Law

Introduction to Your ProjectUsing your model study as a guide, compose and draft an introduction for your project. The introduction must introduce the problem statement that you have identified and the ways in which you intend to examine the problem statement.The introduction should comprise 2–4 paragraphs, including response to the following points:Define the general problem statement that you are investigating. For example, a problem statement can be “Convicted offenders find it difficult to seek gainful employment upon release from prison.”Identify the key issues related to the problem, such as lack of skills among offenders, a desire to return to criminality rather than pursuing lawful employment, or reluctance on the part of employers to hire offenders.Specify the research question(s) you intend to answer with relation to your problem statement. For example, “Does participation in prison-based technical training programs improve an offender’s opportunities for postrelease employment?”Identify potential sources of data.Define the expected outcome of the project—what you expect to find and why.Note: The problem and the key issues should not be explored in detail. Keep in mind that this is simply the first step in presenting your project. You will further work on these ideas in detail in the upcoming weeks. Make sure you incorporate the feedback that you have received for the Week 1 Project. Since the introduction will eventually be included in your final project, ensure that you utilize proper academic writing.

Answer all the following questions:Answer the below questions based on the course material, your own experience and information search on the internetQuestion 1 (34 marks, 400 words)What is gender stereotyping, and how does it result in gender discrimination? Give an example on gender stereotyping that happened in a company or an industry worldwide.Question 2 (33 marks, 400 words)Apprenticeships and training are an excellent way to encourage employees and allow them to learn a wide range of skills in many different fields. With some evidences from articles of the Private Sector Labor Law of Kuwait no.6 of 2010; Write down three advantages and three disadvantages about offering apprenticeship contract for the employee and how does it affect worker efforts and career?Question 3 (33 marks, 400 words)A-The wage is important for every employee, since it provides security and economic well-being. Explain the definitions of Salary, Wage, Remuneration and Compensation? What are the elements of the wage as stated in the Kuwait Employment law?B- What is the employee sick leave rights as stated in the Kuwait Employment law?C- Compensation for vacations and money is one of the tasks of the organization. List three cases in which the worker shall obtain compensation and three cases in which he forfeits his right to compensation.

1,500-2,000 word case study that analyzes the scope, causes, and effectiveness of the juvenile justice system with respect to a particular type of crime commonly committed by juveniles: THEFTIdentify and analyze five different theories, influences, and/or social forces that are common root causes or contributing factors to juveniles committing the type of crime that you’ve chosen. Provide a well-reasoned evaluation of the effectiveness of the juvenile justice system in deterring crime, rehabilitating offenders, and providing relief to the victims of the crime addressed in the case study. Conclude the case study with three recommendations for improving the juvenile justice system.The case study assignment should contain the following sections:IntroductionIdentify a type of crime commonly committed by juveniles and explain why you selected this crime for the assignment. Describe the basic elements of the crime. Explain the scope of juvenile offenders for this type of crime, and identify the impact that this crime has on communities.Root Causes and Contributing FactorsIdentify and analyze five different theories, influences, and/or social forces that are common root causes or contributing factors to juveniles committing the type of crime that you’ve chosen.Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Juvenile Justice SystemEvaluate the effectiveness of the juvenile justice system in deterring crime, rehabilitating offenders, and providing relief to the victims of the juvenile crime addressed in the case study. Discuss recidivism rates of juveniles and factors that contribute to re-offending.Recommendations for ImprovementBased on your research and analysis, make three recommendations for improvement in the juvenile justice system. Explain the basis for your recommendations and support them with research and/or data.Formatting & SourcesPlease write your paper in the APA format. You must use at least four credible, outside sources and cite them using APA format as well. Please include a mix of both primary and secondary sources, with at least one source from a scholarly peer-reviewed journal.

law enforcement agencies select candidates for the job of police officer. During the lecture, I noted that one California police department is considering requiring applicants to be at least 25 years old and have a college degree. We also looked at the different issues that are reviewed for applicants such as criminal history, credit history, social media use, etc. What considerations/restrictions do you think should be added to or deleted from the hiring process? Why are you in favor of making those changes – how will it help the process?

