English

T2.2 Inferences and Predictions Instructions: This task consists of 2 parts.  Part I requires that you write 6 sentences. Observe the picture Hurricane picture of 3 persons running to save their life  What are the details? What is obvious in the text (picture)? Write 2 sentences that explain or describe the picture. What inference can you make? Look at the details. What can be assumed from the picture? Write 2 inferences.  What prediction will you make? 1. Consider the details, inference, and personal experiences. 2. What do you think will happen next? Write 2 sentences.  NOTE: Refer to Module 2. Remember, all sentences must be connected  Write your sentences in the following table: Details Inference Prediction                   Part II requires that you write 1 sentence.  Search online for a billboard that includes a positive message for the people in the picture.   What can you infer or predict about the content of this billboard?  Use what you can infer or predict from the image to write a positive message to the people in the picture. (1 sentence) Use a word processor, like Word, for this task. Include bibliographical references in the writing. Upload the document using the attach file button of the task. Note: Announcements will be posted regularly in the Announcements section. Make sure to visit it constantly to know tasks, due dates, updates, and further instructions.

English|A Rose for Emily Review|Get custom homework help from vetted experts in 100+ courses and programs. 24/7

Signature Assignment: God’s Story Research Paper Overview Assignment Overview In this course, we are learning that the stories in Exodus and Deuteronomy are an integral part of the grand story of Christian Scripture. In many ways, God’s action in and through Moses and the Israelites are a microcosm of the overarching themes of creation, fall, and redemption that find meaning and movement throughout the entirety of the Bible. Exodus and Deuteronomy are of particular importance because it is here that God initiates his plan of redemption among the Israelites. In order to better understand the meaning and implications of God’s redemptive work in the Old Testament, you will choose a person or concept that is highlighted in the course for further research and analysis. The topic choices for research and analysis are Moses, Miriam, Covenant, the Decalogue, or the Golden Calf. Note that each of these topics has a corresponding article posted in the course from Dictionary of the Old Testament: Pentateuch. The Signature Assignment affords you an extended time to explore Exodus/Deuteronomy in light of the following four questions: How does the topic (Moses, Miriam, Covenant, the Decalogue, or the Golden Calf) connect to the larger themes of creation, fall, and redemption within the overarching story of the Bible? What is important to know about the history, culture, and/or theology surrounding this person or concept? What was the original meaning of this concept or significance of this person within Exodus/Deuteronomy? What insights gained could be meaningful for our context today? Assignment Requirements Review the Signature Assignment: God’s Story Research Paper Instructions [DOWNLOAD] for full instructions.Your research, analysis, and response to these questions will take the form of a research paper, and the project will be completed in three stages: Part 1: Project Plan Part 2: First Draft Part 3: Final Paper God’s Story Research PaperBIBL100SignatureAssignmentInstructionsOverviewIn this course, we are learning that the stories in Exodus and Deuteronomy are an integral partof the grand story of Christian Scripture. In many ways, God’s action in and through Moses andthe Israelites are a microcosm of the overarching themes of creation, fall, and redemption thatfind meaning and movement throughout the entirety of the Bible. Exodus and Deuteronomy areof particular importance because it is here that God initiates his plan of redemption among theIsraelites. In order to better understand the meaning and implications of God’s redemptive workin the Old Testament, you will choose a person or concept that is highlighted in the course forfurther research and analysis. The topic choices