Law

American Analysis EssayWrite an essay on the following question:1. How do the ideas in “The Crisis” by Thomas Paine and “Civil Disobedience”by Henry David Thoreau apply to modern America?This essay must include ALL of the following features:A.  IntroductionB.  Thesis (includes a stance- your answer to the question and a reason that it applies to both        documents as to why your stance is trueC.  One Body Paragraph on “The Crisis”D.  One Body Paragraph on “Civil DisobediencE.  Evidence (specific evidence from each document with citations)F.  Conclusion

Read the Challenger/Columbia case on page 374-379. What are your overall thoughts on the case?  What would you have done differently to avoid the end result?  What lessons from this case can you apply to a specific situation either in your work or personal life that can help you lead change more effectively?  Give specific examples to support your thoughts. PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT FOR THE CASE

the essay doesnt really talk about the scenario, i was hoping it wouldThe scenario:Early one morning at work, CEO Alice Johnson asks if you have a moment to chat. I need your expertise andadvice on a complicated situation for the company regarding an international hacking lawsuit. In her office, Aliceexplains that CyberTech is serving as the cyber forensics consultant for a law firm handling the suit from a 2015hack of the Office of Personnel Management, OPM.The OPM hack compromised background information on millions of workers. In a related case Anomalous, anon-US gray hat hackinggroup suspected in the OPM breach case, is claiming that US-based Equation Setattempted to hack its facilities. So we have a non-US and a US set of test hacker groups involved. WithAnomalous, the non-US group, being a client defendant in one case against Equation Set, the US group, and as a suspect in the OPM breach.But Alice then outlines why the case is problematic. Along with the OPM victims, CyberTech represents clientsfrom some of the OPM breach suspect companies in unrelated cases, which could appear to be a conflict of]interest. This could affect the way our company is perceived by others. We need to maintain our image as anunbiased cyber security consultant.Should CyberTech remain on both the OPM breach investigation and the overseas case at the same time?Or should we drop one of the cases? Apply your critical thinking and analytical skills to figure out whathappened what we know and don’t know, and how the company might remedy this situation.——————————————————————————————————————————To help you analyze the situation (you are NOT fixing anything, you are doing a preliminaryassessment), ask yourselves:• What happened/what is the context?• Who are the stakeholders (all parties involved)?• What do we know from the intro by our boss?• What don’t we know (but would need to know)?• What evidence do we have (facts v. inferences)?• What are the legal issues (don’t overlook)?• What are the ethical issues (don’t overlook)?• What are possible conclusions (do we drop a client, both, neither, and why)?• What are our biases (then go back and start again)?• What other issues, if any, may apply?

Find here below the instructions for this research assignment. Also, find attached the first assignment directly linked to this assignment which discusses the bill I’m proposing in the Florida State LegislatureYour task for the first major assignment is to research and report on the fundamental characteristics of the state government and legislature you will be trying to impact with your lobbying issue. This assignment, unlike the next two, is research-heavy, so I am looking for a well-documented variety of sources with a bibliography.The paper has three distinct components that I will be grading on:A. Political CultureAssess and report on the political culture of your state [Florida]. Analyze how political culture, history, demography and social forces have shaped how citizens view politics, what they expect from government, and especially how they have shaped governing institutions. “A” papers will describe how political culture and history have shaped and influenced how politics is practiccommittee ed and how institutions such as the legislature and executive branch utilize power.B. Key Relationship AnalysisPick a key member from the Florida State that will be considering your bill. This should be someone you’ve identified as important to the prospects that you hope to influence, and should not be a dedicated supporter or committed opponent.Analyze what makes them tick. What are the key internal and external relationships that influences their voting behavior? Please make certain that you comment on the variety of external relationships—i.e. interest groups, family, colleagues, governor and so forth. Also, take a look at the member’s district and the type of relationship and memberships they have back home. Look at this committee member biography, quotes, and other key voters in the committee to see how you can leverage them on your side for the purposes of this bill proposal.How can those relationships be leveraged for the purposes of your issue?C. Institutional andParliamentary StructureBased on the lectures and readings about parliamentary procedure and the four “knows” of the legislature, demonstrate you know something about how the legislature is organized. In this section, provide me with a concise backgrounder on what I need to know of the rules and make-up of the Florida state legislature. Pay particular attention to relevant facts that impact your legislation. This should be an informative essay about the committee structure, partisan structure, leadership, and relevant rules that someone unfamiliar with your state would need to know if they start to lobby. Please do not simply cut and paste from the state legislature’s website. Give me practical information.Grading RubricYour papers will be graded based on the following rubric.1.    Lobbying Plan proposal: Submitted, timely and well-prepared lobbying plan proposal. 10 points2.    Answered specified questions: Paper addresses fully all the questions posed in the assignment. 20 points3.    Integration of lecture/reading materials and analysis: Paper addresses and integrates key themes from lecture materials and pulls from these themes to assert well-argued conclusions. 40 points4.    Writing/concise: Paper is well written, avoids grammatical and spelling errors, observes page constraints, and is succinct. 10 points5.    Research: Paper uses a variety of quality and credible sources to argue points effectively. Student conducted an interview. 20 points

Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity: Textbook: Chapters 5 Lesson APA style manual Citation and Writing Assistance: Writing Papers At CU (Links to an external site.) Library Overview (Links to an external site.) How to Search for Articles – the Everything Tab (Links to an external site.) Two additional sources beyond those provided Instructions Research the background of your Congressional representatives based on your address listed with CU – two senators and a member of the House of Representatives. Find out about their previous occupation(s), political experience, family, income, education, and other relevant demographics. What percentage of the vote did they receive to win in their last election? What are two policy issues areas they are interested in? How do these areas reflect their ideologies? Here is a link to get your started: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)  Please choose adres as brooklyn 11222 or queens 11385  Write an essay. Start by identifying all three of your representatives. Then, pick the representative you are most interested in and explain why they interest you. Present the information you found in your research required above in the essay. Writing Requirements (APA format) Length: 4 full pages (not including title page or references page) 1-inch margins Double spaced 12-point Times New Roman font Title page References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources beyond those provided) Citation and Writing Assistance: Writing Papers At CU (Links to an external site.) Library Overview (Links to an external site.) How to Search for Articles – the Everything Tab (Links to an external site.) Grading This activity will be graded using the Assignment #3 Grading Rubric. Week 3 Representative Grading Rubric (125 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identifies and chooses a representative 20.0 pts The student identifies all three representatives and picks one. 16.0 pts The student identifies two representatives and picks one. 12.0 pts The student identifies a representative. 0.0 pts The student did not identify representatives. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Background info on chosen representative – previous occupation(s), political experience, family, income, education, and other relevant demographics 40.0 pts The student identifies at least five relevant pieces of information about the representative. 32.0 pts The student identifies at least four relevant pieces of information about the representative. 16.0 pts The student identifies at least two relevant pieces of information about the representative. 0.0 pts The student does not identify relevant pieces of information about the representative. 40.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identifies correct vote margin 5.0 pts The student provides the correct vote margin. 0.0 pts The student did not provide the correct vote margin. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identifies two policy areas and analyzes how these policy areas reflect ideologies 40.0 pts The student identifies two policy areas and provides analysis of ideology. 32.0 pts The student identifies two policy areas. 20.0 pts The student identifies one policy area. 0.0 pts The student does not identify any policy areas. 40.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA/Sources 10.0 pts The assignment is referenced and formatted according to APA standards and two additional scholarly sources are provided. 8.0 pts The assignment is referenced and formatted according to APA standards and one additional scholarly source is provided. 6.0 pts The assignment is referenced and formatted according to APA standards, but has no additional sources. 0.0 pts No APA style or format was used. No sources used. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing 10.0 pts The student presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). 8.0 pts The student presents information using understandable language, but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). 6.0 pts The student presents information using understandable language but is very disorganized (many errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). 0.0 pts The student presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation). 10.0 pts Total Points: 125.

Find a journal article that discusses the policies regarding surveillance techniques. The article should be dated from 2010-current.   Summarize the article. You are an administrator at a criminal justice agency (law enforcement, corrections, or court). What policies should be implemented to ensure proper surveillance techniques? Be sure to cite and reference other sources for this section to justify your answer.

Writing Assignment   Due Date:       Monday, November 16, 2020 via upload to BlackBoard   Formatting: Font Type:      Times New Roman Font Size:        12 Spacing:          1.5 inches Margins:          1 inch on all sides Instructions: Explore a victimology topic of your choice. You may select from the following list of topics:  Sexual assault : This is the topic you using . Use a minimum of 4 news articles that describe the type of victimization you have selected as your base. Discuss how the primary/direct and secondary victims may be impacted by the victimization Discuss how the media sources you used treated the victim. For example: did the media source focus more on the offender, did the media source alienate or shame the victim, did the media show attention or empathy towards the victim etc. Explain how the media’s portrayal may impact the victim and his/her healing process or road to resilience Discuss how the criminal justice system can positively serve the victims If you were to assemble a victimology research based on the topic and victims you selected: a)what would be that research’s focus be? b)why would that be the focus? c)how would your research benefit the study of victims?

