Law

Students striving for a superlative grade should go above and beyond the minimum requirements of the assignment. Assignment: Address the following after viewing the short video using the text and independent research: Just War Theory   (Links to an external site.) What is meant by a ‘just war’? In your view, how would the US’s most recent wars (Iraq, Afghanistan, Drug War) be judged according to ‘just war theory’? Course Summary: Discuss the ethical issues and/or concepts from this course that you feel you will give the most thought to in the future. Why do you feel this is the case?

Please provide an initial post that is 2-3 paragraphs in length (worth 10 points). Please respond to two of your classmates (worth 5 points each). Discuss how the case manager works with juvenile offenders. How is working with juveniles different? What can help make juvenile offenders successful?

Write a 5-page (minimum) literature review regarding tactical analysis. Find a minimum of 5 peer-reviewed journal articles and write a synthesized literature review that describes the research that has been conducted about your topic(tactical analysis). Be sure to answer the following questions:   Describe the methodology and findings of your topic and how these concepts relate to the field of crime analysis.   How are these theories/frameworks/techniques used to help drive crime analytical techniques and outcomes?   What are the limitations and problems of your topic? How may these be addressed?   Please write this paper using times new roman, 12pt font, double spaced, and APA formatting.   APA formating help: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html (Links to an external site.)

Early in the semester I wanted to know if you became an investigator what type of investigator would you be. Now, you are an investigator. Choose what type of investigator, Major crimes investigator (Robbery, homicide, sex crimes). Gang investigator, narcotics investigator, or Vice (Prostitution, Gambling) investigator. Create a story of a crime that you have investigated. Describe the crime Tell the story of how it happened Explain your investigative tactics Have a few sentences as your arrest report Close with a conviction, and sentencing of your suspect. Your paper must have factual context of the crime that you wrote that you investigated. This means that you must follow the Objectives of an Investigation: Read the seven objectives of a police investigation on page #17. Interrogations must have a Miranda Advisement Remember- If they waive their rights, that means that they will talk to you. Remember- If they invoke their rights, this means that they do not talk to you. Explain your evidence, (You can do this in the report. do not make a PPT presentation like I did for the assault report). Firearms investigations – P 176 Death investigations – P. 201 Theft, Burglary, and Robbery investigations P 226. Drug Investigations – P 271 Arson and Explosives investigations P 302 Computer Crimes – P 317. Closing statements end with a conviction.

Pick three articles which have attempted to address the CJ problems you identified your Writing Assignment.  The idea is to examine what has been learned before.  What data did those studies use to address the CJ problem?  Did the authors feel that data was adequate to address the problem?  What conclusions did they make?  Did their analyses find support for their hypotheses?Write a 3-5 page paper (in APA 7 format) summarizing at least 5 articles what you have learned in the case study.  The chart used in the youtube video makes for a great outline for you to discuss your articles. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcN5s501xTkFor this assignment we are going to focus on the case study (BLOCK 5 only of the Research Methods Framework).