for research and analysis are Moses, Miriam,Covenant, the Decalogue, or the Golden Calf. Note that each of these topics has acorresponding article posted in the course from ?Dictionary of the Old Testament: Pentateuch?.The signature assignment affords you an extended time to explore Exodus/Deuteronomy in lightof the following four questions:1.How does the topic (Moses, Miriam, Covenant, the Decalogue, or the Golden Calf)connect to the larger themes of creation, fall, and redemption within the overarchingstory of the Bible?2.What is important to know about the history, culture, and/or theology surrounding thisperson or concept?3.What was the original meaning of this concept or significance of this person withinExodus/Deuteronomy?4.What insights gained could be meaningful for our context today?Your research, analysis, and response to these questions will take the form of a research paper,and the project will be completed in three stages:?Part 1: Project Plan? – Topic, Thesis, Resources, and Outline.?Part 2: First Draft? – Introduction, plus body paragraphs addressing Questions 1, 2, and3.?Part 3: Final Paper? – Revisions of first draft, plus body paragraphs addressing Question4, and a conclusion.Part 1: Project PlanPart 1: Submit a Project Plan, to include the following:?Topic? – choose ?one:? Moses, Miriam, Covenant, the Decalogue, or the Golden Calf.?Thesis? – what is the central message/argument of the paper? See the APU WritingCenter resource ?Thesis Statements? for help.?Outline ?- organize the outline to address the following four assignment questions.Include two or more subpoints and supporting quotations for each main idea.1.Main Idea #1: How does the topic (Moses, Miriam, Covenant, the Decalogue, orthe Golden Calf) connect to the larger themes of creation, fall, and redemptionwithin the overarching story of the Bible?a.Subpoint #1i.Supporting quotationb.Subpoint #2i.Supporting quotation2.Main Idea #2: What is important to know about the history, culture, and/ortheology surrounding this person or concept?a.Subpoint #1i.Supporting quotationb.Subpoint #2i.Supporting quotation3.Main Idea #3: What was the original meaning of this concept or significance ofthis person within Exodus/Deuteronomy?a.Subpoint #1i.Supporting quotationb.Subpoint #2i.Supporting quotation4.Main Idea #4: What insights gained could be meaningful for our context today?a.Subpoint #1i.Supporting quotationb.Subpoint #2i.Supporting quotation?Resources? – include an APA-formatted References list with at least the followingsources:?The Drama of Scripture?;?the accompanying topic article found in the course from ?Dictionary of the OldTestament: Pentateuch ?(i.e. the article about ?Moses, Miriam, Covenant, theDecalogue, or the Golden Calf?;??two? additional sources from the ?APU Library?; see the APU Writing Center’sResearch Tips and Resources? for suggestions about finding good resources.NOTE: While you will likely reference the Bible, it does not count toward one of your fourrequired sources. Also, in APA style, classical works – including the Bible – are ?not? listed in the References page. Embed biblical citations within the text as follows: “Then Mosesturned and went down the mountain, carrying the two tablets of the covenant in hishands” (Exod 32:15, NRSV). Only indicate the Bible version in the first citation; it is notnecessary to identify each citation as NRSV.Assignment Expectations?Submit the assignment in Times New Roman 12 point font.?The Project Plan is 2 pages in length.?Outline identifies the introduction/thesis statement, at least four main ideas, and3-4 subpoints beneath each main idea.?List references in APA format.Part 2: First DraftPart 2: Submit a first draft, to include the following:Introduction with thesis statement.? See the APU Writing Center resources ?ThesisStatements? and ?Introductions and Conclusions? for help.Body paragraphs? that address the following ?three ?