Political science

There is a list of global challenges you can choose from and you will write a report based on your analysis of the challenge. The report will have 2 aspects to it. First, you will provide a descriptive summary of the state of play for your challenge. This will require you to do some research on the nature of the problem and follow your global challenge in the news media. Second, focus on answering the following questions as much as possible. Not all will be relevant to all the challenges. Pick a few that apply to your choice. • What is the problem? • Why is it a challenge? • Who does it affect? • What is being done to address the challenge? o What are states doing? o What are nonstate actors doing? o Our current solutions working? If not, why? • What has happened regarding your global challenge recently? • Suggest policy solutions to the challenge. Note: This assignment is not designed to test your understanding of international relations theories or conceptual frameworks of any kind. It is instead meant to test your ability to analyze contemporary global challenges and/or your capacity to produce tangible policy formulations and recommendations.

I have to write a 500-word Discussion on The meaning of Political.   What is political? Using the course textbook, the film below, any additional sources, and personal experiences we will work together to construct a definition of the term “political”. We hear the term thrown around all the time, but what does it really mean? Have you ever heard of the phrase “the personal is political”? Let’s take this deep dive together to construct a linguistic foundation for our course.  Chapter 1  https://openstax.org/books/american-government-2e/pages/1-1-what-is-government It will be nice if you can bring up the current problem with the BLM movement, women’s rights. Respond directly to the prompt.  Reference the course textbook in the body of your response.  Provide a minimum 500 words. The prompt https://youtu.be/Zkfg2cdX844

this is a public policy course: policy implementation at a graduate level. I have provided all the resources needed for the assignment Decide on a critical policy issue (for example, the need for a particular policy, the need for the elimination of a particular policy or the modification of a particular policy) and write a policy memorandum. Writing the Policy Memo – Instructions  Reason for Writing: A policy memo is a practical document written by professionals in particular fields, scholars or a stakeholders including private citizens and members of nonprofit organizations and think tanks with vested interests in the subject of the memo. Usually, a policy memo advocates for some change, although the writer could also argue for the status quo. Either way, all feasible approaches should be acknowledged and analyzed. Audience for Policy Memo: Typically, policy memos are sent to people who are responsible for making, interpreting or implementing policy at various levels of the government, government agencies and for-profit and nonprofit organizations which must comply with mandates.    Length of Policy Memo: A policy memo can be written in a few pages or 100 pages or more, depending upon a host of factors including the goal in writing the memo, the complexity of explaining research/data access methods, controversy surrounding the topic (some issues require the consideration of a great number of points-of-view regarding problem and solution).  For the purpose of this assignment, the memo should not exceed ten (10) pages including citations.  Qualities of a Good Policy Memo: Professional/academic writing. Simple, grammatically correct, straight-forward language, that is, language devoid of “fancy,”  “folksy,” jargonistic or personal expression (unless relevant to the topic under review). Sustained Focus on Objective. Goal is to convince the audience that a problem exists, validity of analysis and policy recommendations. Everything said should support credibility. Avoid digression.  Evidence-based.  Clear evidence that a problem exists or will exist if the status quo is not maintained and that recommendations made in memo make most sense.  Use of evidence, as well, to dispatch opposing alternatives. Evidence provided in memo to support argument and discount opposing arguments should be characterized by explicit criteria. A cost-benefit analysis can add credibility to the argument.  Good Structure. Example of memo structure appears below. Whatever “system” is used to structure the memo, there should be an explicit structure or plan with logical sequence from topic to topic and use of transitions between topics. Good Presentation. Uniform type style; Consistent approach on titles, subtitles and indentation. Proper citation of sources. Compliance with the APA (American Psychological Association) style guide. Practicality and Feasibility.  Problem addressed should be a real, existing problem which, if eliminated, would substantially improve people’s lives. The recommendations in memo should be practical and feasible and better than other feasible approaches. Resources:  https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/policymemo http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/36824/11-479Spring-2004/OcwWeb/Urban-Studies-and-Planning/11-479Spring-2004/Assignments/index.htm http://www.fao.org/3/i2195e/i2195e03.pdf http://www.fao.org/3/i2195e/i2195e03.pdf

