International Affairs

Review and reflect on the knowledge from orders: 877353, 883561, 887354. Based on your review and reflection, write at least 250–300 words on the following: What were the most compelling topics that you learned about in this course? How did participating in discussions help your understanding of the subject matter? Is anything still unclear that could be clarified? What approaches could have yielded additional valuable information?

Case Study Assignment – GBA 440 – International Business In this case study you will analyze a case in international business and submit it per the schedule in your syllabus.  In your case study, you will need to address the questions by integrating the material into a coherent essay with an introduction, headings and a conclusion, in accordance with APA.  The case study will assess your ability to understand, analyze and synthesize information to produce a clear and coherent conclusion.  The case study must be no longer than 2 pages, double spaced, 12 point font, excluding the bibliography and title page.  The case study analysis should be well structured, include some of your own research, and be grammatically correct.  You will need to bring in information from the text as well as 3-4 outside sources that are relevant to the topic.

The subject is (International relations/ Political science). Topic: British-American geopolitical strategies in the Middle East, and it’s impact on Saudi-Iranian relationships, since 1950s. Researcher should follow these: 1. Abstract. 2. Introduction. 3. Apply ( Neorealism, or structural realism theoretical framework. Mearsheimer), please clarify this (How and why neorealist theoretical framework is adapted and adopted to the context of research). How to apply it? 4. Use verbs for citations in each source that will be used. Like Y argues that, Y points out that, Y states that etc… and link words. 5. Use UK style and structure. 6. Indicate the importance of this research and it’s aims and questions. 7. Use MHRA style. 8. Use 24 appropriate and recent sources. 9. Bibliography should be divided to primary sources like documents from UK and USA archives and secondary sources. Researcher is free to do and use appropriate ways and sources. Please provide me a PhD writer from England, after he/she doing this paper. I will check it and may continue with him/her in my dissertation. primary sources 1. Department of State, ‘Memorandum of Conversation: British Proposal to Organize a Coup d’état in Iran’, National Security Archive (1952) https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu//dc.html?doc=3914380-02-State-Department-Memorandum-of-Conversation 2. Dinsmore, Lee. ‘Telegram From the Consulate General in Dhahran to the Department of State’, State Department (1969)

The subject is (International relations/ Political science). Topic: British-American geopolitical strategies in the Middle East, and it’s impact on Saudi-Iranian relationships, since 1950s. Researcher should follow these: 1. Abstract. 2. Introduction. 3. Apply ( Neorealism, or structural realism theoretical framework. Mearsheimer), please clarify this (How and why neorealist theoretical framework is adapted and adopted to the context of research). How to apply it? 4. Use verbs for citations in each source that will be used. Like Y argues that, Y points out that, Y states that etc… and link words. 5. Use UK style and structure. 6. Indicate the importance of this research and it’s aims and questions. 7. Use MHRA style. 8. Use 24 appropriate and recent sources. 9. Bibliography should be divided to primary sources like documents from UK and USA archives and secondary sources. Researcher is free to do and use appropriate ways and sources. Please provide me a PhD writer from England, after he/she doing this paper. I will check it and may continue with him/her in my dissertation. primary sources 1. Department of State, ‘Memorandum of Conversation: British Proposal to Organize a Coup d’état in Iran’, National Security Archive (1952) https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu//dc.html?doc=3914380-02-State-Department-Memorandum-of-Conversation 2. Dinsmore, Lee. ‘Telegram From the Consulate General in Dhahran to the Department of State’, State Department (1969)

The paper shall analyze the evolving security landscape of the past few years, narrowing its focus to cyber attacks. The analysis shall include an historical, ideological, operational, and outcome-based evaluation.   The paper must be at least 8-10 full pages of CONTENT with normal margins.  Papers that do not meet the minimum length requirement will be marked down. Tables, graphs, or charts should be presented in an appendix, but is not counted toward the minimum paper length. Please use the PDF File and power point to assist.

This is a research essay. Please use academic sources only. Please include an essay question/title: ‘Essay question must have a combination of an interesting and puzzling question, a clear argument, theory/conceptual foundations, a coherent method, appropriate data and robust analysis. Furthermore, the topic and theoretical/methods can be pluralist, and the data can come from a range of sources’. Please use essay format as in; Intro – 4 Body paragraphs – Conclusion Please include critical analysis and data information Please include a plagiarism report.

In a paper 1,000-1,250 words, complete the following: 1. Explain cultural factors that influence the development of ethical relationships in or between cultures. 2. Evaluate the different perspectives on the ethics of developing, maintaining, or ending relationships in members of different cultural groups? 3. Explain how differing cultural values and norms may influence conflict styles. 4. Give specific illustrations that show different conflict styles of people from different cultures. 5. Project must have a minimum of five scholarly sources. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. This assignment assesses the following competencies: Comp 4.1 Evaluate the connection between ethical communication and different worldviews. Comp 2.3 Compare and contrast how communicative behaviors reflect various cultural norms.

Liberalism, Economic Nationalism and Marxism have for decades been the central paradigms in international relations and International Political Economy (IPE). In no more than 1000 word explain how each of these perspectives can explain how countries may potentially respond to the negative implications that COVID-19 has on their domestic economies?  Students are expected to read widely enough to provide them with sufficient grounding to write a comprehensive submission. Students can cite 3 sources. No citations from electronic citations are accepted.

Being from the USA, describe how you would negotiate a contract with a businessperson from France. How will you approach them? How does the French communication pattern and listening habit differ from your own culture? Reading suggestions How does our Language Shape the Way We Think? (Boroditsky, 2009) When Cultures Collide – Bridging the Communication Gap (Lewis, 2005) – pp. 63-79 Richard Lewis Communication model (PDF) Communication Patterns at Multicultural Organizational Meetings The Role of Cultural Distance in International Negotiations International Negotiation Quiz http://www.leadershipcrossroads.com/rs_nqui.asp? Additional Resources Center for Intercultural Learning – Country Insights (WWW)

•the nature of the democratic peace thesis •how the democratic peace works (i.e., the factors that stops democracies from going to war with each other). (e.g., see Bruce Russett’s chapter in the textbook and some of his other texts on the reading list, esp. his book, Grasping the Democratic Peace) •how robust are those mechanisms? If all states become democracies, does that mean war will be a thing of the past? (e.g., see Fukuyama’s book The End of History and the Last Man for such an optimistic reading) •you should also consider some of the alternative positions (e.g., Geis et al’s work on the ‘dark side’ of the democratic peace or Russett’s reappraisal of his earlier work in ‘Bushwacking the Democratic Peace’ or Snyder and Mansfield’s work on the war prone nature of states transitioning to democracy – all of which argue that democracy or democratisation can cause war.)