Literature

Students will spend a majority of their time working on assignments and college papers during their academic pursuits. These assignments are a must as part of their higher education and contribute directly to their overall grades. However, lately, the education system is going through a transition, and so is the job market. With the rise in innovations every day in the 21st century, the learning model changes, and the changing workforce has rendered traditional teaching methodologies obsolete. As such, theories have started to arise that one’s college paper works may not be relevant in the modern world.Today’s students have a lot on their plate. Most of them have a life outside of their academic pursuits, and some even start small businesses of their own while in college itself. Most of them seek writing services such as WriteMyPaper4me to complete their assignments within the deadline. But not all services are legit, and some are scams posing as writing companies waiting to fraud customers. It may be best to check out WriteMyPaper4me reviews first to check whether it is the right facility for you. There are many factors to consider before settling on a writing company, such as prices, guarantees, and a number of free revisions. It is best for customers to apply due diligence and do their research before settling on a company.Over the last few years, several studies have been conducted on academics and their relevance in the modern world. Some studies show that the academic institutions’ methodologies have not evolved to keep up with every other industry’s changes. This puts how scholars maintain relevance in modern society at stake.Social media over academiaSocial media is one of the most significant factors in every industry and is impacting every other individual. One’s academic pursuit is not further from it. Individuals now have access to stories, news, and information at the tip of their fingers. For college papers to remain relevant, scholars must learn to include the new realities of the information age in their assignments.Most scientific researches and findings are published in journals or blogs. However, not all individuals have access to such online academic journals. This means that new discoveries are often buried deep in the vast ocean of information and is likely lost to the general public. For more people to read up on the academic findings, it may be best for educational institutions to make themselves more accessible with social media. A few pseudo-scientific journals cater to the general public and offer insights into the academic world. This may be the driving factor towards change. Having training programs that help academicians present their papers to the mass may be a good idea.Generational shiftMost educational institutes encourage critical thinking and problem-solving skills and teach their scholars to apply such skills to their papers. Many young people have joined the academic world with different goals and aspirations, unlike their seniors. Students choose a research career to make a significant contribution to the real world and offer their expertise and knowledge to make a difference in the world we live in.However, these scholars report that if academia doesn’t value their engagement, they might change career paths altogether. The threat of irrelevance is, however, quite large among these academic findings of young scholars. The Economist reported in 2010 that most American universities could be unable to see the changes around them and fail to react.Not all is lost, however. Recent research by AAAS survey found that academicians now believe that their work should get more coverage in the new media. Most schools and colleges have understood the value of digital activities in academic achievement and learning the rules of engagement to cater to many more people. By reaching out to more readers, scholars may be given the opportunity to work on papers relevant to modern society.

Visual analysis (300-375 words) that compares and contrasts two photographs of your choice and fully addresses the prompt.Prompt:Pick one photograph by Seydou Keïta from this website: http://www.seydoukeitaphotographer.com/en/photographs/ (Links to an external site.).Next, pick one photograph by Malick Sidibé from this website: https://amp.matrix.msu.edu/portfolio.php?name=MalickSidibé&page=1&page=1 (Links to an external site.).On a separate page in your response, be sure to copy and paste your chosen photographs. Provide the name of the photographer, title (Untitled is okay if no title is provided), date, and link to the website for each photograph (example below). This does NOT go towards the word count.Using only the provided websites, compare and contrast the photographs in terms ofWho is being depicted?What are they wearing?ColorComposition (arrangement of people, props, objects) and poses of the bodyContext (consider: Do these photographs reflect the photographic practices of Seydou Keïta and Malick Sidibé, as described in the video lecture? How so?)What message(s) might the people in the photographs communicate to their viewers?

Your group assignment is to review the case from ColorTech Greenhouses Inc, identify and make recommendations on how the Sales Manager (Melissa Richardson) could address the issues described in the case so that sales performance is increased, and the motivation of each team member is likely to improve.As part of your analysis you are expected to apply 1-2 theories of motivation. Please note, the theories we covered in class may not be the most relevant in this case. If this is the case, you should research for and apply other theories, e.g. the Expectancy theory.Your paper should include:1. An overview of the main issues from the case that needs to be addressed.2. A theoretical explanation of 1-2 motivation theories you are applying in your case.3. Analyze and make suggestions on how you would handle the situation of each employee. You should analyze and make your recommendations primarily from a motivation point of view. Make sure to apply the theories in your analysis!4. Analyze and make recommendations on what did Richardson did right when she started her new job? What mistakes did she make? What might have helped Richardson get off to a better start?5. Finally, what are your recommendations on what Richardson should do next to improve the overall situation at ColorTech?Paper:Write a short paper, 1200-2000 words. Use a normal, 12 pt. font, double spaced, normal margins. It should have a title page with the name of the case, your name, the class name, date, and word count. Include a reference page at the end of the paper and cite sources in the paper following the Harvard Referencing System guidelines. Use primarily credible academic sources (book chapters from our course textbooks and academic research papers). Be clear throughout the text what you are referring to.Upload a copy (pdf or MS Word) of your paper to Turnitin before the paper is due.

