Law

Read the following case scenario: The former Sameer Shariff, a Saudi Arabian national who changed his name to “The Left Hand of God” and is known to his followers as “Hand,” is a suspected terrorist. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agents believe that he is planning an imminent attack somewhere in Capital City. Under duress to prevent the attack, three DHS agents and three FBI agents storm into Hand’s house, burst into his bedroom, where he is in bed with a woman, and point shotguns at him. They demand to know what he is planning. No Miranda warnings are read. Hand tells them that he has hired Alex “Boom Boom” Jaxon, a known explosives expert, to plant a bomb in the Capital City Arena, with a timer to go off in three hours when the arena will be filled with over 20,000 people for a music concert. Jaxon is known to the police and is in Central City, which is two hours away. He is arrested by Central City police and calls his lawyer in Capital City, who tells him he will meet him there and to remain silent. The lawyer then tells Central City police that they are not to question Jaxon until they arrive in Capital City and the lawyer is present. Central City Police Officer McFadden drives Jaxon to Capital City. McFadden knows that DHS, FBI, and Capital City police are searching the arena, but McFadden is afraid they will not find the bomb in time. By the time that McFadden and Jaxon arrive in Central city, the concert hall is already full of audience members, and the show is set to begin in twenty minutes. McFadden, who knows Jaxon’s family from previous police contacts, tells Jaxon that his mother and two brothers, who have been surveilled by the police for the last six weeks, are at the concert and will die if the bomb goes off. Jaxon leads McFadden to the bomb, which is defused. A crying Jaxon states that his purpose was to kill infidels, but he would never harm his family. Research Fifth Amendment cases, including Miranda v. Arizona, 386 U.S. 436 (1966), which involves custodial interrogation and the right against self-incrimination. In your paper, Determine whether Hand was entitled to Miranda warnings. Explain whether the fact that Hand was not a citizen of the United States affects his rights in relation to the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. Identify whether Hand’s questioning was custodial. Explain whether McFadden’s statement abouthis family constitutes custodial interrogation. Evaluate whether Hand’s statement can be used against him in a court of law. Explain whether Jaxon’s statement be used against him in a court of law. Determine whether Jaxon can testify against Hand.   The Right to Remain Silent paper Must be 750 to 1,000 words in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA Style  (Links to an external site.) Must include a separate title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted For further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013  (Links to an external site.) . Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice  (Links to an external site.)  resource for additional guidance. Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper. For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions  (Links to an external site.)  as well as Writing a Thesis Statement  (Links to an external site.) , refer to the Ashford Writing Center resources. Must use at least three court cases and one scholarly source. The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources  (Links to an external site.)  table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.

I want someone to write about the criminal injustices in America, for example things like the law enforcement system. Paragraph One:  Introduce yourself to the Justice.  Explain why you are writing them (do you agree with their views or not-be sure to identify what those views are) Please explain your constitutional philosophy: illustrate what parts of the Constitution you find to be most sacred, most valuable, or most in need of protecting, and how justices should approach interpreting the constitution.  Explain why you place importance on those parts and include at least one specific historical reference in your explanation.  A specific historical reference could refer to the ideology of the founding fathers or to an event which highlighted the importance of a certain constitutional feature. Paragraph Two:  Choose and discuss two Supreme Court cases. One of them should highlight what you believe was good judicial decision-making and the other should represent what you believe was poor judicial decision-making.  Explain your reasoning for both.   These should reflect your philosophy mentioned above.  Paragraph Three:  Address the constitutional issues that high school students face today.  Do you believe that students have been treated fairly under the constitution?  Cite at least two cases discussed in class as examples (I will provide the in class examples to you) of either fair or unfair treatment and explain your reasoning.  Should the court continue on precedent or change course with regards to teens? Paragraph Four:  What are the future issues that the Court should address?  Explain to the justice what you believe are the most critical issues facing America today, on which the Court should next rule.  What direction would you like to see the Court go in the next decade?  End this paragraph with a graceful concluding sentence.

