Political science

best and worst case rulings of the supreme court and why for the cases provided by the professor. Assigned best case brown V. Board of education and worst San Antonio independent school district V. Rodriguez which said that education is not protected under the constitution and allowed funding to to be pushed more to privileged schools rather than areas of poverty. The required length of the paper is 5-6 pages. APA style citations are required and use Times New Roman 12 font, double spaced and 1-inch margins.

In recent years, a number of judges have been accused of being “judicial activists” (p. 281). What is meant by this? Please research this concept and explain why do some criticize the idea of activist judges? Please strive for some significant substance in your answer TEXT BOOK :: American Government and Politics Today: Essentials 2015-2016 Edition By: Barbara A. Bardes

Guiding question: How does racial capitalism work to obscure cross-racial solidarities? How have cross-racial solidarities formed, in spite of this? What is required for racial solidarities? What have historical forms of cross-racial solidarities looked like? What might cross-racial solidarities look like today? Taking into consideration the readings from Robinson, Liu and Shange, and the Letters for Black Lives Collective, as well as previous weeks’ readings, reflect on this question using 250 words minimum (you may go over!) and produce at least two questions or connections to other readings, personal experiences, contemporary politics, other parts of history, or pieces of pop culture.

There are a list of global challenges you can choose from and you will write a report based on your analysis of the challenge. The report will have 2 aspects to it. First, you will provide a descriptive summary of the state of play for your challenge. This will require you to do some research on the nature of the problem and follow your global challenge in the news media. Second, focus on answering the following questions as much as possible. Not all will be relevant for all the challenges. Pick a few that applies to your choice. • What is the problem? • Why is it a challenge? • Who does it affect? • What is being done to address the challenge? o What are states doing? o What are non state actors doing? o Are current solutions working? If not, why? • What has happened regarding your global challenge recently? • Suggest policy solutions to the challenge. Note: This assignment is not designed to test your understanding of international relations theories or conceptual frameworks of any kind. It is instead meant to test your ability to analyze contemporary global challenges and/or your capacity to produce tangible policy formulations and recommendations.

In your opinion, what were the advantages of Western style Democratic Republics (such as those in the U.S., Europe, and Australia) that allowed them to defeat the Totalitarian regimes of the Fascists/Nazis in 1945, and to win the “Cold War” against the communist bloc in 1991? What are some of the features of each of these societies (including those of “everyday living”) that might entice an individual to become a part of either type of society? What are some of the aspects of both that you believe would repel a person from being a member of each type of society?

Please post your thoughts on the following questions to the discussion board. There is no word limit, but your discussion post should reflect your understanding of the course materials and critical thinking.1. Which of the Page’s Principles do you agree with most?Page’s Priniciple: https://page.org/site/the-page-principlesTake a look at the recent campaigns and find an example that adheres to or violates the Page principles. Elaborate on your reasons.(7 pts.)Where to find good PR cases? Check these places to keep you updated on PR trends:https://www.prweek.com/us/newshttps://www.prdaily.com/2. Search for public relations jobs or internships online (e.g., LinkedIn). Do you find a position that’s interesting to you?  Can you transfer the skills you learned in other communication fields to fulfill the job requirements? If not, what additional PR skills do you need to pick up? (5 pts)Follow the instruction, and write 1-2 thoughtful paragraphs

Make sure it’s a discussion please.Here’s what you want to do in this discussion board forum:Original Post: In your original post, kindly answer the following question: what is Dr. King’s justification for breaking the law?  Specifically, what is his fundamental argument, who are the thinkers that have influenced his view, why is now the time to break the law, and what does he say to those who oppose his view.  Significantly, you’ll want to focus on the main theme of his letter: what is his MORAL argument for breaking the law?Peer Responses: Read over all of your peers’ original threads.  Reply to any two of your peers’ threads.  Focus your replies on your peers’ major themes and the specific ways in which your peers’ threads compared and contrasted with your own original thread.

Evaluate the extent to which  the US is no longer a federal systemEvaluate the extent to which Congress is no longer an effective bodyEvaluate the extent to which the Supreme Court is PoliticalEvaluate the extent to the Office of US President is now ImperilledEvaluate the extent to which the US  Supreme Court upholds civil rightsEvaluate the extent to which Congress is a representative bodyUse the essay structure attached

ANSWER ONE OF THE FOLLOWING PROMPTS.In your answer, demonstrate that you have paid attention to and reflected upon the material in the readings. (attached below as PDF)note: you don’t need to use all of the attached sources, only what is necessary. please only use the primary sources attached. no secondary/outside sources allowed.TOPIC ONE.Constitutional War Powers and the Question of Time. Throughout American history, the political system as grappled with the possibility that urgent, quick action might be necessary to safeguard U.S. territory and lives. Such arguments usually conclude that presidents must be equipped, legally and technologically, to act “with dispatch” because Congress, as a collective body, is less able to do so. And yet, Congress has been able to act quickly in emergencies. And it is easy for a set of events to be characterized as an emergency when in fact there is no imminent threat to Americans or to our essential national security interests.A. How should the system work to ensure timely legitimate responses to threats? Using evidence from the readings from the founding period, make an argument about how the Constitutional system as initially designed and intended was supposed to handle the questions above. Critique the founding setup, and make an argument about whether the initial system is ideal, or if not, how the system should, in your opinion, address the question of timeliness.B. How has the system worked to ensure timely legitimate responses to threats? Go over the cases that we studied in class. Find at least one case that exemplifies the way you think the system should work, and at least one case that exemplifies the way you think the system should not work. Why did the constitutional processes work well or poorly in these cases? What does that tell us about how the constitutional system deals with real world foreign policy challenges?C. How can we make it work better?  What are the barriers to the constitutional system operating the way you think it should? What political, social, rhetorical, or policy solutions might help produce more processes that look like the one you prefer, while discouraging processes that look like the ones you do not prefer.TOPIC TWO.Checks and balances in war powers will never be resolved solely by the courts. They will be adjudicated in part based on the political interactions between the president, the Congress, and the public. How can a partisan political system, and a largely ignorant American public, make this system work in a responsible way?A. Using specific examples from the readings, describe what you see are any strengths, and what you see as any deficiencies, in the way partisanship affects constitutional reasoning and American political development in the authority to use military force at home and abroad.B. Assuming that political parties are inevitable in elective democracies, do you think that the design of our constitutional system adequately balances, constrains, and legitimizes the use of force? Are there any constitutional changes that might better take political partisanship into account when legitimizing the use of force? C. Assuming no actual changes to the constitutional system are made, make a normative argument about how we, as Americans, and as partisans, should act so that we can responsibly authorize the use of force under the Constitution now and in future generations.

Why it is critical to view Canada as a settler-colonial state?You must use a minimum of 4 readings, two of the class reading should be used.Class readingsWolfe, Patrick. “Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native.”Journal of Genocide Research 8, no.4 (2006): 387-409Chapter 4 Wood, Ellen M. Empire of Capital. London: Verso Press, 2003.Does the Colonial Exist? Memmi, Albert. The Colonizer and the Colonized.London: Souvenir Press, 1974