(out of four) assignment questions:1.How does the topic (Moses, Miriam, Covenant, the Decalogue, or the GoldenCalf) connect to the larger themes of creation, fall, and redemption within theoverarching story of the Bible?2.What is important to know about the history, culture, and/or theology surroundingthis person or concept?3.What was the original meaning of this concept or significance of this personwithin Exodus/Deuteronomy?Body paragraphs? embed research and analysis from scholarly sources and containin-text citations.References page,? formatted in APA style, minimally includes:?The Drama of Scripture?;?the accompanying topic article found in the course from ?Dictionary of the OldTestament: Pentateuch?;?two? additional sources from the ?APU Library?.?NOTE: In APA style, classical works – including the Bible – are ?not? listed in theReferences page. Embed biblical citations within the text as follows: “ThenMoses turned and went down the mountain, carrying the two tablets of thecovenant in his hands” (Exod 32:15, NRSV). Only indicate the Bible version inthe first citation; it is not necessary to identify each citation as NRSV.Assignment Expectations?Written in Times New Roman 12 point font and double spaced.?Approx. 1,000 to 1,200 words in length, plus a References page.?Paper includes an introduction and thesis statement, addresses the first three (offour) assignment questions, and engages with the required scholarly sources.?Lists references in APA format.?Contains minimal grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Part 3: Final PaperPart 3: Submit a final paper, to include the following:Revisions ?as indicated by the professor.Introduction with thesis statement.? See the APU Writing Center resources ?ThesisStatements? and ?Introductions and Conclusions? for help.Body paragraphs? that address all four assignment questions:1.How does the topic (Moses, Miriam, Covenant, the Decalogue, or the GoldenCalf) connect to the larger themes of creation, fall, and redemption within theoverarching story of the Bible?2.What is important to know about the history, culture, and/or theology surroundingthis person or concept?3.What was the original meaning of this concept or significance of this personwithin Exodus/Deuteronomy?4.What insights gained could be meaningful for our context today?Body paragraphs? embed research and analysis from scholarly sources and containin-text citations.References page,? formatted in APA style, minimally includes:?The Drama of Scripture?;?the accompanying topic article found in the course from ?Dictionary of the OldTestament: Pentateuch?;?two? additional sources from the ?APU Library?.?NOTE: In APA style, classical works – including the Bible – are ?not? listed in theReferences page. Embed biblical citations within the text as follows: “ThenMoses turned and went down the mountain, carrying the two tablets of thecovenant in his hands” (Exod 32:15, NRSV). Only indicate the Bible version inthe first citation; it is not necessary to identify each citation as NRSV.Assignment Expectations?Written in Times New Roman 12 point font and double spaced.?Approx. 1,500 words in length, plus a References page.?Paper includes an introduction and thesis statement, addresses all fourassignment questions, engages with the required scholarly sources, and includesa conclusion. See the APU Writing Center resource ?Introductions andConclusions? for help.?Incorporates improvements based on instructor feedback from Part 2.?Lists references in APA format.?Contains minimal grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Review the Grading Rubric for further details as to how your project ultimately will be scored. Signature Assignment Part 1 completed by Jamal: Project Plan Topic: Covenant 1. Introduction 1. Definition of Covenant 2. Significance of the Study 3. Definition of Terms 2. Body 1. What is a Covenant and why? How does the topic (Moses, Miriam, Covenant, the Decalogue, or the Golden Calf)connect to the larger themes of creation, fall, and redemption within the overarching story of the Bible? 2. Old Covenant, what is important to know about the history, culture, and/or theology surrounding this person or concept? 3. New Covenant what was the original meaning of this concept or significance of this person withinExodus/Deuteronomy?4.What insights gained could be meaningful for our context today? 3. Conclusion 1. Conclusion 2. Recommendations https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/ivpotp/covenant https://www.apu.edu/library/