Many times, on television shows we see crime scene investigators or laboratory personnel zooming in and enhancing video and/or audio files. Is this realistic? Can we zoom in on something really far away and read it? Can audio become crystal clear? Instructions: -Below are the links I provided for you to use if you want to  • Research different audio and video enhancement software programs and see what they are capable of doing in a forensic setting.  • Discuss a minimum of four software programs.  • This list can help get you started:  o Adobe Photoshop: https://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop.html  o Adobe Audition: https://www.adobe.com/products/audition.html  o DVR Examiner: https://dmeforensics.com/dvr-examiner/  o Ocean Systems ClearID: https://www.oceansystems.com/forensic/forensic-PhotoshopPlugins/index.php  o Ocean Systems dTective: https://www.oceansystems.com/forensic_video_analysis/aboutdTective.php  o FFmpeg: https://ffmpeg.org/about.html o iNPUT-ACE: https://input-ace.com/  o Amped: https://ampedsoftware.com/  o iZotope: https://www.izotope.com/en/products.html  o CellBrite: https://www.cellebrite.com/en/home/  o Encase: https://www.guidancesoftware.com/encase-forensic  o FTK: https://accessdata.com/products-services/forensic-toolkit-ftk  o Berla: https://berla.co/

Discuss the pros and cons of lifetime appointment for U.S. Supreme Court justices. Do you think U.S. Supreme Court judges should be appointed for life or should they have term limits, like officials in Congress and the President? Explain your position. Your paper must be at least 5 pages.  Please double space and use New Times Roman 12 point font. Also, please follow APA format when referencing information from outside sources.  Make sure you proofread your paper before submitting.

What role is the criminal justice system serving in today’s Black Lives Matter social movement?  the essay needs to talk about the criminal justice system and the role it plays in the Black Lives Matter movement.

How does government and economics tie into homeless community? What policies about homelessness have been made? What economic factors are discussed when tackling homelessness? How can both the economy and the government work towards ending homelessness.

This paper is about Crimes Against Humanity and its relationship to international law, specifically focus on Genocide. Although this paper is still a research paper, it should veer away from just summarizing information. Instead develop a thesis on what genocide is and what factors drive a country to resort to genocide and its status in international law.  Questions/food for thought- Why does genocide happen? What is it? Examples in history and how they were prosecuted? Nuremberg trials ? Are certain groups scapegoats for country’s failures? Precedents for trials? Also of the 7 sources, 5 need to be academic. Since this is a very last minute, this isn’t priority.  https://borgenproject.org/stages-of-genocide/ this is good infromation

Review Chapters 1 through 14 in the textbook. Topic: Private prisons. The use of private prisons has been debated for years, and now more organizations are calling for their elimination.  Instructions: Answer the following questions in an essay that comprehensively discusses the issues raised by each question. Your answers should be written with correct punctuation, grammar, and citations. Your answers also should be sufficiently detailed to demonstrate your knowledge of the topics raised by the question. To formulate your responses, be sure to utilize your text and research for additional insight and assistance in creating real-world scenarios where applicable. This paper should be between 1,250 and 1,750 words.  What is the structure of a closed managerial system? What is the structure of a private prison? What is the structure of a public prison? Why would states want to use private prisons? Why would states not want to use private prisons?  How might the quality and delivery of services differ between private and public prisons?  What administrative issues might arise from the use of private prisons?  Provide 2–3 illustrative examples to support your position. Note: This assignment will require outside research. Include at least four peer-reviewed resources. You may consult the online Library, the internet, the textbook, other course material, and any other outside resources in supporting your task, using proper citations in APA style.

Answer the following questions in a few paragraphs. As always, write in complete sentences and use whatever evidence you need to support your argument (and always remember to cite your sources). What was the original purpose of electors? Do you think the electoral college should be abolished? Why or why not? If you think it should be abolished, what should it be replaced with, and why would this be a better way of electing a president? If you do not think it should be abolished, tell us why you think it is a good (or at least adequate) system for electing the president.  Make sure you respond to at least 2 other students. Respectful debate is encouraged and expected!

Prompt 1: The process of enacting legislation is a way of effecting change. Use the following website to conduct research this week on a piece of healthcare legislation that has been either presented or passed in the last five years:  www.ncsl.org/research/health.aspx.  Write a summary of the new laws (or proposed laws) and how they progressed through the legal system. Did they experience any setbacks, or did they progress through the system as expected? If they experienced delays, why do you think these delays occurred? **this is a discussion board question prompt..so please use critical thinking..use APA 7th edition..use scholarly reference.***