Medicine and Health

(Book provided) From page 121 of The Process of Research Writing: “Based on the most current and most recently revised version of your working thesis, write a brief essay where you identify, explain, and answer the antithesis to your position. Keep in mind that the main goal of this essay is to think about an audience of readers who might not agree with you and to answer at least some of the questions and complaints they might have about your research project. Be sure to include evidence about both the antithesis and your working thesis, and be sure to answer the objections hostile readers might have.” Note that you DO NOT have to simply argue against your own true position. Instead, you are attempting to summarize and begin to answer the concerns that might be raised by people who see this debate differently than you do.

Please Rewiew The diversity of Therapeutic Recreation: Application of TR in the Corporate world of Business Article and critique it. This paper should be written as if I were writing it. The paper should not exceed 1000 words. Times New Roman, 12 Point Font, APA format (including referencing etc). I have attached a copy of the article and the assignment criteria as well as a reference for you…. 1. Introduction (introduce keys to your review, why you wrote on this subject, general feeling of research in the stream of leadership education) key points to add here are my major which is Therapeutic Recretaion; so this is why I chose the article that I have so please elaborate on this information in the paper. I also have a stepdaughter with a diagnoses of CASK that you may include in this paper along with a brief explanation of her diagnoses. Please follow all the guidelines presented below ( again as I were to write it) • define your topic and provide an appropriate context for reviewing the literature; • establish your reasons – i.e. point of view – for reviewing the literature; • explain the organisation – i.e. sequence – of the review; state the scope of the review – i.e. what is included and what isn’t included. For example, if you were reviewing the literature on obesity in children you might say something like: There are a large number of studies of obesity trends in the general population. However, since the focus of this research is on obesity in children, these will not be reviewed in detail and will only be referred to as appropriate. 2. Review of Paper (strengths of paper vs weaknesses, Why?); use direct quotes to support key findings, this is the main part of your paper and should be reflected in the length and content of this paper • organise the literature according to common themes; • provide insight into the relation between your chosen topic and the wider subject area e.g. between obesity in children and obesity in general; • move from a general, wider view of the literature being reviewed to the specific focus of your research. 3. Connection to your leadership philosophy and why this type of research is important for development of leaders. You could also introduce and connect ideas from the text book and class here. 4. Conclusion, discussion and future suggestions • summarize the important aspects of the existing body of literature; • evaluate the current state of the literature reviewed; • identify significant flaws or gaps in existing knowledge; • outline areas for future study;

74-year-old male with a history of hypertension and smoking, is having dinner with his wife when he develops sudden onset of difficulty speaking, with drooling from the left side of his mouth, and weakness in his left hand. His wife asks him if he is all right and the patient denies any difficulty. His symptoms progress over the next 10 minutes until he cannot lift his arm and has trouble standing. The patient continues to deny any problems. The wife sits the man in a chair and calls 911. The EMS squad arrives within 5 minutes. Upon arrival in the ED, patient‘s blood pressure was 178/94, pulse 78 and regular, PaO2 97% on room air. Neuro exam – Cranial nerves- Mild left facial droop. Motor- Right arm and leg extremity with 5/5 strength. Left arm cannot resist gravity, left leg with mild drift. Sensation intact. Neglect- Mild neglect to left side of body. Language- Expressive and receptive language intact. In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following: Both the neurological and musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes that would account for the patient presenting these symptoms. Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning. How these processes interact to affect the patient.

This is an analysis of two studies-one quantitative, one qualitative in the subject of medical cannabis. A list of articles provided to save time with research. INTRODUCTION There are many sources of information available on the web and in journals relating to the nursing discipline. Therefore, it is of pivotal importance to understand the basic tenets of critical appraisal of research for its use in interprofessional healthcare practices. The aim of evidence-based practice (EBP) is to employ a three-pronged approach, blending the best available research evidence, patient values and preferences, and clinical expertise. In this task, you will critique two primary research evidence sources. You will select one quantitative and one qualitative peer-reviewed journal article on a healthcare topic of interest. REQUIREMENTS Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide. You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course. Note: Research evidence must not be more than five years old. Note: Upload a copy of the full text of the articles with your submission. Note: You may use the same topic and research articles on both Task 1: Analyzing Research Articles and Task 2: Evidence-Based Practice Change. A. Evaluate a primary, quantitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following: Note: You may select an article focusing on a healthcare topic of your choice or an article focusing on one of the following topics: falls and fall prevention, pain management in children, opioid abuse, hepatitis C, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, or hand hygiene and infections in hospitals. 1. Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the selected journal article: background or introduction (e.g., the purpose of the study) review of the literature (e.g., research used to support the study) data analysis (e.g., how the researcher analyzed the data) methodology (e.g., research type and sampling methods) 2. Evaluate whether the evidence presented in each of the four areas of the journal article from part A1 supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research. 3. Explain how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher, using specific information from the journal article from part A. 4. Describe one strength and one limitation of the study. 5. Describe how the evidence from the article in part A informs current nursing practices. B. Evaluate a primary, qualitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following: Note: You may select an article focusing on a healthcare topic of your choice or an article focusing on one of the following topics: falls and fall prevention, pain management in children, opioid abuse, hepatitis C, catheter associated urinary tract infections, or hand hygiene and infections in hospitals. You may use the same topic that was used in part A. 1. Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the selected journal article: background or introduction (e.g., the purpose of the study) review of the literature (e.g., research used to support the study) data analysis (e.g., how the researcher analyzed the data) methodology (e.g., research type and sampling methods) 2. Evaluate whether the evidence presented in each of the four areas of the journal article from part B1 supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research. 3. Explain how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher, using specific information from the journal article from part B. 4. Identify one strength and one limitation of the study. 5. Describe how the evidence from the article in part B informs current nursing practices. C. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. D. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission. File Restrictions File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( ) File size limit: 200 MB File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z

