The kernel Snatchers

Requirements: -1. For Scenario#1: A fly in the ointment.Briefly describe each mistake and what could have been done to avoid the mistake.2. For Scenario#2: Invasion of the kernel snatchers.Briefly describe each mistake and what could have been done to avoid the mistake.3. For Scenario#3: Silence of the worms .Briefly describe each mistake and what could have been done to avoid the mistake.Requirements:For each scenario, create a two-column table titled with the scenario. In column#1, summarize the mistake; in column#2, describe what can be done to avoid it.4 pages

Read more

Inviting Participants

In this Assignment, you will take the first steps toward putting your interview guide into action. Invite at least five potential participants to participate in your study using the criteria stated in the document, “IRB Requirements for Selecting Participants.” To invite them, you can modify the sample invitation, but use the Informed Consent statement verbatim. These documents are located in the Learning Resources. You can approach friends, family, colleagues, or anyone else as long as they meet the IRB criteria. If you invite five, it is likely that two of them will be able to participate.ASSINGMENTPrepare your participant invitation (refer to the example in this week’s Learning Resources).Select from among your friends, colleagues, and other people you know at least five potential participants, as long as they meet the IRB criteria.Copy and paste the content of your five e-mails to one Word document, and submit this document to the Assignment submission area.Send your invitations to your prospective participants, via e-mail, with a CC to your Instructor.Confirm two participants and send those individuals the IRB Consent Form.

Read more

Police Brutality

The Final Project is a stepwise process, and its goal is to leave you well-prepared by the end of this course to execute on your qualitative research study plan.In Week 7, you will finish Step II of the Final Project; you started this step in Week 6. To complete Step II, do the following:ASSIGNMENTRevise your interview instrumentPrepare a document that includes the following components:A brief description of how you will recruit two participantsA protocol that includes the invitation, informed consent (using the verbatim document from the Walden IRB), interview guide (revised based on feedback from your Instructor and classmates), closing statement, and peer debrief paragraph( Police Brutality against African American Males ) <<<<<

Read more

Conducting Interviews

While this exercise simulates the proposal development for conducting interviews, one way in which this is not a direct simulation is in the selection of participants. For your proposal, your intent will be to invite participants who are most likely to meet your criteria for inclusion. For this course, you are requested to invite people you know (i.e., family and friends) and exclude persons who you do not know and/or are in at-risk populations.The IRB also provides an Informed Consent procedure for conducting your interviews. Use the “IRB Verbatim Informed Consent for Practice Interviews” document in the Learning Resources as an e-mail verbatim.Because this is practice, it may be difficult to find participants who have experienced the phenomenon of interest. You can choose to ask your participants to pretend to have had relevant experience, or perhaps they can respond to the questions considering a similar or relevant personal experience. Remember, the purpose of this exercise is to get you familiar with the process.ASSIGNMENTthis week’s Workshop, visit your unique thread and post a response to the following:Outline your proposed interview procedures, providing justification of each procedure included in your list. Be sure to consider and share your plan for the following:Who you are considering interviewingIncorporation of the exact verbiage provided by the IRB’s Office of Research and ComplianceThe revised interview guide, which now includes the invitation, informed consent, introductory statement, the interview, and a concluding/closing statementIn which format to conduct the interview (e-mail, phone, or in person), with a justification for your choice and inclusion of appropriate sources (referring to articles)Choosing and coordinating a peer debrief with one of your classmates, which can be by phone (preferably) or e-mail and will occur after you have collected your data(please see the previous weeks attached 1-6 DO NOT DUPLICATE)attachment

Read more

Soccer Athletic Association Fund

John Contrito has a heavy conscience. He stole $20,000 from an children’s soccer athletic association fund during the year he served as president of the association. He had never been a religious man, but his guilt was so heavy, he decided to seek spiritual advice. John drives by a strip mall and notices that one of the storefront businesses has a sign that states, “Jacksonville Church of What’s Happening Now.” Burdened with guilt for his transgression, he pulls into the parking lot of the strip mall and enters the establishment. He is met by a woman dressed in clerical garb with a preacher’s collar. She introduces herself as “Lady Divine,” the pastor of the Church. Contrito tells her in a confidential setting in the establishment that his conscience is burdened. Lady Divine asks him to relate his problem to her. He tells her that he stole $20,000 from the soccer associaton. She tells him to leave a donation to her church and to “go and sin no more…. his sin is forgiven.” John Contrito is relieved. Unfortunately for him, the auditor’s report for the soccer association notes the shortfall of $20,000. A police investigation is initiated and John Contrito becomes the prime suspect. During the investigation, the local press account lists John Contrito as the prime suspect. Lady Divine reads the paper and calls the police. She tells them that for a fee, she can give them information that will convict Contrito. The local police pay her a fee of id=mce_marker00 and she tells them that Contrito confessed the crime to her. At trial, Lady Divine is called to the stand by the prosecutor and asked the following question: “Did John Contrito speak to you concerning theft of funds from the soccer association?” The defense counsel for Contrito objects to the questions.What would the specific objection be? Explain your answer.Do you believe that the objection will be sustained by the judge? Why?

