Health & Medical

1) The data gathered by health officials to study most diseases in modern medicine is on what group? Why is it incorrect to base all of human health on heterosexual white men?(Citation/Hint: Plataforma SINC. “Medical Textbooks Use White, Heterosexual Men As A ‘Universal Model’.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 17 October 2008. .)2) Ethnic minorities are subject to increased disparities in disease prevalence and care. Why is it important that we know this? What are some explanations as to why this is?(Citation/Hints:  Bertron P, Barnard ND, Mills M. Racial bias in federal nutrition policy, Part II: Weak guidelines take a disproportionate toll. J Natl Med Assoc. 1999;91(4):201-208.Satia JA. Diet-related disparities: understanding the problem and accelerating solutions. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(4):610-615. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2008.12.019Hoffman KM, Trawalter S, Axt JR, Oliver MN. Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(16):4296-4301. doi:10.1073/pnas.1516047113Rodríguez JE, Campbell KM. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Prevalence and Care of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2017;35(1):66-70. doi:10.2337/cd15-0048)3) In your own words, why is it important to study health and nutrition in a truly diverse population?

Eating Disorders: Module 8 Question Based on the readings for this module respond to this question.  Each response should be a minimum of three paragraphs synthesizing the content from the readings.  Submissions which are cut and pasted or not in the student’s own words will get a zero.   Use appropriate APA format for references.  1.) Although medications do not have specific indications for the treatment of eating disorders what medications do you see as being helpful and what is the rationale for those you have listed?

Guidelines for each assignment: (APA 7 format required)·        Indicate the objective you are addressing (OBJECTIVES 7 and 8) see attached·        Why is this a key competency for Nurse Mangers? (a minimum of 1 reference from a peer reviewed journal is required)·        Explain how you achieved this objective? (Be specific and detailed). Possible ways to meet each objective include, but are not limited to: Interactions with your preceptor? Meeting attended? Interview of another professional in the agency.If none of the above allow you to fully achieve the objective, you may supplement by referencing content from peer reviewed journal articles with the permission of your professor

Research a federal agency within the U.S. federal government that is a stakeholder in health care. Consider the complexity of the issues that decision makers at this agency must consider. Write a research paper of 1,000-1,250 words addressing the following: Give an overview of the agency. Explain the types of concerns the agency addresses. Describe the impact the agency has on health care policy and delivery. Explain how each branch of government (i.e., judicial, legislative, and executive) impacts the agency’s mission.  Identify at least one current initiative the agency considers a priority, and provide a summary of the initiative. Explain whether it is a health law or health policy and why. Describe how and why a health policy analyst needs to consider policy problems and health economics to make decisions. A minimum of three scholarly sources must be cited, including your textbook. Wilensky, S. E., & Teitelbaum, J. B. (2020). Essentials of Health Policy and Law. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Describe Data Warehousing, Data Mining and Analytics and their role in improving healthcare quality.

Case study: Chapter 7-8.   Research the evolution of hospitals in the U.S.  What has led to the expansion as well as the downsizing of hospitals across the U.S.?  Do you believe that downsizing can be avoided based on the information you found in your research?  Why or why not?     Writing Requirements 3–4 pages in length  (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list) Include at least two peer reviewed sources that are properly cited   Reference: ·      Chapter 7-8 of the book see attached  ·      Research more for Reference

Design an individualized stress management program to promote healthy life-style changes for yourself during the pandemic era. This program will help you to cope with everyday stress and to decrease vulnerability to stressful situations related to COVID-19. The program should include the following:Identify one stressor that is causing unhealthy results in your  life, List the problems associated with having to cope with this stressor,Put together a plan of action for reducing the effects of this stressor,List and explain the obstacles to the original plan to reduce the effects of this stressor, andExplain how you will overcome those obstacles.Double spaced, 5-7 page long.Personalize your program. DO NOT take one directly from any other source.