Instructions: Address each prompt in the worksheet in at least 100 words each. While GCU style format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using GCU documentation guidelines, which can be found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.    The Legislative Branch: Senators and Representatives Research a member of the U.S. Congress, preferably a Senator or Representative from your state or district. For the purposes of this assignment, choose a Senator or Representative who has served at least two terms, or is currently serving a second term. Briefly explain the following information about his or her role in government: 1.      Research the selected legislator’s congressional performance and briefly describe information such as attendance in congressional sessions, voting history, bills sponsored or proposed, committee membership, and frequency of committee meetings. What is your perception of how effectively this person performs the expected congressional duties and responsibilities?       2.      Describe your legislator’s time spent campaigning and fundraising. Include information such as how many fundraisers attended in the last year, what type of fundraisers attended, the cost of the last election campaign, sources of campaign funds, and any additional pertinent information. What is your perception of the time spent campaigning and fundraising, and what effect do these activities have on governing?         The Judicial Branch: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Research a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Briefly explain the following information about his or her role in government: 3.      Research the duties and responsibilities of your justice. Consider information such as biographical information, which president nominated the justice and when, responsibilities a U.S. Supreme Court Justice has in addition to hearing cases, opinions this justice handed down, including any dissenting or concurring opinions. What is your perception of the importance and effectiveness of the justice you selected in the role of government?     4.      Supreme Court Justices must be nominated to their positions by a sitting President, and the Senate votes whether to confirm the nominations. Before the confirmation vote, the Senate Judiciary Committee reviews the nomination and then holds confirmation hearings. Describe any controversy surrounding the confirmation process such as concerns about the nominee’s background, ideology, and qualifications. Besides the nominee, who else testified before the Judiciary Committee during the confirmation process? How did politics influence the nomination and confirmation of the justice you selected?     The Executive Branch: The President of the United States Research the current or a former President of the United States who held office after World War II. Briefly explain the following information about the President’s role in government. For the purposes of this assignment, choose a President who was re-elected to the office after the first term. 5.      The President’s responsibilities are included in Article II of the U.S. Constitution, in addition to many unofficial and ceremonial responsibilities. Describe three to five specific duties and responsibilities fulfilled by the President, you chose to research. You must include at least one responsibility as defined in Article II and at least one unofficial or ceremonial duty. How important are these duties and responsibilities governing the country? How effectively do you think the President you selected performed the duties and responsibilities you described?     6.      Research time the President spent campaigning and fundraising, particularly for re-election. Consider information such as how many and the types fundraisers attended, the cost of election and re-election campaigns, sources of campaign funds, and any additional information you consider pertinent. What is the effect and what are some changes, if any, of campaigning and fundraising while governing as the President of the United States?     The Three Branches: Balancing Power 7.      Compare the duties and responsibilities of the Legislator you chose with the duties and responsibilities of the Supreme Court Justice and the President you selected. What ways do the duties and responsibilities of the legislator, the justice, the President, and their respective branches of government, interact with one another today? How effectively do the branches interact? What differences might there be between how the branches should interact and how the branches currently interact?         8.      How does the system of checks and balances serve to limit the concentration of power in the federal government? Cite specific ways the Legislator and The legislative branch, the President and the Executive branch, and the Supreme Court Justice and Judicial branch of government limit power of each of the other branches.

Cultural intelligence resides in the body (physical), heart (emotional/motivational), and head (cognitive). Cultural intelligence is developed through emotional and motivational means by having confidence to understand, embrace, and adapt to a new culture. In addition, cultural intelligence is developed through cognitive means by observing, critically analyzing, and learning about other cultures. Finally, cultural intelligence is developed through physical means by using senses and adapting movements to blend in. As a practical example, it is very common in many cultures to kiss and hug when greeting one another, while in other cultures it is disrespectful to show familiarity to a person by touching them. By understanding and embracing other cultures, it becomes easier to lead a diverse group of employees. Click on the link below to take a short cultural intelligence survey: https://www.internhq.com/blog/quiz-how-culturally-intelligent-are-you/ After you complete the survey, you will receive your results. the results I got were “I am a cultural intelligentsia” due to the survey I am this and I am naturally diverse. I explore my passions and works really well in a diverse setting. SLP Assignment Expectations Reflect upon your results and write a 1- to 2-page paper discussing the results and how you will use them to become a more effective leader. Copy and paste the green image indicating your cultural intelligence score to your paper.