While watching Susan Vogel’s “Future of Mud: A Tale of Houses and Lives in Djenné (2007)”, you were asked to keep the following in mind:Generational and gender tensionsPerspectives on masonry and the materials used in constructionThe presentation of exterior and interior spacesPerspectives about the city of DjennéPerspectives on the role of IslamThe influence of tourism and issues of heritageThe filmic techniques and strategies used to shape the narrative of the filmAfter watching the film, write a response (minimum 250 words; maximum 350 words) that fully addresses the prompt below.Prompt: For your response to the discussion question, pick 2-3 topics (e.g. “Generational and gender tensions,” etc.) listed above. In your response, discuss:Your initial reactions and/or thoughts to the filmHow does the film address, illustrate, or make use of these 2-3 topics?Be sure to discuss at least 1 example from the film for each of these topicsConsider: How are your chosen examplesrelevant to your selected topics?Who do you think is the primary audience for this film? Why?Optional: any questions that came up for you while watching this film

Chinese Socialism Past and PresentChinese Culture Traditional and ModernThe paper should be at least 6-7 pages in length, double-spaced, coherently written, with 1-inch margins on all sides. The preferred font is Times New Roman 12.Discuss and compare the major themes, prominent subject matter, and distinctive styles of the films of these directors.A Touch of Sin (Director Jia Zhangke 2013). KanopyMr. Six (Director Guan Hu, starring Feng Xiaogang, 2015). KanopyYouth (Director Feng Xiaogang, 2017). KanopyAvoid simple generalization. You need to refer to specific elements in the films. Your writing should reflect the level and ability of an upper-division college student. Coherence, organization, and elegance are important criteria for good writing.If you anticipate difficulty in writing this paper, try to make an appointment with the University’s Writing Center to get some help as soon as possible.

I’m curious what you think of the character “Injun” Joe in Tom Sawyer. Twain based the character on a real person he had known growing up in Hannibal, Missouri, Joe Douglas. The real Joe was an Osage Indian and was not at all “murderous,” as depicted in the book. Indeed, he objected to Twain about the characterization, as have later members of the Osage Nation, including the poet Carter Revard, whose native name Nom-peh-wah-the means “fear-inspiring.” He finds the characterization deeply offensive, including the word associated with Joe, “Injun.” I think what bothers Nom-peh-wah-the even more is the idea that no one seems bothered by this. The title he gave an article on the subject clearly suggests this: “Why Mark Twain Killed Injun Joe, and Why Nobody Cares.”At the same time, it seems to me that Tom’s reaction when he sees the dead Joe in the cave is very important. It suggests some level of empathy on Tom’s part, and presumably on Twain’s.So . . . what do you think of the characterization of Joe throughout, and does the way Tom reacts to his death suggest any positive view of Joe, either in terms of other characters or on Twain’s part. To put it another way, does anyone care that Joe died the way he did?

Begin by stating a tentative thesis (what you think your paper might argue). Then use the MEAL plan paragraph structure to write one rough draft paragraph that could support this potential thesis in your research essay. The evidence from the Evidence section of your paragraph should come from the source you located on your topic.My research topic is : How has the COVID 19 pandemic affected people’s mental health and substance abuse.

Analyze the way one of the plays we have read is structured by making reference to the following terms: point of attack, inciting incident, climax, and structure. The plays PDF in below.Papers are to be 5 pages long, double-spaced, with a clear introductory paragraph stating your thesis (argument) as well as the main supporting points. In your paper, you should: italicize the titles of plays and provide page number references for all quotes and specific textual references.

Write an analytical report that demonstrates an integrated understanding of the principles of Macroeconomics related to the country you were assigned. You should choose at least 8 of the following areas of Macroeconomics to incorporate in your report.1GDP2Consumption3Disposable income / saving4Monetary policies (interest rates)5Fiscal policies (taxes)6Supply side policies (productivity)7Trade (net exports)8Unemployment9Inflation10Government debt (expenditures)11Country’s economic position

How would you write a mock-apotheosis/deification today? Which powerful figure would be its subject? Who do you imagine might be its author? What are some concrete physical–, character-, or other traits the satirist might mock or belittle, and how or why might he choose these? What might make these funny (and true)? What political, policy, ideological, or other ideas, beliefs, and practices of the satirized might the satirist identify and satirize? And what might the political, ideological, entertainment, or other potential purposes of such a satire be? Make sure to justify yourself: explain why you’ve made the choices that you have, and esp. how they relate to Seneca.Directions:This should be 2 pages, double spaced, 1 inch margins, 12 size font.As always, you will be evaluated on the quality of your writing. You will also be evaluated on your understanding of the principles behind this exercise, in this case, how satire functions. So your assignment must show an awareness of the purposes and strategies that satirists adopt in order to achieve their stated (or unstated goal. You may consider how and why satire mocks, belittles, but also creates community; how it might combine high and low registers and content, and how it is used as a tool to make broader political and cultural observations and statements.