Discussion Board Forum 3 Topic: CDC’s Top Ten Public Health Achievements of Workplace Safety. Read the article CDC’s Top Ten Public Health Achievements, located in the Reading/Study folder of this module/week. 1. Discuss the top 10 achievements of mining workplace safety. Give at least 1 additional reference to back this up.  2. Also, comment on future directives in public health as provided in the article. 3. Discuss workplace safety in a job or enterprise where you hope to work after completing your studies .You will submit one 350-word thread to the questions posed in the forum.  You should support your responses and provide 1 citation

I’ve written 1/2 my discussion section and need help writing it to max 1000 words or less. Therefore, I was hoping to get some additional help. I’ve writeten an outline and where more information can be written. I need to include 15 APA in-text citations for this section. I’m going to include a couple of annotated bibs BUT not all these anotated bibs are useful.Here is a general idea:DiscussionThe purpose of this section is to evaluate and interpret the results, especially with respect to the original research question. Start off with a brief, nontechnical summary of the results. In other words, tell the reader about the main findings without using statistical terminology. Then go on to discuss the implications of the results. It is also important to discuss how the results relate to the literature you cited in the introduction. In other words, emphasize any theoretical consequences of the results.You might (or might not) also mention any limitations of the study and any suggestions for future research in this section. Finally, you need an ending paragraph in which you make a final summary statement of the conclusions you have drawn. You are also encouraged, when appropriate, to comment on the importance and relevance of your findings. How are your findings related to the big picture? Thus, this section should contain an absolute minimum of three paragraphs: the non-technical summary, discussion of the results and their implications, and the concluding paragraph.Questions needing to be answered in teh discussion section1) On the basis of the literature and the behavioral study outcome as seen in Figure 3, please provide a rationale for deciding whether you injected apomorphine or d-amphetamine in this study.answer: the data is not suggestive that neither drug was injected due to the non-signifant data and unsuccessful surgery to damage the SNpc if we did we would have seen a contraversive for apmorepohine and ipsiversive for d-amphetamine… we are not sure which drug due to unsccuesful surgery2) Would apomorphine or d-amphetamine be the better drug to conduct a pre- and post-lesion behavioral assay? In other words, which one should be used to test behavior before a lesion is made and after a lesion is made?3) Why would you recommend waiting at least seven days after a 6-OHDA lesion is made to begin administering apomorphine and testing the rotational behavior?4) How would you account for the drug-induced rotation after apomorphine and after d-amphetamine treatment?5) How would you try to cure Parkinson’s disease using the concepts that you’ve learned from this laboratory exercise?

As the healthcare paradigm shifts from treating illness toward preventing illness, providers are challenged to adopt new models of care delivery and to embrace evolving concepts of value-driven reimbursement strategies. Moreover, healthcare providers must give increased attention to the need to improve healthcare in a manner that improves health outcomes across population groups and the entire nation as part of the population health approach. There are a variety of challenges facing healthcare leaders. The Managed Healthcare Executive published the top 6 items to watch. Read the Top 6 Challenges Healthcare Executives Face in 2020 (Links to an external site.) For this assignment, you are tasked with discussing how the issues on this list relate to population health, analyzing why these challenges exist, discovering research-based proposed solutions to these challenges, and debating the pros and cons of each of these solutions. The assignment consists of three parts. Part 1: Identify Challenges (2-3 pages) Choose five of the issues on the ACHE survey list and discuss 3-5 challenges surrounding each issue to analyze from a population health perspective. Each challenge should be a sub-heading in this part of the paper. Present the challenge, describe it, and provide some history or background, based on credible research sources. If you need writing assistance, see the Writing Center in the CSU Global Library (Links to an external site.). Part 2: Analysis of Challenges (3-4 pages) Explain each challenge you identified in Part 1 and provide a comprehensive discussion on why each has broad and far-reaching implications for improving the health of the U.S. population. Use data and scholarly research to support your thinking and bolster your discussion. Part 3: Proposed Solutions and Recommendations (3-4 pages) Discuss how the population-health paradigm can contribute to solutions for each of the five ACHE survey issues you selected. For each issue from the survey you discussed, make a specific recommendation you have identified in the research. Create a table to analyze the recommendations that identifies the following components: Pros and cons of this solution you have located. Arguments for and against this solution. Proponents or critics of this solution. Narrative discussion of your analysis. Discuss your analysis from the table. This requires critical analysis. You will want to assess the solution as well as their detractors and supporters and any possible biases in each. You will want to think through how solutions would be implemented, funded, supported, and received by various stakeholders, such as medical professionals, government, and the public. Requirements: The complete paper should consist of eight to ten pages, excluding the required title and reference pages. You must include at least eight credible sources, five of which must be peer-reviewed, scholarly sources. You may not use the textbook as one of your scholarly sources.