Your final project will highlight a CURRENT HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION AND/OR HUMANITARIAN CONCERN in your country, but will also connect the other topics that you have researched over the course of the class. How to show the human rights violation/humanitarian concern connected to unit assignments: Is it because of economic conditions? Is it from war? Is it a result of government suppression? It may not connect all of the topics we have discussed over the course of the module but you must connect as many as you can and explain in your captions the connection of photo to violation/concern. This will be your final assessment and will be a separate grade from unit assignments. It is strongly recommended that you collect photos as you complete your research for each unit assignment essay/paper. You may need or want to include other visuals such as maps, charts, etc. to help you create a more complete picture of your country. Be creative in choosing how to present your photos.  Will you use PowerPoint?  Will you use Prezi?  Can you create a YouTube video?  Can you organize and create Pinterest boards? You must include a formal reference page that is written in APA format.  It may be wise to keep a running bibliography for all essays and photos. Remember, you are trying to bring awareness of the human rights violation/humanitarian concern to the world. What must be done in order to get everyday people, other foreign governments, and international organization to recognize the problem? Rubric Final Project Rubric (2) Final Project Rubric (2) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identification of Human Rights Violation and/or Humanitarian Concern 5.0 pts A Clear, well-developed, and demonstrates an understanding of issues associated with violation/concern. 4.0 pts B Clear, developed, and demonstrates an understanding of issues associated with violation/concern. 3.0 pts C Weak, inadequately developed, and marginally demonstrates an understanding of issues associated with violation/concern. 2.0 pts D Unclear or incomplete and does not demonstrate an understanding of issues associated with violation/concern. 1.0 pts F No connection between violation/concern and underlining issues. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Supporting Evidence 5.0 pts A Well-supported with a broad spectrum of specific, credible, and relevant photos and captions. 4.0 pts B Adequately supported with a limited spectrum of specific, credible, and relevant photos and captions. 3.0 pts C Inadequately supported with specific, credible, and relevant photos and captions. 2.0 pts D Lacks specific, credible, and relevant photos and captions, or project includes only photos and no captions. 1.0 pts F No connection between photos and captions to the violation/concern. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Creativity 5.0 pts A Presentation of photo documentary is highly effective and demonstrates creativity. 4.0 pts B Presentation of photo documentary is effective and demonstrates creativity. 3.0 pts C Presentation of photo documentary is effective but may lack creativity designed to draw attention to topic. 2.0 pts D Presentation of photos is not effective and lacks creativity. 1.0 pts F Presentation of photos is not related to topic. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Spelling & Grammar 5.0 pts A Polished and demonstrates a high level of proficiency in grammar and spelling. 4.0 pts B Generally polished and demonstrates proficiency in grammar and spelling. 3.0 pts C Somewhat polished and inconsistently demonstrates proficiency in grammar and spelling. 2.0 pts D Lacks polish and does not demonstrate proficiency in grammar and spelling. 1.0 pts F Grammar and spelling are deficient. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Clarity & Organization 5.0 pts A Organized, logical and clearly articulated. Transitions smoothly connect ideas and issues with violation/concern. 4.0 pts B Generally organized, logical and clearly articulated. Transitions often smoothly connect ideas and issues with violation/concern. 3.0 pts C Somewhat organized, logical and clearly articulated. Transitions sometimes used to connect ideas and issues with violation/concern. 2.0 pts D Lacks organization, logic and clarity. Transitions seldom used to connect ideas and issues with violation/concern. 1.0 pts F Argument is not organized or clear. Transitions not used to connect ideas and issues with violation/concern. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reference Page 5.0 pts A Proper use of APA format with no errors. 4.0 pts B Use of APA format is present with few errors. 3.0 pts C APA format is attempted with errors and/or missing requirements/components. 2.0 pts D References listed but not in APA format. 1.0 pts F No references list. 5.0 pts Total Points: 30.0

You are required to prepare answers only answer the last 4 questions and each question should answer with 70 words. i don’t need Introduction and conclusion ((only answers)) . there is a list of sources i have uploaded to you in case you would like to see I did this : 1 who drafted the instrument and who initiated the drafting? 2 What was the process of drafting the instrument? 3 What are the purposes of the instrument? You should do this correctly: 4 What is the legal status of the instrument? Is it binding law or “soft law”? 5 What types of contract is the instrument intended for? 6 How has the instrument been received by scholars and in practice? 7 How do you assess the usefulness of the instrument?

