History

This is a REACTION paper to the leadership of a historic figure. This is not an information paper. Do not tell me the overall content of your chosen figure’s leadership fundamentals or style. I want the student to REACT (reflectively consider) and engage with the chosen figure’s leadership, perhaps even just a single idea/issue that arises from the study. You may need to introduce/summarize the figure’s leadership, but the majority of the paper should be reflective analysis (using the characteristics regarding the fundamentals of leadership and adaptive leadership). Imagine I asked for your opinion on an issue in class. You should state clearly and concisely what you understand the problem/issue to be, and then give a cogent response. Choose a figure from the following: Alexander the Great, Jesus, Winston Churchill, Adolf Hitler, Mohammed, Dwight Eisenhower, Joseph Smith (1805-1844), Abraham Lincoln, Joan of Arc, George Washington, Ghengis Khan, Maria Theresa of Austria.

(1) With respect to the war in Bosnia, please discuss the difference between ethnic cleansing and genocide as committed in Srebrenica. How useful is the distinction between these two terms and when did ethnic cleansing turn to genocide? (2) With the help of Kim Allar’s interview with Admiral Lopez, please think about the limits and challenges of Western intervention in Bosnia. One of his main points suggests that such a peacekeeping force needs to be adequately equipped and endowed with a robust mandate. How does that differ from earlier mandates for example for the UN safe zone such as in Srebrenica? (3) Much of the literature on Bosnia (and my introductory lecture) focus on the responsibility of leaders such as Slobodan Miloševi? for inciting violence to expand their own power. Keith Brown’s perspective is different in that he focuses on incidents such as in Vevcani from which public debates ensued that reinforced ethnic stereotypes laying the groundwork for ethnic strife. Please discuss Dr. Brown’s approach and with it the question of where ethnic hatred came from in a country with a high degree of intermarriage and 45 years of peace after WWII.   (4) Please engage Selma Leydesdorff’s work on the Women of Srebrenica to discuss the trauma her interview partners experienced and shared with her. Which emotions result from this trauma, what are the women’s prime motivations in sharing their stories, and how does it impact you, the readers today, to hear these stories?

Learning Objective: Critically engage with the reading by writing a summary. To critically think and interact with fellow students to get a deeper understanding of the text. To apply historical readings to present day situations. You must write about that weekly reading The First three paragraphs are summaries of the readings. The Fourth Paragraph is your opinion on the reading and how it relates to you personally.   In your summary try to define Redlining and how Fresno is still divided today.  Now also look at your OWN community and talk about the racial, class and gender spacial divides.  Where is the “good” school and where are you not supposed to go to at night. Is this still prevalent. Lecture about the reading:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROLDJm0sQrE&feature=youtu.be Videos about Fresno and community: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpP4qw3DtLQ&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ydu_bDkWcU

Who is the author and why should we consider that person an authority on the subject?  This information may be found in the book/article.  It may just take a quick Google search.  If they are deceased, you should still explain why they were an authority. The author’s thesis. Many writers do not state a clear thesis, therefore you may have to figure it out yourself and state it in your own words. Sometimes, there may be three or four main points, not just one.  If you find a statement that stands out to you as the thesis, AVOID PUTTING IT IN DIRECT QUOTES IN YOUR PAPER.  The thesis should be interpreted in your words if at all possible. What is the author’s argument and what information/evidence and sources does he/she use to support that argument?  Make sure to be specific enough that your review explains to your reader what the article/book is about without going into so much detail you re-write the book.  What are the author’s general conclusions? Does the author explain whey they think their work is significant?  Do they explain how it is different/similar to others?

Construct an essay for each prompt you select that answers the question, is not plagiarized, and shows a deep historical understanding of the concepts. EACH ESSAY should be AT LEAST 350 words in length and THOROUGHLY answer the prompt.  Submit your essays by the due date listed. What was the Columbian exchange? Which elements of the exchange had the greatest impact on the Americas? On Afro-Eurasia?

How does the decision in Geduldig v. Aiello (1974) compare to the decisions in the other three cases we read? Does it reflect increasing equality? On what basis was Geduldig decided? Would the decision in Geduldig be the same after the 1978 amendment to the Civil Rights Act in the form of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act? Why or why not? Make specific reference to provisions of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. Your response should be at least 200 words long and answer each question specifically. You must include citations in-text and a reference page.  I included the cases below.  https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/408/228/450803/ http://ohms.libs.uga.edu/viewer.php?cachefile=russell/RBRL175OHD-012.xml https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/400/542.html https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/400/542/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/417/484/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1973/72-777 https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/pregnancy.cfm https://www.aauw.org/resources/legal/laf/pregnancy-discrimination/

·        Minimum of 2 outside scholarly sources (in addition to course text) Instructions For this assignment, you will compare/contrast a controversial topic in lifespan development – the immunization controversy in the medical profession. Be certain that your answers are cogent, well-formed, and supported by outside research rather than based on personal opinion. Write about the immunization controversy in the medical profession. Be sure to address why people delay immunizations and why some refuse all immunizations for their children. As a medical professional, how might you educate these caregivers about their child’s health and development concerning this issue? What is your role in this process/situation? How can you best respect the caregiver’s wishes and provide the best healthcare in this situation? Writing Requirements (APA format) ·        Length: 1.5-2 pages (not including title page or references page) ·        1-inch margins ·        Double spaced ·        12-point Times New Roman font ·        Title page ·        In-text citations ·        References page (minimum of 2 outside scholarly sources in addition to course text)

1.        Significance of the topic. 2.       Why you chose the topic? 3.       Background of that time in History 4.       Summary of your research 5.      What conditions or changes did it bring about?

book name Revolutionary Mothers by Carol Berkin  double spaced, Times New Roman font size 12 . ·       Quotes from the book should be cited in parenthetical style at the end of the sentence: “FDR wasn’t always the most beloved president in America” (Brinkley,  p.17).                                                                                                          (Author, pg. #). ·       Keep citations consistent throughout the entire paper Be conscious of the amount of direct citation that you use. No more than two sentences of direct quotation per citation ·       Keep citations consistent throughout the entire paper Be conscious of the amount of direct citation that you use. No more than two sentences of direct quotation per citation ·       There is no need for a header of any sorts on your first page of text. That is why you attached a cover sheet. Your first page of the text should begin indented at the top of the page. ·       Since you are only citing one source, there is no need for a bibliography ·       Please be sure to fully answer the question for which you are responding to

1) Watch 47 minute video will provide link. 2)Directions Summarize and critique one of the Ancient Egypt video we watch:  about one paragraph (5-10 sentences) for the summary and about two pages (600 words) for the critique. Summaries should be general and not include specific details; I just want to be sure you watched the video. Critiques should explore 1) what the video did well, 2) what they could have done better, and 3) what you feel is still missing. Cite specific examples from the films using MLA format.  This is your opinion; if you support your points, you will do fine. Please include a heading (your name, my name, HUM 101-W03, and the date you submit); the heading should be single spaced and does not count towards the word count. Please use correct grammar and spelling. Please use MLA correctly.  To cite the video use the following format:  (Ancient Egypt).