review and analysis with findings must be filtered through the period of unrest -COVID 19, and the deaths of Ahmad Arbery, Breonna Taylor and George Floyd. section 1 is the introduction which you’d summarize your findings in paragraph form.section 11: Evidence- paragraph form•read and analyze the following gang injunction as it pertains to your country of residency; breakdown the relevant component parts of the gang injunction- parties, complaint, means of identification, safety zone, criminal allegations, implemented restrictions. (city of riverside or city of Rancho Cucamonga•what does the US constitution say about criminal law- amendment 1,4,5,6,8, and 14 ?• Preamble; articles 1,2, &3; Amendment 1-10 and 14• is the following riverside press enterprise article significant to the assignment? your reason should be given from a criminal justice perspective not from your own personal perspective. -gang member sentenced for killing boy, 13. (file will be uploaded)• do you such terms as privacy, freedom, searches, attorney representation, evidence collection, foreign nationals, probation and parole matter in the discussion of implemented gang injunction?•is the approach of the ACLU significant to the discussion?section 111: conclusionwhat are your thoughts now about gang injunction consensus or conflict? what suggestions do you have in this matter.

On October 13, 1979, Marilyn R. Schnopps was fatally shot by her estranged husband George A. Schnopps. A jury convicted Schnopps of murder in the first degree, and he was sentenced to the mandatory term of life imprisonment. Schnopps claims that the trial judge erred by refusing to instruct the jury on voluntary manslaughter. We agree. We reverse and order a new trial.We summarize those facts. Schnopps testified that his wife had left him three weeks prior to the slaying. He claims that he first became aware of the problems in his fourteen-year marriage at a point about six months before the slaying. According to the defendant, on that occasion he took his wife to a club to dance, and she spent the evening dancing with a coworker. On arriving home, the defendant and his wife argued over her conduct. She told him that she no longer loved him and that she wanted a divorce. Schnopps became very upset. He admitted that he took out his shotgun during the course of this argument, but he denied that he intended to use it.During the next few months, Schnopps argued frequently with his wife. The defendant accused her of seeing another man, but she steadfastly denied the accusations. On more than one occasion Schnopps threatened his wife with physical harm. He testified he never intended to hurt his wife but only wanted to scare her so that she would end the relationship with her coworker.One day in September, 1979, the defendant became aware that the suspected boyfriend used a “signal” in telephoning Schnopps’ wife. Schnopps used the signal, and his wife answered the phone with “Hi, Lover.” She hung up immediately when she recognized Schnopps’ voice. That afternoon she did not return home. Later that evening, she informed Schnopps by telephone that she had moved to her mother’s house and that she had the children with her. She 180*180 told Schnopps she would not return to their home. Thereafter she “froze [him] out,” and would not talk to him. During this period, the defendant spoke with a lawyer about a divorce and was told that he had a good chance of getting custody of the children, due to his wife’s “desertion and adultery.”On the day of the killing, Schnopps had asked his wife to come to their home and talk over their marital difficulties. Schnopps told his wife that he wanted his children at home, and that he wanted the family to remain intact. Schnopps cried during the conversation, and begged his wife to let the children live with him and to keep their family together. His wife replied, “No, I am going to court, you are going to give me all the furniture, you are going to have to get the Hell out of here, you won’t have nothing.” Then, pointing to her crotch, she said, “You will never touch this again, because I have got something bigger and better for it.”On hearing those words, Schnopps claims that his mind went blank, and that he went “berserk.” He went to a cabinet and got out a pistol he had bought and loaded the day before, and he shot his wife and himself. When he “started coming to” as a result of the pain of his self-inflicted wound, he called his neighbor to come over and asked him to summon help. The victim was pronounced dead at the scene, and the defendant was arrested and taken to the hospital for treatment of his wound.The issue raised by Schnopps’ appeal is whether in these circumstances the judge was required to instruct the jury on voluntary manslaughter. Instructions on voluntary manslaughter must be given if there is evidence of provocation deemed adequate in law to cause the accused to lose his self-control in the heat of passion, and if the killing followed the provocation before sufficient time had elapsed for the accused’s temper to cool.Schnopps argues that “[t]he existence of sufficient provocation is not foreclosed absolutely because a defendant learns of a fact from oral statements rather than from personal observation,” Schnopps asserts that his wife’s statements constituted a “peculiarly immediate and intense offense to a spouse’s sensitivities.” He concedes that the words at issue are indicative of past as well as present adultery. Schnopps claims, however, that his wife’s admission of adultery was made for the first time on the day of the killing, and hence the evidence of provocation was sufficient to trigger jury consideration of voluntary manslaughter as a possible verdict.The Commonwealth quarrels with the defendant’s claim, asserting that the defendant knew of his wife’s infidelity for some months, and hence the killing did not follow immediately upon the provocation. Therefore, the Commonwealth concludes, a manslaughter instruction would have been improper. The flaw in the Commonwealth’s argument is that conflicting testimony and inferences from the evidence are to be resolved by the trier of fact, not the judge.Withdrawal of the issue of voluntary manslaughter in this case denied the jury the opportunity to pass on the defendant’s credibility in the critical aspects of his testimony. The 182*182 portion of Schnopps’ testimony concerning provocation created a factual dispute between Schnopps and the Commonwealth. It was for the jury, not the judge, to resolve the factual issues raised by Schmopps’ claim of provocation.We do not question the propriety of the verdict returned by the jury. However, based on the defendant’s testimony, voluntary manslaughter was a possible verdict. Therefore, it was error to withhold “from the consideration of the jury another verdict which, although they might not have reached it, was nevertheless open to them upon the evidence.”For the reasons stated, the judgment of the Superior Court is reversed, the verdict of murder in the first degree is set aside, and the case remanded for a new trial.Were the wife’s comments so shocking as to be tantamount to the defendant’s actually catching her in an adulterous act with her lover?What are the implications of extending the provocation doctrine in infidelity cases from actually witnessing a spouse committing adultery to learning about it verbally?

