Ethics

Write a short composition consisting of at least one and a half pages but no more than three pages of a nonsense essay, where you describe three logically impossible scenarios, and why they are logically impossible? Please explain.

Discuss the following: ·       Define the term statesmanship and explain its relevance to effective and ethical public administration.  ·       Evaluate historical models for government administration. ·       Compare and contrast with American founding principles. ·     Synthesize a Biblical/covenantal model of statesmanship, leadership, and organizational behavior with the above. You will discuss assigned questions for the Module/Week. ·       Answers to questions must be supported by research and citations. It is not unusual, for instance, to have 3–4 citations per paragraph in doctoral-level research. ·       Remember also that writing a research paper, especially at the doctoral-level, requires you to weave in ideas from numerous sources and then in turn synthesizing those ideas to create fresh insights and knowledge. ·       Must include Biblical integration (the Fischer sources will help to that end) Fischer, Kahlib (2010).  A Biblical Perspective on Organizational Behavior and Leadership Shafritz, J. & Hyde, A. (2017). Classics of Public Administration

Assessment task details: You are an ethics and governance officer working for a listed corporation Copco. The board of Copco has asked for a briefing paper to be prepared in one of the cases below.  In the essay, you are required to outline and then analyze the case using the concepts and ideas outlined in Gioia 1993; Husted 1993, Jons & Ryan 1998, Victor & Cullen 1998 and Monahan & Quinn 2008. Explore the interaction between organizational context and the issue (moral intensity, moral language, and framing) then and then address the following questions.  1. What role does organizational schemas/scripts/moral language/ethical work climate splay in ethical decision making within this case? 2. How can unethical/poor decisions be avoided? 3. Are ethical leadership, codes, and raining adequate responses to preventing similar problems at CorpCo, or does the board need to do more? Critically discuss with reference to the course and assessment task 1 literature, theory, concepts, and further research.  You are required to formulate an argument, undertake research to locate academic references, and support your argument with theories covered in this course.  You are also required to table recommendation for the board to consider based on your analysis of the issue, including future action and possible barriers (these must be theory-driven/evidence-based) You have at least 12 academic references to support your argument from online databased such as EBSCO, ProQuest, emerald, science direct, etc) Below are the topic that I have chooses.  Topic: “Greg Mortimer Cruise Ship” In 2020 Covid19 has rocked the Globe. The board would like a board paper with recommendations on the Greg Mortimer Cruise Ship case. Explore the interaction between organizational context and the issue (moral intensity, moral language, and framing) then and then address the following questions. 1. What role does organizational schemas/scripts/moral language/ethical work climates play in ethical decision making within this case? 2. How can unethical/poor decisions be avoided? 3. Are ethical leadership, codes, and training adequate responses to preventing similar problems at CorpCo, or does the board need to do more? Critically discuss with reference to the course and assessment task 1 literature, theory, concepts, and further research. Literature pointers: Alexander, H (2020) ‘Give limited information truthfully’  (Links to an external site.) : The extrication of a cruise ship, The Age  Gioia, D (1992) ‘Pinto fires and personal ethics: A script analysis of missed opportunities’,  (Links to an external site.)  Journal of Business Ethics,  Vol.11(5), pp.379-389 Husted, B. W. (1993) ‘Reliability and the design of ethical organizations: A rational systems approach’, Journal of Business Ethics, 12(10), 761-769. Jones, T.M. & Ryan, L.V. (1998) ‘The effect of organizational forces on individual morality: Judgment, moral approbation, and behavior ‘, Business Ethics Quarterly, 8 (3), 431-45. Monahan, S. C., & Quinn, B. A. (2006) ‘Beyond ‘bad apples’ and ‘weak leaders’ Toward a neo-institutional explanation of organizational deviance’, Theoretical Criminology, 10(3), 361-385. Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988) ‘The organizational bases of ethical work climates’,  Administrative Science Quarterly, 101-125. Chicago

The purpose of this assessment is for students to demonstrate the capacity to develop an ethical argument/s based on the four ethical principles: autonomy, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence.  Governments should have the authority to stop citizens from participating in community activities when they refuse immunizations. Healthcare Ethics: Governments should have the authority to stop citizens from participating in community activities when they refuse immunizations.

how do moral standards differ from law, etiquettes, and commandments

Students will use their allocated topic to develop a sound ethical argumentative opinion piece. Assignment details: During the 1st week of lectures your tutor will allocate a topic for discussion from the prescribed four options. Using the allocated topic given to you construct an argumentative essay.   Purpose: The purpose of this assessment is for students to demonstrate the capacity to develop an ethical argument/s based on the four ethical principles: autonomy, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence.   TOPIC 4. Governments should have the authority to stop citizens from participating in community activities when they refuse immunizations.