this is a public policy course: policy implementation at a graduate level. I have provided all the resources needed for the assignment Decide on a critical policy issue (for example, the need for a particular policy, the need for the elimination of a particular policy or the modification of a particular policy) and write a policy memorandum. Writing the Policy Memo – Instructions  Reason for Writing: A policy memo is a practical document written by professionals in particular fields, scholars or a stakeholders including private citizens and members of nonprofit organizations and think tanks with vested interests in the subject of the memo. Usually, a policy memo advocates for some change, although the writer could also argue for the status quo. Either way, all feasible approaches should be acknowledged and analyzed. Audience for Policy Memo: Typically, policy memos are sent to people who are responsible for making, interpreting or implementing policy at various levels of the government, government agencies and for-profit and nonprofit organizations which must comply with mandates.    Length of Policy Memo: A policy memo can be written in a few pages or 100 pages or more, depending upon a host of factors including the goal in writing the memo, the complexity of explaining research/data access methods, controversy surrounding the topic (some issues require the consideration of a great number of points-of-view regarding problem and solution).  For the purpose of this assignment, the memo should not exceed ten (10) pages including citations.  Qualities of a Good Policy Memo: Professional/academic writing. Simple, grammatically correct, straight-forward language, that is, language devoid of “fancy,”  “folksy,” jargonistic or personal expression (unless relevant to the topic under review). Sustained Focus on Objective. Goal is to convince the audience that a problem exists, validity of analysis and policy recommendations. Everything said should support credibility. Avoid digression.  Evidence-based.  Clear evidence that a problem exists or will exist if the status quo is not maintained and that recommendations made in memo make most sense.  Use of evidence, as well, to dispatch opposing alternatives. Evidence provided in memo to support argument and discount opposing arguments should be characterized by explicit criteria. A cost-benefit analysis can add credibility to the argument.  Good Structure. Example of memo structure appears below. Whatever “system” is used to structure the memo, there should be an explicit structure or plan with logical sequence from topic to topic and use of transitions between topics. Good Presentation. Uniform type style; Consistent approach on titles, subtitles and indentation. Proper citation of sources. Compliance with the APA (American Psychological Association) style guide. Practicality and Feasibility.  Problem addressed should be a real, existing problem which, if eliminated, would substantially improve people’s lives. The recommendations in memo should be practical and feasible and better than other feasible approaches. Resources:  https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/policymemo http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/36824/11-479Spring-2004/OcwWeb/Urban-Studies-and-Planning/11-479Spring-2004/Assignments/index.htm http://www.fao.org/3/i2195e/i2195e03.pdf http://www.fao.org/3/i2195e/i2195e03.pdf

Find a recent article (less than one month old) from a reputable news source concerning a Free and Fair Trade issue between at least two countries. Summarize the article. What is the issue? Explain why this issue is important to the global community. Evaluate the source. What is your opinion? More pain than gain: How the US-China trade war hurt America https://brook.gs/2DkQwNJ

Write an essay analyzing the contemporary relationship between Western powers and the Middle East. I left three chapter you have to read and three videos. I left the file in the desription of the guidelines and chapters and videos.

write about 3 different Supreme Court Cases that took place in the last 20 years.   What was the name of the case? What was it about? (Provide some detail)  What was the final vote?  Do you support or oppose their decision?   Why? This is going to be my final for my POS 2041  The essay that I’m looking for. I’m going to give you the three court cases listed below with these court cases you’re supposed to say the name of the case what is it about (please write as much as you want)  what was the final vote some information of the final vote. And “do you personally Oppose or support their decision” and finally your “honest opinion” about why you picked this court case …… you are supposed to do this for each one of the court cases is that a list below  The structure that I gave you is eight pages so more or less you can write two pages about each court case in these two pages include the name of the case what was it about? what was the final? vote do you support or oppose their decision? and your honest opinion about why you picked the court case? And the other two pages and One could be your work cited which is to be six sources and the other page is for your introduction or conclusion  I have required you 6 sources so I suggest 2 sources per case it’s up to you Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 2010 (5-4 decision) Corporations and unions can spend unlimited amounts in elections. Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89 (2007) Apple v. Pepper is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 13, 2019, in which the court ruled that those who purchase apps through Apple’s App Store are direct purchasers and can, therefore, sue Apple for allegedly monopolizing the market and increasing prices. The structure that I would like you to use  The introduction you can see how the Supreme Court’s or a very important role in today’s day and age and forever will be and whoever is sitting in that court ultimate makes the final decision over the whole entire United States…………………. Then you start talking about citizens United versus federal election commission. you write out the court case name. what the court cases about? What was the final vote? And do you personally support or oppose their decision? And then after that your honest opinion on why you picked this one?   What I’m suggesting is that you use two Citations per court case  Then you start talking the Second court case Erickson  v. pardus you write out the court case name. what the court cases about? What was the final vote? And do you personally support or oppose their decision? And then after that your honest opinion on why you picked this one?   What I’m suggesting is that you use two Citations per court case  Then you start talking about the third court case Apple v. pepper. you write out the court case name. what the court cases about? What was the final vote? And do you personally support or oppose their decision? And then after that your honest opinion on why you picked this one?   What I’m suggesting is that you use two Citations per court case  Then you write a conclusion if you want or if you need it  And last but not least the work cited page  This is my final please message me any concerns  Some extra notes please do not use Wikipedia Write about two pages Worth information per court case If I can recommend some websites on I would use  oyez.com Or  Supreme.justia.com  Or any reputable sources  Like the New York Times  The Washington Post *As per the Paper Assignments:             A)        Paper has to be 6 pages long             B)        It has to be double space and one-inch margins on all sides             C)        It has to be typed in Times New Roman Font (12)             D)        Written in MLA format with endnotes             E)        Needs to have at least 6 citations from  6 different reputable sources within your paper.  No Wikipedia is allowed.

Please discuss how executive power is useful and can be used in domestic and foreign policy to advance the needs and goals of the American people. Full Prompt:  Is inherent executive power useful for the safety and happiness of the people? Address either the president’s role in foreign policy or a domestic role and his constitutional responsibility to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” (Art. II, sec. 3)