Political science

I WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH THE ARTICLE  DO NOT GO OVER 1 PAGE EVEN IF ITS JUST A LITTLE  THE ARTICLE GIVEN IS THE ONLY SOURCE THAT SHOULD BE USED  PLEASE FOLLOW ISTRUCTIONS TO A T  The reading reviews are brief critical reviews of the assigned readings.  They should include a succinct summary of the main argument(s) made by the author(s).  They should also include your critical analysis of the readings.  In your critical analysis, questions you may wish to consider include, but are not limited to, the following: What is the main theoretical contribution of this article?  How does it fit into the overall themes of the course and/or the specific theme of the week?  How well does the article integrate theory and empirical data?  What do you consider to be the main strengths and weaknesses of the article?

Contrast communitarianism with a more individualistic theory such as John Rawls. How would a communitarian respond to such an individualistic theory? This paper is supposed to be an interpretation of some aspect of the works, in other words, an argument concerning some aspect of the work based on analysis of relevant textual evidence. This paper is not supposed to be a summary of the work, a statement of your opinion about the work, or a discussion of its historical significance or relevance. Frame this paper as an investigation of why and how the author makes the argument he or she does rather than simply saying what is said. Turn the topic into an argument.  Must include a clear statement of your argument, provide relevant evidence, reasoning, and clear writing, demonstrate an understanding of the work.  Cite the works by page numbers in parenthesis after the relevant reference or quotation. If it is clear what work you are quoting from, simply put the page number in parentheses. If you need to clarify which work you are using, simply add the author. You do not need to cite the specific edition of these works or include a bibliography unless using other sources. I have attached the powerpoints and readings with all the info.

Discuss the nature of China’s Belt & Road initiative, where it is happening, what the Chinese are trying to accomplish, and what its implications are US interest in South East Asia (Indochina countries)436806a few seconds agoI have issue uploading a documents. Hope it solve soon.

Discuss the problematic relationship that Italian American women writers/poets/filmmakers/performers reveal with their cultural tradition. How does this cultural tradition define women within the bounds of the domestic space and how do the women artists and writers depict and react to the domestic space and to the traditional role of woman? Discuss how the Italian American women must negotiate between the public and private spheres, between the family and the individual, between self-denial and self-affirmation. In the paper, you may also wish to consider how the cult of the Virgin (the figure of the “Madonna”), which shapes definitions of femininity in Italian American culture, has had tremendous repercussions on external perception and self-representations of women. How do the Italian American women writers/filmmakers/pop artists that we have treated in the latter part of the course respond and react to this iconic image Helen Barolini: “How I Learned to Speak Italian” (see also interview in video “Women’s History Month” Louise De Salvo: from “A Portrait of the Puttana as a Middle-Aged Woolf Scholar” and from “Vertigo” Daniela Gioseffi: “Bicentennial Anti-Poem for the Italian-American Women” (see also interview in video “Women’s History Month”) Sandra Gilbert: “Mafioso” Madonna: “Like a Virgin” and “Like a Prayer” Lady Gaga: “Eh, Eh (Nothing Else I can Say)” Nancy Savoca: True Love

Make an essay about this topicÑ Why was Cuba such an area of concern for President Kennedy? What were his policies toward Cuba, and what were the results? Your essay HAS TO BE 5 paragraphs in length. You MUST include an introduction AND a conclusion. The textbook provided is the ONLY source required for this essay.

Essay prompt: For this reflection essay, discuss this quote from A.C. McKeil’s 2017 e-ir essay, “A Brief Introduction to the Study of International Relations” : What Ken Booth (2014) calls ‘big and important problems’ are first and foremost what brings most students to IR. Every student will have a real-world issue or concern that s/he brings to the study, and which she can make her/his specialty. It is these personally recognized public problems that make the intellectual world of IR visible to the student. It is from these problems that the questions spring. Why are these problems going on? Must they? Or, can they be otherwise? Something I have always felt is close to the spirit of studying IR, is the drive to “make the world a better place”, to address the big and important problems of the world, to throw ourselves at their betterment. The study of IR is first and foremost a study, an intellectual activity, with an intellectual world, but awareness of it and interest in it comes from real-world problems… International problems are the reason why we get to the international questions.  All other  requirments are in attached files, please notice that the sources cited/referenced are to be strictly limited to: (A) required: Ch. 1 of Jackson, Sorensen and Moller (2019); and A.C. McKeil (2017); and (B) optional: any other additional readings listed on the course syllabus;, i provided all those PDFs.  i uploaded optional refrences which are in PDF formats, and other optional refrence are links to websites, so i took screenshot of it’s link name and uploaded as jpg files, if you need them you can search in google. it’s only 4 pages but has to be a very decent paper. thank you