In a minimum 5 page paper, react to the article provided.   Think about: are there problems with the laws surrounding sexual assault and rape, and if so, what are they?   Do experts share your opinion, or have differing views, and why do you think they are right/wrong?    What are the historic underpinnings of these laws that have led to the laws we have today? What would be some valuable changes, if any? Why?    You don’t have to answer any or all of these questions.  This is a reaction paper, so you can take the paper in the direction you believe is appropriate.  But you do need to structure a paper so that your argument relies on some research, and you must quote or paraphrase authorities to advance your argument.  You should cite to at least five authoritative sources.      Five pages means times new Roman, 12 point font, double spacing (not double-double spacing), one inch margins.   You should not need any subheadings for this paper.   You can use a title page if you want, but on a separate sheet that does not count for your five pages.   Five pages means that the writing starts at the top of the margin, and ends at the bottom, and the last page is at least 3/4 completed.   You should include page numbers.    Authoritative sources mean scholars, politicians, think tanks, law review articles, and well-known thinkers.   Usually these will come from well-known magazines, newspapers, or scholarly sources.  Check the background of your sources.   A random person’s anecdotal experience published on Medium is not sufficient.  (You could use someone’s experience to illustrate your points if you want but they will not count towards your five source requirement).  Content aggregators are not scholarly sources.  The article I gave you does not count as a source.   Your paper must be well-organized, coherent, and proof-read.   All work must be your own.   When you cite to a source, you must attribute a direct quotation by marking it with quotation marks and immediately using a citation; or  attribute a paraphrase by immediately using a citation after the paraphrased material.  I do not care about the citation method, but merely putting a works cited list at the end without any end notes/foot notes/parenthetical citations in the body of the paper is not just unacceptable, it is plagiarism.  You may receive a 0 or other sanctions if you plagiarize.   When you quote, you should not use block quotes unless absolutely necessary.   You should try to limit the quotations to the shortest amount of material possible while still providing context.   It is always better to integrate a quotation into a sentence that is partially your own thought, and partially quoted material.    Finally, do not simply put in a quote and expect me to understand why it is there.  That is not good writing.  Your paper must provide enough context  for me to understand why you chose to quote someone else’s words.   Papers must be turned in on time using turn it in.  No late papers will be accepted absent extenuating circumstances.     You have two months to complete this assignment.  Please do not put it off until the last minute.  I will be happy to discuss drafts, or even review drafts, until November 11.    Grading: Five quality sources, used appropriately: 50 points Writing, organizing, arguing, proof reading: 40 points Formatting, length: 10 points

Are there any demerits or benefits of accepting refugees into a country?

The final paper must contain an abstract, 10-12 full pages of content, double-spaced, with standard 1-inch margins and 12-point standard font and a bibliography.  You may use APA or Chicago/Turabian style for the citations.  All papers must use a minimum of five primary and five secondary sources. You may use the sources assigned for this course, but you may not count them toward the minimum sources for your project.  At least two of your secondary sources must be academic journal articles. The Homeland Security (DHS) agency is intended to be the stronger line of defense against terrorism in the U.S. Write a 10-12-page paper answering the following questions: How is the DHS structured, and what are its current anti-terror and counter-terror capabilities? Given those capabilities, what does this indicate about what the DHS considers the most likely type of attack and by whom/what (Individuals? Organizations? Domestic militias? Radicalized residents? Foreign nationals?…) What have you identified as DHS areas in need of improvement? What are its strong points? Are there indications of how the DHS works with national intelligence agencies? Comment on this point, examining what may need improving regarding inter-agency relations and cooperation. Summarize your findings and recommendations as an ‘executive brief’ (no more than 2 pages long). Your recommendations should be realistic, soundly based in current structures and capabilities (this includes strengthening those capabilities as identified). It should take into account potential restrictions of human rights, too. It should also reflect the current state of knowledge regarding homeland security and counter- / anti- terrorism. Include a statement that reflects your findings on what types of terror-related incidents are considered most likely to occur inside the U.S. (all 50 states, not just the 48 continental ones).