Analyze psychological research findings related to culture, ethnicity, and diversity. Identify possible explanations for the similarities and differences in responses, applying psychological theories or research. Apply psychological theories to issues affecting culture, ethnicity, and diversity. Analyze ways to enhance personal cultural competency. Support analysis by applying psychological theories or research. Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology. Cite scholarly evidence correctly according to current APA guidelines. Write in a manner that is scholarly, clear, and free of grammatical, spelling, and APA formatting errors. Reference Tajfel, H. (1978). The achievement of inter-group differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 77–100). London, England: Academic Press.

Your job is to critique/challenge these research journal articles. Critique the scientific evidence/results, there is an attached “cheat sheet” in which you can refer to on what to critique. The terms (in cheat sheet) may seem confusing to someone without a science background otherwise should be easy to understand if you search the meaning of those scientific terms; variables, external validity etc. These are the links provided to the journal articles you have to critique. (You don’t need to critique all of them, as long as you have about 275 words then should be fine.) – https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00266-015-0592-7 – https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00266-016-0715-9 – https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0091217417703287 – https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S174868151830250X – https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1748681517304709 – https://europepmc.org/article/pmc/pmc7209878