Objectives Plan an advocacy strategy to advance social well-being or develop/propose a new policy (or modify an existing policy) in order to advance human well-being Assignment Part 1– Choose Option 1a or 1b (100 points) Option 1a–proposing new legislation Choose a topic you care deeply about and write a description of legislation you would like to see enacted. You will submit a proposal that models that same steps we practiced in the simulation–submit a document that answers each of the following (1 paragraph response per question minimum unless otherwise indicated) Write a 1-2 page description of your proposed legislation (20 points) Why is this an ethical or moral issue that deserves attention? (10 points) How would current societal views impact views on this issue?(10 points) What level would it be proposed at? Local? State? Federal? (10 points) Who would be additional groups, politicians, etc. that would help advocate for the same policy? (must include at least 2) (10 points) What research/evidence/similar laws are out there that could be modeled in your proposal? — must include at least 3 citations (10 points) Would you use a collaborative strategy, campaign strategy, contest strategy? Ballot initiative? Justify your response (10 points) How would you track that people are actually following the proposed law? (process) (10 points) How would track that your proposed law was actually working? (outcomes) (10 points) Option 1b–proposing modifications to existing or pending legislation For this option you will conduct research on a bill that NASW NE has monitored  (Links to an external site.) , or on an existing local or state law and prepare a proposal to modify existing or pending legislation. To do so, submit a document that answers each of the following (1 paragraph response per question minimum unless otherwise indicated) Write a 1 page summary in your own words of what this bill is intended to achieve. (10 points) What is the status of the bill? (2.5 points) Who sponsored it? (2.5 points) Who supports it? who is likely not to support it? (10 points) How would you amend the bill? Must make at least 3 specific recommendations (10 points) Why is this an ethical or moral issue that deserves attention? (10 points) How would current societal views impact views on this issue? (10 points) Why is it being proposed at a state level? (10 points) Who would be additional groups, politicians, etc. that did/are helping advocate for the bill? (must include at least 2) (10 points) Does the legislation include a way to monitor implementation? (10 points) How would you monitor if the legislation had the anticipated outcomes you were hoping for? (10 points) Part 2 (50 points) Review and synthesize the information you put together for part 1. Your task is now to share this information/proposal. You can either share it with a government official, advocacy group, or a letter to the editor in order to educate the general public.  Write a letter- 1-1.5 pages that achieves the following: Letter utilizes professional letter format (or meets requirements of letter to the editor) (5 points) Letter is addressed to the appropriate individual (representative, or required letter to the editor format) (5 points) Letter outlines the goal/intent of your proposal (5 points) Letter utilizes both logic/evidence as well as emotional appeal and brings in at least 1 source (10 points) Letter includes a specific call to action/suggestions (10 points) Letter is written in a positive and constructive tone–it may challenge others but does so in a civil way (5 points) Letter is succinct and clearly organized, looks professional, no typos (5 points) Screen shot confirming that the letter was actually sent (5 points)

State the objective of the legal department in a hospital or healthcare organization, in general, and the specific objectives of each unit/topic of the practicum. In order to fulfill the requirements to cover each item in each unit, you have to answer the following questions (as applicable): a. What is it? (i.e., define it as it is in literature and as applied in the setting of the practice under investigation, if applicable). b. Why is it? (i.e., the purpose of its conduction or presence). c. Where is it? (i.e., the place of conduction, presence). d. When is it? (i.e., when it is being found or conducted). e. Who? (i.e., who is the responsible for conducting it, and to whom it is directed). f. How? (i.e., the process of its conduction or utilization). The reference guidelines (as policies and procedures) should be referred to as necessary in the item discussion, and the used forms also should be attached (if you got samples from the clinical setting, otherwise, just refer to what is presented and discussed in literature). put your comments (i.e., the strength and weaknesses) in relation to each discussed item, as well as your recommendation to modify it to be more efficient, effective and/or safe to the running system (if needed). Citation and references APA style

Analyze a recent mass shooting which occurred in the US. Research and explain what transpired in detail and the aftermath. Research how the guns were obtained, if there were red flags before the mass shooting, the media coverage surrounding it, and the politics involved (NRA, law enforcement, and legislators). Examine and compare, using the information acquired throughout this semester, what changes or enhancements (if any) can be made to prevent or make it more difficult for it to reoccur. What can and should we do to keep safe? Explain what measures can be taken and the most appropriate/effective way to carry them out. Elaborate your thoughts objectively and clearly. Use facts and statistical data to justify your argument