philosophy

One Inch Margins. Bibliography with AT LEAST 5 sources on separate page at the end. Please state the subject of your paper clearly. A potential title will be appreciated. SUBJECT: The Ethical Implications of Human Cloning. Academic and reliable sources for your bibliography could be found: Online at https://scholar.google.com/ Look particularly for sites with .edu or .org More importantly, it is strongly recommended to use the service of SDSU library: The instructions are in: https://library.sdsu.edu/research-services/research-help/finding-articles https://library.sdsu.edu/research-services/news/quick-guide-search-articles

for the questions its about the readings on the 2 passages. using also class rooms discussions. each question has to be one page. -Solomon and Plato- 1• How does one attract commitment according to the Song of Songs. 2• Contrast the three speeches with Diotema’s speech in Plato for the third page 3rd page -students will be asked to hand in an essay where they grapple with a relationship crisis in the light of one or more of the texts studied. -Narrate the crisis • Resolve it with one or both of the texts studied in class love crisis reference to what we studied

Compare the most important features of your personal worldview to the worldview you found in the first section. Then explain whether this class has changed any part of your worldview, and if so how. Finally, assess the possible impact that this semester’s study has had on you personally, whether positive, negative, or no impact. Your paper must have at least 3 quotations from the Bible.  Do not insert any quote  longer than 6 lines, and no paper should have more than 10% of it in quotations.  If a quote is  important enough to insert in your paper, then it is important enough for you to spend some  time analyzing.  First, insert the quote, and then tell me what is important about the quote.   Analyze the quote.

Argument Paper Instruction GuideThe Argument Paper is different in important ways from the Close Reading Paper. Whereas the Close Reading is a textual interpretation assignment, the Argument Paper is an analysis argument, particularly, an analysis of an argument you find in the text.Step 0: Select you argument from one of the texts we have read or will read in class this semester. Refer back to the Close Reading Guide for tips on text selection and prewriting techniques. I really cannot emphasize the importance of prewriting enough. Just do it!Step 1: Put the argument you selected in standard form. This should be the first part of your paper. You know how to do this: no explanation necessary, just number the premises and conclusion and capture the essential structure of the argument.Step 2: This is the analysis part of the paper and probably the bulk of the writing and thinking. In this section of the paper you are going to explain how the argument works by breaking it up into its parts and walking the reader through each step of the process. Imagine you are explaining the argument to a little brother or sister or friend. What needs to be said and what can safely be left out? How does one premise lead into another? Where do the premises come from and in general, what are their justifications? Follow the inferential thread for the reader all the way to the conclusion.Step 3: This is the synthetic or critical part of the paper. Take a step back from what you’ve done previously and take it in. Pull the disparate pieces together and say something about the whole. Is this a good argument? Why or why not? Use the resources you’ve gained through the semester to talk about the argument. Is it deductive or inductive? If it is deductive, is it valid and sound? What kind of deductive inference is it or what multiple kinds of deductive inference does it involve? If it is inductive is it strong and cogent. What type of inductive inference/s does it involve? Finally, talk a bit about the context of the argument. Why is it occurring in the text in the place it is and what work is it doing? Does it successfully accomplish that work? Why is this argument important?

It’s an argumentative essay. Lying is a hot topic in morality, for we are not suppose to lie, but are there not times we actually should lie? In the PowerPoint you read three weeks ago, I had a slide with the different types of lying; in that slide I had the contention that belief without proof is actually worse than lying, because someone who believes without proof is saying truth has no value. Read “BY THE WATERS OF BABYLON” by Stephen Vincent Benét – see attachment. A good source: http://www.tkinter.smig.net/Outings/RosemountGhosts/Babylon.htm (Links to an external site.) Instructions: MLA style, type, size-12 Times New Roman, double-space. Answer the following question using chunk style. Use no more than 1500 words ASSIGNMENT: Should TRUTH be given out in small doses, or should the truth, facts, be wholly available to each and every person? For how is it we actually do come upon the truth of things? You must use at least: 1) two quotes from Benet, and 2) should have at least two quotes from an additional source.

In a 3-4 page essay, explain the reasons for the dominance of England in the formation of colonies in North America. Include discussions of the similarities and differences between the New England, Middle, and Southern (including Chesapeake) colonies.

Scenario: (Don’t answer the questions in this scenario yet, these are for you to consider only, answer questions 1-5 below the scenario) Imagine time were somehow to start back over again from when our first ancestors walked the earth (and nobody was aware time had re-started, nor had any memory of it) would history literally repeat itself the exact same way? Or would things change? Would something like World War II still happen? And with all the same people involved (Hitler, Mussolini, and Hirohito, the Nazis, the Axis powers, the Allied powers, etc.)? What about on a much smaller scale? Would you end up taking this particular class at this particular university with all the same classmates you currently have, me as teacher, with your same schedule of classes for this semester, etc? After you’ve given it some thought, answer the questions below: 1-2 Choose two of these three theories Soft determinist, Hard Determinist, or Libertarian, and then answer the following questions for BOTH of those theories you chose: (Conclusion/Application) According to this theory, would history repeat itself in the exact same way (or in a similar way)? On a small scale, on a large scale? Why? In your own words, explain why a person holding this theory would argue this. 3. (Opinion) What was the most confusing part about this chapter or lesson? 4. (Opinion) What do you believe would happen in the scenario above? Would time repeat itself exactly the same? Or would it change? Why? Do you agree with any of the theories discussed?

I need a writing sample for Masters program admission in philosophy. It can be any topic, preferably a topic in political or social philosophy. The admission process is very competitive, so I really need your help in preparing a strong argumentative paper.

In this comparison/contrast essay, choose one of the following questions to answer. Place one of the bold titles at the top of your essay. The prompts under each question are intended to guide your response. Anselm & Aquinas on God: Compare and contrast the method and approach taken by Anselm & Aquinas to rationally prove the existence of God. In your reply consider some of the following; What is the difference between an Ontological and Cosmological approach? How is an a priori form of reasoning different from an a posteriori form of reasoning? Aquinas’ argument relies upon reasons and evidence? What is the evidence? Anselm proves his point from reason alone. What are his reasons? What are some of the rational assumptions that Aquinas relies upon. For example; Is it reasonably compelling to reject an infinite regress? Explain. How does the difference between contingency and necessity impact these arguments? Is relying upon reason alone a sufficient condition to prove something exist? Explain. The assignment is to be 2-3 pages in length (approx. 1300 words or 125 lines) using standard 12″ font size with 1.5 spacing. You may use bullet lists sparingly for only part of your essay. Any late assignments will receive partial credit and must be turned in before advancing to the next week.

What is the doctrine of the double effect?  Why does Foot think that the doctrine should be taken seriously?  How does this resonate with your view of abortion? Essays are to be 5 pages in length or roughly 1500 words.  Standard rules of grammar, usage, and organization apply. Requirements are: – 5 to 6 pages – 1,500 words – Correct grammar usage and organization – Correct in-text citations of where you got your information – Works cited page – Paper should be mostly your opinion  – Do NOT use more than 2 resources – Paper tone should be your point of view on what you have found – Describe the issue and explain your stands on the issue – Make sure to answer the questions stated above in you paper as well