Legal Issues

All citations should be Blue Book citations In the previous week, you conducted legal research for Peggy Peridot’s possible employment discrimination case. For this week’s assignment, you will use the results of that research to draft a legal memorandum for your supervising attorney, Lana Lapis. You wrote a short legal memo for Week 4. This memo involves a more substantial issue to analyze and should follow the general legal memorandum format. Your memo should include the following sections: heading (who it is to and from, as well as a subject line identifying the client), question presented, brief answer, facts, discussion/analysis, and conclusion. It will take careful thought to consider how to appropriately organize the information for your discussion/analysis section. This memo will be a first draft of the Signature Assignment; please note that you will receive a separate grade for this draft. Be sure to use proper legal citation format, as well as ensure that your citations are still “good law.” Length: 5-6 pages References: Include a minimum of five legal resources, using at least one (1) secondary source, and four (4) primary sources. Your proposal should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts that are presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect graduate-level writing and Bluebook standards. Be sure to adhere to Northcentral University’s Academic Integrity Policy. Upload your document and click the Submit to Dropbox button.

Provide a clear definition of the exclusionary rule. Describe how the exclusionary rule might influence the behavior of police officers, detectives, and prosecutors. Recall the scenario in last week’s discussion. Assume that Chip told police that he stashed the bodies but was only doing what Bob, the owner, told him to do. If he revealed this information under questioning, but without having been given his Miranda rights, how would that impact the case? Do you think it is more important for judges to always enforce the exclusionary rule, or should exceptions be made so that violent criminals are not set free despite being guilty? Explain your reasoning. LAST WEEK: Bob Helmsley is a respected community leader and the owner of the Helmsley Crematorium in Amarillo, Texas, that services Texas, Southern Oklahoma, and the northwest region of New Mexico. He is the former coroner in Potter County, Texas, and his wife Susan is a respected member in the community. Susan is the bookkeeper at the crematorium, but neither she nor Bob have any day-to-day contact with business operations, which is currently run by Chip, a long-time family friend and business partner. An anonymous tip on three separate occasions was reported to the Potter County Sheriff’s Department that skeletal remains were seen on the Helmsley property; however, when investigated by the authorities, nothing ever resulted. One day, an unannounced but routine inspection by the Texas Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers revealed a shed stacked with human bodies and an open grave with bodies scattered about the property. There were so many bodies; a federal disaster team was dispatched to aid the state in identifying the remains. Bob, Susan, and Chip were arrested, and ultimately, the investigators discovered four hundred uncremated bodies.

Beginning with Executive Order (EO) 13873 signed on May 5, 2019, analyze President Trump’s declaration of a national emergency in regards to securing the information and communications technology and services supply chain. Your paper should clearly discuss the EO’s possible impact on the National Security agenda of protecting citizens from foreign national terrorists while evaluating agency implementation, and the role federal, state, local, and tribal governments to support your argument. All requirements of prompt and format must be met to receive full credit. Grades are based on the following: Pros vs cons on the EO; Recommendation to your superior on the implementation; What will be the outcome by the Supreme Court, and why; Four (4) pages; Grammar and compliance to APA (6th) including citations and reference page; Double spaced; and Times New Roman, 12 point font.

The topic this term will be to analyse a contract from a security firm regarding the protection of a person or a business applicable in Ontario. Each student (individual paper) will explain the application of all the legal concepts covered in class to the term paper and propose recommendations regarding the legal issues. You do not go outside the class material covered in class to complete the term paper. Minimum, 35 TO 40 PAGES, DOUBLE SPACED Times Roman, 12 points, Report format USE FOOTNOTES and appropriate references. 1. Executive summary with key recommendations (one-two pages) 2. Introduction (five pages) – explanation of the paper, objectives, ethical issues and methodology – how did you completed the paper steps by steps – including the business relationship with the stakeholders; 3. Description and explanation in your words of all the clauses of the document (fifteen pages to twenty pages); 4. Application of any legal principles (20) covered in class (seven to ten pages) and where these principles are to be found in the agreement; 5. Recommendations (5) and lessons learned (three pages); 6. Application of the agreement with your problem scenario of your choice, legal corrective measures with provisions dealing with all the elements of the document (five to seven pages); 7. Document attached.

Should celebrities who break the law face stricter penalties? You should complete an argumentative essay to prove that celebrities who break the law SHOULD face stricter penalties? You should use academic vocabulary 1. Use scientific!!! language and academic vocabulary 2. No passive voice, no jargon, no personal nouns, no idioms 3.Use 3 scientific sources (two of them should be published between 2015-2020)!! Academic journals and articles. include page numbers Structure: introduction, main body, conclusion! Be specific. You answer should be very academic, argumentative and clear.