please repeat each question and then write your response under it. You must space out your work so it is clear which part of the question you are answering at any point!   CHAPTER ONE There are two main questions in this discussion assignment. Please respond to each of the two questions below with at least 300 words for each of the two discussion questions … of course use more words if you need to do a really great job.  Write the number of words you used at the end of each of your two responses (two numbers only).   This is my suggested TEMPLATE/PARAGRAPHS for your main discussion response for each question as applicable: Title Introduction Main Point (Just make the point … don’t use “main point.”) Main Point (Please make the point … don’t write “main point.”) Main Point (Please make the point … don’t write “main point.”) Conclusions and Policy Implication. I hope this helps. Thanks and good luck. Dr. Alex     Question #1: “Ultimately, we live in a world of two realities …experiential and agreement realities …” Comment critically on this statement and say what exactly you understand by this. Also, please list and explain four major errors in personal human inquiry? LASTLY, WHAT DO YOU UNDERSTAND BY “SCIENTIFIC METHOD”?   Question #2:  List and explain four purposes of criminal justice research.   Also, please discuss how a social scientist would avoid making the errors you discussed in #1 above. LASTLY, BRIEFLY DISTINGUISH BETWEEN SCIENCE AND RELIGION.

You have five questions each question includes from 3 to 7 parts. You need to deliver each question within 4 days answered correctly with an accurate evidence.  Each PART should be answered in ONE page long comprehensive with sources and facts.  You are not allowed to copy any provided documents or the answers you found in the articles or literature you read, and your answers should be precise and legit. *** Please if you are not familiar with this technology and aware of the topic don’t waste my time. ****

Two responses to peers of 500 words each. Each of these posts include correct usage of APA format, your Christian world view, and relevant in-text support for both. Also, include a reference at the conclusion of each response in proper APA format (7th edition). See the discussion board rubric for additional clarification. Each response must support peer posts with addition of new information to develop the research.Submit Discussion Board 1 by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of Module/Week 1. Submit two replies to your colleagues by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 1.Textbook

I will attach the sample so you preserve the outline structure the professor told us that the structure is only important (they told us to not focus too much on the material and citation). You can use the layout if you want or APA for the citation and often use sites like McKinsey or Boston analytics to source or to find useful tables and figures.