Question: Write an argument supporting to what extent one can separate between reason and faith in determining the question of political governance?  Structure of the paper: a) brief introduction; b) argument; c) brief conclusion  Paper Length- 1-page (excluding the bibliographical page), typed and single spaced. The paper should utilize the Turabian publication style (adoption of Chicago Manual of Style), in documenting the footnotes and the bibliography. Plagiarism may result in an “F” in the course The question in the picture may be close to what the professor is trying to say above thanks

create a question have the literature review be based off the question How to treat your sources in order to squeeze the relevant info and write your LR? (Adapted from your Workbook, Mycoff, Jason D. 2019. Working with Political Science Research Methods – Problems and Exercises, 5th ed. Washington, D.C.: Sage/CQ Press Collect scholarly articles that address the research question’s content Start organizing your articles for your literature review by taking notes on each resource, for instance, in a table. Your table will include notes on each of your sources. Notice that each cell includes important information about one article. Each cell will include (among others): the parenthetical citation in bold to identify the article, notes about the article’s title the research question the time period studied the unit of analysis and sample size of the study, the jurisdiction (state, county, state, country, world region, world. other?) of interest whether the study took a quantitative or qualitative approach (how scholars have made empirical observations) the research design the article’s conclusion. 4. Answer the questions by comparing and contrasting the notes on the sources against each other: Based on your notes above, what are the questions that are asked and answered in the literature, and what questions seem to have been ignored so far? Which periods have scholars studied? Why? How relevant is it? What’s missing? Which jurisdictions have been on the radar of scholars? Why? How relevant is it? What’s missing? Which research designs were used by the research teams to study the topic at hand? Here an example from the Workbook as we will discuss the methodology in class next week: “Scholars have used different research designs to observe and analyze national and subnational variation in the causes of political violence. While many have used cross-sectional analyses (Eck 2014; Fox 2004; Muller 1985; Fearon and Laitin 2003), cross-sectional time series analyses (Pearce 2005), or fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (Ida 2015) to understand national variation in the causes of political violence, other scholars have used case studies (Homer-Dixon 1994; Welsh 2016) to analyze subnational variation.” Points of agreement: What are the conclusions shared by more than one scholar? Points of disagreement: What are the conclusions that run counter to another conclusion? 5. After you have answered the questions , consider how you could combine the sentences you wrote into a literature review. Finally, you’ll add (see the doc A Guide to Writing Literature Reviews in Political Science and Public Administration Department of Political Science UNC Charlotte, 2006): what parts of all the info found are most valuable and important how future research could be conducted to have the most substantial influence on the field.

Choose any ONE of the following topics for your research paper.  It is not necessary to email me which topic you chose, but you must write about one of these topics from the list below:1. What caused European colonialism, who were the major colonial empires, and what was the impact of colonization on India, South Africa, and Indonesia?2. What is the Israeli-Palestinian conflict about? What are the motivations and strategies of the actors involved, and how has that conflict affected (or might affect) international relations broadly?3. How and why did Russia annex Crimea from Ukraine? How has the conflict between Russia and Ukraine affected the region and international relations broadly? Be sure to include the effect it has had on U.S.-Russian relations.4. How have human rights affected international politics? What state and non-state actors have had the most direct impact on expanding international human rights? What role have human rights considerations played in the formulation of American foreign policy?5. Why has North Korea pursued nuclear weapons and how has that affected its relationship with South Korea, China, and the United States? Provide an overall analysis of U.S. foreign policy toward North Korea.6. Choose a country in South America and describe the relationship between that country and the United States. How has that relationship evolved and what is the current status of that relationship? What role does that South American country play in regional politics and more broadly in international politics?7. What role does the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the primary judicial branch of the United Nations, play in international politics? What supranational powers, if any, does the ICJ possess? How have recent political trends affected the ICJ and other international organizations8. Choose a country in Africa and describe the relationship between that country and the United States. How has that relationship evolved and what is the current status of that relationship? What role does that African country play in regional politics and more broadly in international politics?9. Describe the historical relationship between the United States and France. How has that relationship evolved over the years? What is the current status of the relationship between the U.S. and France? What role does France play in regional politics and more broadly in international politics?10. Describe the historical relationship between the United States and China. How has that relationship evolved over the years? What is the current status of the relationship between the U.S. and China? What role does China play in regional politics and more broadly in international politics?Students will write one research paper. The paper must be typed and double-spaced, with Times New Roman 12 font (four to six pages/1,000 to 1,500 words) in MS Word and/or PDF. Papers must be in Chicago style format (author-date) and contain at least five peer-reviewed academic sources.

Judicial Branch Assignment Federalist 78 is part of the Federalist Paper series written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay and James Madison in defense of the US Constitution as written by the Constitutional Convention held in 1787 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. In essence, it is a persuasive essay used to convince states to ratify the Constitution. Federalist 78 specifically addresses the creation of the federal judicial branch. In particular, it describes the means of selecting judges and how long judges should remain in office.  Formatting: Double spaced, 12 Point Times New Roman Font, 1 inch margins,  2 full pages (¾ will not count), no title, name in header (no other information should be included at top of page). You may write up to 2 pages for this assignment but no more than 2 pages.  You must read Chapter 15 in your textbook and Federalist 78 to complete this assignment. Your task is to use the concepts in your book to complete this assignment. Do not use any outside sources. Only use your textbook and Federalist #78.  No direct quotes from Federalist 78 or other sources are permitted.  Fully answer all questions in essay form, using complete sentences, no numbering/bullet points. Do not repeat the questions. Use correct grammar and spelling at all times.  Questions: For what reasons does Hamilton state that the judicial branch is the “least dangerous” branch of government? What are the possible effects on the judicial branch of being the “least dangerous” branch? Hamilton states that the judicial branch must be independent. From what, or whom, does the branch need to be independent? What is the main purpose of a judicial branch according to Hamilton? What type of judicial selection and term of office does Hamilton support? What types of judicial selection does he not support? Why? According to Hamilton, what are the qualifications and characteristics that judges must possess in order to do their job? Further, what type of judicial selection method does Hamilton think will produce these characteristics?