Should celebrities who break the law face stricter penalties? You should complete an argumentative essay to prove that celebrities who break the law SHOULD face stricter penalties? You should use academic vocabulary 1. Use scientific!!! language and academic vocabulary 2. No passive voice, no jargon, no personal nouns, no idioms 3.Use 3 scientific sources (two of them should be published between 2015-2020)!! Academic journals and articles. include page numbers Structure: introduction, main body, conclusion! Be specific. You answer should be very academic, argumentative and clear.

Overview Understanding the legal literature in sport provides application of law to the sport environment. As future managers, a better understanding of the law enables professionals to improve the workplace and participation environment, as well as minimize organizational liability. Instructions Select a case from week 1-2 text readings. Write a minimum FOUR page legal critique related to any legal issue in the sport environment. The selected case must be from those listed in the chapter readings to date or another case found that relates to the legal topics in corresponding readings for previous two weeks.  Title page should contain full APA citation Summarize the background or facts of the case In question format, write 2-3 legal issues pertaining to this case Holding (court’s final ruling) Rationale of the court’s decision Significance of case in the sport environment Personal response or critical opinion of court’s ruling and rationale Explain how knowledge of this case might assist you or your organization Notes: You may include pertinent cases to provide evidence of case precedence related to the topic. Follow APA format. Include a cover sheet and reference list (not included in minimum 4 pp). Use the rubric attached below to guide your work. Instructions   From your selected legal case critique I, create a Powerpoint slide presentation of your case brief. Minimum 15 ppt slides. Include a reference slide at the end.   Note: You may also search the Internet for case information related to your selected legal topic or particular case. Remember to cite all your sources in a reference list.

Based upon research of your state of residence or home state compare current training and selection criteria against criteria covered in the ASIS guide. What are the shortcomings and what recommendations would you suggest. Instructions: Fully utilize the materials that have been provided to you in order to support your response. Your initial post should be at least 350 words. Please respond to at least two other students. Responses should be a minimum of 150 words and include direct questions. You may challenge, support or supplement another student’s answer using the terms, concepts and theories from the required readings. Also, do not be afraid to respectfully disagree where you feel appropriate; as this should be part of your analysis process at this academic level. Forum posts are graded on timeliness, relevance, knowledge of the weekly readings, and the quality of original ideas. While proper APA is not required, attribution to sources that informed your posting should be included. Refer to the grading rubric for additional details concerning grading criteria

Please look over the links below and answer questions 1 and 2 under Assignment. https://www.mckesson.com/investors/corporate-governance/compliance-committee-charter/ https://www.aon.com/about-aon/corporate-governance/corporate-governance.jsp Assignment:  *Assume you are the compliance program manager (and sole compliance professional) of a small public company, “DogsTogs” that makes and sells canine attire. The company is growing quickly, and since you seem to have a firm grasp on compliance, your boss, the CFO, would potentially like to promote you to the position of Head of Compliance.  But before the final decision is made on who will run the compliance department, she would like you to propose to her the structure you think the company should have for compliance. She has asked you to draft an email to her and the General Counsel (the lead attorney for DogsTogs) outlining: to whom you think you should report if you are promoted (who your boss will be — the person who gives you an annual performance review) and why, and if you think the company needs an official Compliance Committee.  If you believe it does need such a Committee, who do you think the members should be, and how often should they meet? If you don’t feel the company needs a Compliance Committee, please explain why. Keep to a maximum of 3 paragraphs double spaced.

Capstone Project Term Paper Requirements: The paper will be a minimum of 20 content pages, double-spaced, 12 pt. font using Times-New Roman style with one inch margins (top, bottom, left, and right).  The minimum length for the paper does not include a title page, abstract, exhibits, and reference page, so a minimum of 23 pages is expected.  You must include a title page and a reference page with at least six peer reviewed references from the EU Online Library. An abstract and a running-header are necessary. All works listed on the reference page must be cited in your work and all citations appearing in your work must appear on your reference page in APA format.       Presentation Requirements: Use Microsoft PowerPoint  or other presentation software to prepare a visual presentation of the information contained in your paper. You are encouraged to use photos and graphics in your presentation. A reference page/slide is not required if the references match those used in the paper. A minimum of 12 content slides supporting your paper plus a title page is expected. Audio commentary is not necessary.  Prepare your presentation as if you were presenting to a live audience. A partial reference list is due by Sept 12 and an updated reference list in APA format is due Sept 19 Prepare updated reference list in APA format