“Write for a Cause” Argument Essay Information To-Do Date: Jul 8 at 8:00am Objective: Students will connect the various modules in the course to the objective of the final exam. Objective: Students will use the elements of persuasion to support their topic. Objective: Students will connect research methods to write an argument essay. Connecting What You’ve Learned This Semester This semester we started our journey by learning about ourselves through the MyPlan assessment and going through the self-reflective process of finding a “cause” we could connect to your personal or professional growth. As we learned more about ourselves and our natural abilities, we were able to think more earnestly about what we want to see changed or improved in the world. This led us to our “Write for a Cause” research topic and our journey to this point commenced from there. Here’s an overview of what you’ve learned that is applicable to your final exam. For the final exam you will: Use the sources you discovered and summarized in the Preliminary Bibliography and Annotated Bibliography. Use the power of persuasion as you did in the Research Proposal essay. Create claims for topic sentences, offer evidence and write warrants for the information in your body paragraphs as you did in the Short Answer Response module. Use the same essay format as the Analytical Essay where you: (1) create an engaging introduction that leads to a strong thesis (2) offer research responsibly in well-developed body paragraphs (3) write a strong conclusion using the reflect and project method where you leave a lasting impression on your audience. FINAL EXAM ARGUMENT ESSAY (10%) The argument essay should be over the “Write for a Cause” topic that you posed in the preliminary research assignment. For the final exam essay, you will write an argument essay on your topic using factual information gathered from your research. Your intent is to persuade, so you will use the subjective tone. For the final exam, you should: Take a stance on your topic and argue for your cause. This essay should be persuasive, and it should offer factual evidence and warrants to support the claims made in your essay. You may include personal anecdotes to support your ideas as well. If you choose to use anecdotes to support your claims, they should be contextualized and supported by research. Research should go either before or after each anecdote. Please Note: The ONLY difference between the analytical essay and the final exam essay is that your intent is to persuade me and any other audience you imagine to support your “Write for a Cause” topic. The analytical essay and the argument essay are NOT the same essays. They should have two separate thesis statements and offer different forms of evidence. You will use the same strategies for writing the introduction, body, and conclusion paragraphs as was used in the analytical essay. Please see the information in Module 6 and review the webinars for help with strategies for developing your paragraphs. My Annotated Bibliography, Akobirshoev, Ilhom, et al. “Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Birth Outcomes and Labor and Delivery Charges Among Massachusetts Women With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.” Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, vol. 58, no. 2, Apr. 2020, pp. 126–138. EBSCOhost,http://library.collin.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=143267043&site=ehost-live. Access 15 June 2020. Butler, Kiera. “Pregnant While Black.” Mother Jones, vol. 43, no. 4, July 2018, pp. 13–15. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=130112828&site=ehost-live. http://library.collin.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=130112828&site=ehost-live. Access 15 June 2020 Mogos, Mulubrhan F., et al. “Inpatient Maternal Mortality in the United States, 2002–2014.” Nursing Research, vol. 69, no. 1, Jan. 2020, pp. 42–50. EBSCOhost, http://library.collin.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=140878866&site=ehost-live (Links to an external site.). Access 17 June 2020 Petersen, Emily E., et al. “Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Pregnancy-Related Deaths – United States, 2007-2016.” MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 68, no. 35, Sept. 2019, pp. 762–765. EBSCOhost, http://library.collin.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=138475199&site=ehost-live (Links to an external site.). Access 17 June 2020 Pan, Zhi, et al. “Perinatal Health Outcomes Following a Community Health Worker–Supported Home-Visiting Program in Rochester, New York, 2015–2018.” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 110, no. 7, July 2020, pp. 1031–1033. EBSCOhost,http://library.collin.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=143704269&site=ehost-live. Access 17 June 2020