1) Summarize the arguments employed by the authors to support their claim that the moral judgment of psychopaths is impaired and that therefore, psychopaths should not be prosecuted in the criminal justice system.  2) Critically evaluate these arguments – that is, are the authors’ arguments for why psychopaths have impaired moral behaviour strong or weak? Back up your evaluation of these arguments using the basic theories of ethics discussed in the first week of class.

As a principal, you will be expected to make numerous sound and moral legal decisions regarding student rights in the school setting. Examples of such student rights issues include freedom of speech, locker and backpack searches, personal privacy, and due process for students with exceptionalities. A principal must act with integrity and fairness to ensure the school system is held accountable for every student’s academic and social success. To be an effective leader and decision-maker on such issues, the principal should be familiar with cases that specifically speak to student rights in the educational arena. Part 1: Case Analysis Using the “Case Analysis Template,” address each step of the decision-making model to render a decision for Case 14. Part 2: Rationale Support the case analysis with a 500-750 word rationale explaining the decisions you made and how those decisions: Support the school’s vision and mission and safeguard the values of democracy, equity, and diversity. Promote social justice and ensure that individual student needs inform all aspects of schooling. Promote collaboration, trust, learning, and high expectations. Cite the case and any other source documents as appropriate. APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

Instructions Review the following ethical dilemmas: John Doe has decided to clone himself. He is sterile. He cannot find anyone to marry him. He wishes to have children. He knows that he will not be able to love a child that is adopted or not connected directly to him biologically. He will be making use of a new procedure that involves taking his skin cells to produce a twin. The twin starts out as an embryo and grows into a child. The child in this case will have the same genetic information as John Doe. John Doe and his child will be twins. Jane Doe is eighteen. For as long as she can remember she has been sexually attracted to other females. Her parents belong to a religion that has a religious text stating that God forbids one to be a lesbian. This religion goes on further to say that lesbians will be punished in the afterlife. Jane Doe is debating whether she should tell her parents about her sexual attraction. She has not yet decided if she should come out to her parents and live as a lesbian now that she is a legal adult. Instructions With the two situations above, answer the following questions: What is the relation between ethics and religion? Formulate and investigate the relation. For each case, determine the ethical path of conduct. Then, determine what paths of conduct would be unethical For each case, what would emotivism say to appraise what you determine is the ethical form of conduct? For each case, would a natural law ethicist agree with what you say is the ethical form of conduct? Why or why not? Articulate, explain, and evaluate in each case an approach that makes use of divine command ethics.

In Chapter 1 of your text, you saw how moral reasoning involves moving back and forth between general, abstract ideas like principles and values and particular concrete judgments about what is good or right, and seeking to find a kind of agreement or equilibrium between those. In Chapters 3, 4, and 5, you were introduced to utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics. Each of these ethical theories represents different ways of reasoning about ethical questions, based in different account of the principles, values, and other conceptions that inform the “abstract” side of the dialectic. In this course, and in much of life, the “concrete” ethical issues that receive the most attention are frequently those that elicit passionate responses and widespread debate, affect large numbers of people, involve matters of deep significance like life and death or fundamental rights, and so on. However, as important as these issues are, there is often a limit to how much impact most individuals can have on such matters; instead, the place where ethics and moral reasoning have their greatest impact is in one’s local community. Thus, in this final discussion board, you will demonstrate your grasp of the relation between the abstract ideas in one of these theories and a concrete ethical issue or social problem in your local community. Engage the community: Begin by finding an ethical issue or social problem that currently impacts or has recently impacted your local or regional community (such as your neighborhood, town or city, county, school district, religious community, or something of similar scope to any of these). Briefly summarize the issue or problem, and provide a link to a news article, video, or some other resource that documents the issue or problem so that your fellow students can learn more about it when formulating their responses to you. Apply the theory: Next, choose one of the ethical theories and discuss how the moral reasoning of the theory might be used to address or resolve the issue or problem. Evaluate the reasoning: In evaluating the application of the moral theory you may, for example, consider one or more questions like: Does this differ from the way this issue is currently being addressed? Does it present a better response than another ethical approach would? Does the theory present an adequate response to the issue, or does it leave significant aspects of the issue unresolved? Does applying the theory to this issue raise other problems or concerns? In light of this issue, are there ways the principles or values of the theory might need to be modified from the form that we studied in class?