Read more

Expert and Nonexpert Witness

Define opinion evidence, expert witness, and nonexpert witness.When an expert gives an opinion regarding handwriting, must the expert state that he or she is positive that the samples are identical? Does requiring a suspect to give a handwriting specimen violate the Fifth Amendment?Define hearsay under the Federal Rules of Evidence. Define the following terms as they are used in relation to the admission of hearsay evidence: statement and declarant. Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, what statements are specifically listed as “statements which are not hearsay?”What reasons are advanced as to why hearsay evidence should not be admitted? What is the rationale for allowing some hearsay evidence to be admitted as exceptions to the hearsay rule?What is a dying declaration? Must a declarant actually state that he or she is aware of imminent death before the statement is admissible? In what types of cases is a dying declaration admissible?Explain the business records exception to the hearsay rule. What is the rationale for the exception?Paragraph for each question

Read more

Legal Aid Society

John Deadbeat is being charged with the crime of intentional failure to pay court-ordered child support for an illegitimate child he had with Ima Mother. Deadbeat goes to the offices of the local legal aid society and seeks the legal advice of an attorney to try to defend him at trial. He is assigned Hector Barrister, a licensed attorney, who talks to him during the interview and tells him about his rights, the defenses, and the trial procedure. During the course of the conversation, Deadbeat tells Barrister that he is concerned about the trial because he is afraid that Mother will testify that Deadbeat had tried to kill her one night about a month ago during an argument, when he aimed a shotgun at her and actually pulled the trigger intending to kill her but the weapon was still on safety and Mother was able to run away at that time. Barrister advises Deadbeat that in light of everything Deadbeat told him, he was going to lose at court. Deadbeat is visibly upset and tells Barrister that he will “finish the job he did not complete” when he tried to kill her in the past, and “this time the safety will be off and the shotgun will be loaded.”Are Deadbeat’s statements about the past attempt to kill Mother privileged under the attorney-client privilege? Please explain your answer.Are Deadbeat’s statements about his intent to kill Mother in the future privileged under the attorney-client privilege? Please explain your answer.

Read more

The Rape Trauma Center

Fact Scenario:Lucille Loos has a sordid past and a very bad reputation for being unchaste. She accused John Smith of raping her on a Federal installation. After her immediate report of the alleged rape, she was taken to the rape trauma center where a medical exam was conducted and vaginal swabs containing semen were taken. There are no witnesses to the alleged rape. The defense attorney for Smith has four witnesses lined up to testify in the case being tried in Federal District court. Witness 1 would testify that he has known Loos all her life and in his opinion she is an unchaste woman. Witness 2 would testify that he has lived in the same small town as Loos and that Loos has a bad reputation for being unchaste in her small town. Witness 3 would testify that he and Loos had “unprotected sex” one hour before the alleged rape. Witness 4 would testify that he heard the accused promise Loos a gift of stock worth $5000 about a month before she reported that he observed Smith and Loos argue over the failure of Smith to complete the gift about a week before she reported that he raped her.Answer the following questions:Would the testimony of Witness 1 be admissible? Explain.Would the testimony of Witness 2 be admissible? Explain.Would the testimony of Witness 3 be admissible? Explain.Would the testimony of Witness 4 be admissible? Explain

Read more

Neurological Pharmacists

Must pick 1 out of the 4 movies listedAPA Format, 12 Font3 page reaction paper to the movie you choose not including cover page or reference page.Requiem for a Dream. Recommended by the College of Psychiatric and Neurological Pharmacists (CPNP) “Junkies”. “Addicts”. “Crack heads”. These are all common derogatory terms referring to people suffering from drug addiction. Requiem for a Dream depicts four different kinds of drug addiction each leading different outcomes for the characters. Sara Goldfarb (Ellen Burstyn) is addicted to amphetamines, Marion Silver (Jennifer Connelly), Tyrone Love (Marlone Wayans), and Harry Goldfarb (Jared Leto) are all addicted to heroin. The lives of these characters are all drastically changed as they progress further into their drug addiction. Requiem for a Dream is not like a typical drug abuse film in which the characters have successfully overcome their addiction or are on a path to recovery. Instead, it shows how drug abuse completely engulfs an individual to the point where they are unrecognizable.OTHER OPTIONSBasketball Diaries: Though basketball is its central conceit, “Basketball Diaries” is not a sports film—at least not in the conventional sense. Based on jock-poet-rock star Jim Carroll’s celebrated account of his brutal descent into heroin abuse as a teenager in Manhattan, the film has no big-game finale drawing the story forward. It’s a tough, intense, wrenching picture about drugs and growing up and surviving, driven by a fierce, skinless performance by its star, Leonardo DiCaprio.Drugstore Cowboy: Portraits of drug addiction tend to wallow in spiraling miseries, like a hurricane that gathers strength and grows more destructive as it reaches landfall. Bob Hughes (Matt Dillon) is the leader of a “family” of drug addicts consisting of his wife, Dianne (Kelly Lynch), and another couple who feed their habit by robbing drug stores as they travel across the country. After a tragedy befalls a member of his group, Bob decides he must leave his dysfunctional clan and go straight. Parting ways with his junkie past proves more difficult than expected when Bob is stalked by an old acquaintance looking to score drugs at any price.Candy: The sight of young people going down the drain is never pleasant, particularly when there are needles jabbed in their arms. It isn’t just that watching anyone probe his or her veins with a sharp tends to be pretty gross; it’s also that the ritual of heroin addiction. This film features striking performances from Heath Ledger and Geoffrey Rush. Mr. Ledger plays Dan, a low-key charmer with a dewily pretty girlfriend, Candy (Abbie Cornish), and a growing appetite for heroin.

Read more

Commercial Law

Define commercial law and illustrate its application using a relevant case study

Read more
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Good News ! We now help with PROCTORED EXAM. Chat with a support agent for more information