Osteoporosis is a bone disease marked by brittle and fragile bones. In this assignment, you will explore this disease in more detail using the scenario below. Scenario: During a recent visit with a female relative, the relative informs you that she has been diagnosed with osteopenia, a precursor to osteoporosis. In order to help your relative, you decide to research this disease further. To complete this assignment, do the following: Research this disease using a minimum of 2 sources. You can use your textbook for one of the sources. Choose the remaining source(s) from the GALE Virtual Reference Library provided on the Structure and Function of the Human Body library guide page. In a minimum of 2 pages (not counting the references page), address the following: Explain how osteoporosis develops and the potential causes. Describe the ways that your relative can prevent the onset of osteoporosis. Include a references page at the end of your document, formatted using the APA guidelines, that lists your research sources.

Research Paper/Project Information: The goal is to research a disorder and write a 3-5 page research using APA format • General format: APA documentation style • The narrative portion of the paper is a minimum of three complete pages and a maximum of five pages. o Pages are counted excluding graphics or long quotes. • Paper is submitted following the instructor’s directions • All verbatim quotes of 3 words or more must be set apart from your own words with quote marks or a block quote. • All paraphrased statements are cited. Paper: APA format • General o 12-point Times New Roman or Calibri font used throughout o Entire paper is double spaced o Margins are 1″ on all sides o Title Page formatted correctly • Body o Narrative begins on page 2. o Narrative is a minimum of 3 FULL pages and a maximum of 5 pages. o Pages are counted excluding graphics or long quotes. o Running header (left aligned, all caps) and page number (right o aligned) on every page including reference pages • In-text Citations o All reference sources and citations match. o Proper APA style o Citation is correctly incorporated into the sentence it supports o Page or paragraph number included for direct quotes and blockquotes used for 40+ word verbatim quotes (double spaced, indent all lines ½ inch, no quote marks, cite at end) • References Page o Page is titled References and appears at the end of the paper o References appear alphabetically o Hanging indents and double spacing used • Reference List o Minimum of 4 (four) sources: journal articles, books, reputable websites (CDC, NIH, Medline, etc.) o References are cited in the correct APA format for the type of citation they represent (newspaper, book, journal, webpage, etc.)

 We are facing a unique collective experience, the pandemic created by COVID-19. This is an experience that will stay in our minds forever. Although the virus is spreading rapidly, there is little we know about its nature. We are trying to be informed, but the type of information we receive is so overwhelming that at times is hard to separate facts from half trues and lies regarding COVID-19. This assignment aims to search information related to Coronavirus from a biological and social perspective. The final paper must include 3 pages based on the current knowledge we have about Coronavirus. The paper should be written as a word document, double spaced, font size 12, and 1 inch margins. The body of the paper should present the content in a logical sequence, starting with the biological aspects of the virus, then the effects on health, concluding with its impacts in our society. Guide your work using the following prompts to breakdown the contents: 1. Introduction: What is a Coronavirus? Find information about the biology of the virus. Include a description of its structure. 2. Life cycle of the virus: How does coronavirus spread? What happens when a person is infected? How does the virus effect the cells of the individual? 3. Symptomatology: What are the effects of the virus in the human body? How long is the incubation period? 4. Treatment: Is there a cure? What is the current status of research in this virus? Which institutions/laboratories are working on finding a vaccine? 5. Conclusions: With all the knowledge you have, what should you and your community do to face COVID-19 pandemic? If you wish, you can share first hand experiences, although this is not required. 6. List of references: Consult at least 02 scientific articles and 02 popular media sources. List the articles using APA format: Author, date of publication, title of article, organization or publisher. If information is obtained from online sources, include the URL and the retrieval date.

Statement of Purpose. l have an interest in applying to the School of Public Health University in the US for a Master’s degree program in Public Health with a major in biostatistics.

1-What is Celiac Disease defined : sings, Causes, Symptoms, Treatments.
2-Celiac disease vs non celiac gluten sesnsitivity vs Wheat Allergy (explain in a comparison table such as diagnosis symptoms serious condition ).
3-Type 1 diabetes and celiac disease
4-How to differentiate betwwen crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and celiac disease.
5-Celiac disease Pathogenesis. Explain add some picture with explain antibodies affect positive negative result support with study And how used for diagnosis.
6-Foods contain gluten, free gluten, gluten Hidden and gluten contains non-food gluten.
I have attached an articles, please summarize it and add update articles and books for instant, Manual of Pediatric Nutrition 5th ed., Pediatric Nutrition Handbook 7th ed., and Understanding Normal and Clinical Nutriton 12th ed.