English|The Philosophy of Composition|Get custom homework help from vetted experts in 100+ courses and programs. 24/7

English|Ship Construction|Get custom homework help from vetted experts in 100+ courses and programs. 24/7

Over the next two days your assignment is to complete a narrative essay about yourself. I am going to be grading these papers, however, I really want to see where you are in writing before we take off on our regular material. This gives me an idea of strengths and weaknesses in writing, but also helps me to get to know you all a bit better myself. There is an attached example of a narrative essay to give you some ideas. Please remember, this is FOR A GRADE, so do your very best. YOU MUST SUBMIT THIS AS A SHARED GOOGLE DOCUMENT WITH ME so that I can edit. You have until 11:59 pm Friday to complete this assignment. I will not not edit a rough draft, however, please reach out to me if needed. Those of you waiting on hot spots to complete your work, please don’t be discouraged. We will get you caught up just as soon as possible!

Outliers (2 pages) -Read one chapter that you found engaging & that you would like to dissect. -Write a brief 2 page discussion: ::Write the author’s research topic. ::Discuss, evaluate and critique the author’s research method. (In other words, how did the author conduct his study, was it a good choice, did it work, what problems did this study have?) ::Explain the authors findings, if you agree / disagree and what potential omissions there are in this study. ::Lastly, list any thoughts, questions or comments you have for the author. In short, you are writing just one response. They’re not essays. They’re more like critiques / break downs. I want to see you thinking through the research process. Additionally, for On Writing Well, make a list of the five qualities of good writing. This should be a brief list of the things you found most relevant – the five qualities of writing that you value.

5 pages Double Spaced single margined MLA Format GRADING EVALUATION FOR RESEARCH PAPER You should have a minimum of 5 references. (5 pages typed -12 font; double-spaced and with standard margins). The break down of grading is in three parts. Content is of 15 : A well written introduction 1. Brief overview of topic/issue. 2. Inclusion of a stat, case, study finding, or headline, etc. to illustrate issue, contextualize subsequent analysis and draw reader in to topic. 3. Clear thesis statement (somewhere in intro). 4. Provide the organizational structure of analysis (usually at end of intro) Body of Analysis 1. Analysis follows in a logical manner 2. good use of information/data to support ideas and support thesis statement. 3. selective use of quotes (paraphrase when possible) 4. Direct quotes should be used sparingly. 5. proper format for quotes (Quotes of 20 words or more should be dropped down and indented) Grammar and Punctuation out of 2.5 – self explanatory – run on sentences, incomplete, awkward sentences and punctuation problems. Resources – in-text citations and resources is of our of 2.5 Whether they paraphrase or directly quote, you must formally cite your sources. APA / MLA Reference/work cited page is properly formatted. And properly formatted Work Cited/Reference Page – Resources should be in alphabetical order and proper technical formatting of resources (appropriate hanging indent) All you need to do is in the comment box is provide the grade they received for each component being evaluated Only provide feedback for areas that require work. Content Grammar Resources /15 /2.5 /2.5 Attached is my outline for which you can get an idea of what the essay should be about Topic: Death Penalty. Against it Thesis: Though the death penalty was created in order to create an extreme punishment of the judiciary system, it has done the opposite by increasing the amount of costs affiliated, unfulfilling its promises of deterring murder, and has shown how barbaric of a punishment it is in this civilized society. Intro Paragraph: – Discuss general idea of the death penalty – How it came to be – The 5 W’s – Mention the initial pros and now its cons. 1st Body Paragraph: (Cost) – It is expensive – Takes way more time and effort – Extremely long process – Multiple judicial meetings (court) – Trial and execution costs as well – Can cost up to millions 2nd Body Paragraph: (It does not really deter murder) – Life imprisonment results in deterring murder as well. – It does not take account into a murderer’s actions o One murder could result in the death penalty or even 12 – There is no proper check on who the death penalty should apply towards 3rd Body Paragraph: (It is a barbaric punishment) – It is a barbaric punishment – Against all main human rights (essentially it takes them away) – Against civil principles. You cannot do exactly the same to a criminal as what crime he commits – The death penalty can be discriminatory and can target specific people such as people of race or mentally challenged individuals Conclusion: – Review all major facts and arguments from the body paragraphs. – Provide a proper rebuttal using information from the introduction – Use the thesis statement to emphasize the argument Minimum 5 references

Last names beginning with the letter M-Z will take the con. Using one of the three environmental theories discussed in Chapter 10 of the Widdows textbook, answer the following prompt: Should gas prices be higher in order to encourage the purchase of energy efficient cars? Last names M-Z will answer “no.” (Even if you personally disagree with the side to which you are assigned, you are still required to create an argument supporting it, for the purposes of this debate.) In your initial post, respond to the question according to the side of the debate you are on. Create a thesis that develops a strong argument supporting your view. Be sure to cite sources and consult outside sources/readings as well. This question is environmental, political, and financial, so the strongest responses will consider the ethics of all three factors in their answers.

focus on the similarities of neoliberalism and neorealism