English Literature

Assignment Instructions: Write a responsive essay where you complete the following tasks: 1. Provide a short overview of the story so as to provide a foundation for your response. 2. Describe (and explain in detail) the aspect of the story that stood out to you, and support those ideas with actual textual support from the story. For instance, if you choose to highlight the theme, explain what idea(s) or message(s) stood out to you, providing occasional textual evidence to support your points. 3. Provide a rationale for your ideas—also called the ‘so what.’ In other words, why is this work considered important or notable in American literature or history- and in your opinion, should it be? Why or why not? And/or, is this work of older American literature somehow relevant, in any way, to people, events, or ideas you see in American culture today? If so, explain. Requirements: •Word count: 650 words (bare minimum) or more • MLA format • Citation Requirements: You are required to quote at least twice and also paraphrase at least twice from the literature you’ve chosen to write about (your primary source). Which is Anne Bradstreet “The Vanity of all Worldly Things”

Discussion Question: This week, we are focusing on Part 2 of The Alchemist. This means you will be nearly finished with the book by the end of this week!  This week, let’s turn discussion over to each of you!  In your initial post, tell us one specific scene or moment in Part 2 that you believe to be particularly important, significant, or impactful.  Then, explain why it stands out to you and what meaning you believe it to have.  You might also think about how it fits in to the template on the hero’s journey. In your follow-up posts, reply to peers by agreeing, disagreeing, or sharing additional insight.  Together, let’s flesh out some of the more impactful moments and speculate their meanings. Be sure to be specific in your responses and elaborate with support.

Part 3 For part three of your summer assignment, you need to read Nathaniel Hawthorne’s ?The Scarlet Letter.?Afterward, I want you to write a 5-7 page essay in which you respond to the following prompt: Based on your reading of ?The Scarlet Letter?, what are Hawthorne’s views regarding Puritan religious doctrine and individual freedoms? Your essays should adhere to the following guidelines: 1. 12 – Point Times New Roman Font 2. Double Spaced 3. MLA Heading 4. You should cite the book and any other applicable sources in the body of your essay.

1. Article Summary ? Have you communicated the source’s purpose? ? Have you included all of the source’s main points? ? Have you restated the source’s argument in your own words? 2. Article Response ? Have you provided your perspective on the source’s argument? ? Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate why you either agree or disagree with the argument? 3. Reflection ? Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses? ? Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment? B. Reflection Questions DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions. What ideas originally came to mind when you first read through the article? Did your initial response to the article change after reading it for a second time? (3-4 sentences) How does paying attention to the way you respond to a source help you formulate your stance on a topic? (2-3 sentences)

This week you will begin the background reading that is necessary to complete the final Conspiracy Theory Analysis Project. To receive the final project description, you will need to complete the short survey below. In order to begin your conspiracy theory analysis project, please answer the following questions. The answers to questions 2-5 may be found in our readings for Week 6. Once you’ve submitted this brief survey, I will send you a Canvas message with details for the final project. 2. According to Kelly M. Greenhill, why do people believe in conspiracy theories in the first place? * 3. According to the NPR report, “Fake News: How to Spot Misinformation,” what are some of the factors that contribute to the spread of misinformation? 4. After viewing the Research Companion videos, describe the difference between information found on the “open web” and the information found through a physical or digital library. 5. What is the most important concept or idea you’ve learned from these readings and videos? Readings/ Videos Below: https://now.tufts.edu/articles/truth-about-conspiracy-theories https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LyymR0xrpZc https://www.npr.org/2019/10/29/774541010/fake-news-is-scary-heres-how-to-spot-misinformation

Write a 1,250-word essay on one of the topics below. You must use at least three outside sources (not including the one listed below and not including your textbook). Cite your sources according to MLA style, and please type in 12-point Times New Roman font with 1-inch page margins. Follow the formatting instructions on the Essay Reference Guide, and include a Works Cited page at the end with alphabetized entries for your outside sources and your text. Please submit your ThinkingStorm tutor’s notes alongside your final draft of Essay #4. Ultimately, there should be two documents in the Assignments folder: your tutor’s draft and your final draft. Biographical: Subject Robert Frost’s “Design” to a biographical reading. Consider its meditations on life, death, and fate (or, alternatively, the natural order of the world) and relate this to details of Frost’s life. How might his upbringing and the events in his life have influenced this poem? What does this poem teach us about Frost’s views on life? Be sure to analyze the symbolism in the poem to uncover more about the meaning of “Design” and the way Frost viewed the world.

Part 1 (only): Students will perform the following assignment:  After reading my Week 11 Lecture Script — in which I talk about “mythical symbols” as “the products of the imagination” of the Hellenic Mind — perform the following activity: give attention to the following mythical symbols which you will find in the short excerpt (the “Chorus”) for this module’s reading:   a. snake b. Heaven c. Hellas d. Peneus  e. Tempes  f. Cyclades g. Argo h. Orpheus i. Ulysses j. Calypso     Now pick at least 3 symbols from the list of symbols above– all taken from our Module 11 excerpt, Shelley’s “Chorus,” and then tell me    –  how do the symbols that you picked function to either “express,” or “realize,” or “compliment” or “prove” the utopian intention of Shelley’s first line.. “The world’s great age begins anew / The golden years return.”  Shelley, in other words, is relying on symbolic language to prove the thesis of his first line. This is just a lesson in trying to read “symbolic” (versus ordinary) language.  * you might need to do a small bit of web research (Googling) to discover what each symbolic image/ allusion basically means.

Needs to be in MLA 8th edition. And with this research paper is an argumentative paper where you are comparing the book “Where are you going, Where have you been” to literary terms. and expand off my fiction analytical essay on the book which ima upload to help out

Reading Response Papers: Oscar Wilde’s The Importance of Being Earnest  Each response should be at least 800 words (no longer than 1000 words) and double-spaced. Submit papers to the Turnitin slot on Moodle. Your paper should directly address one or more readings assigned for that week that the paper is due. You can choose to focus on a secondary (theory) reading assigned for that day, discussing how it can be used to analyze a primary reading (assigned for that week). Reading responses must not merely repeat the material discussed in lecture. We are looking for interesting and original interpretation and discussion of the material. Each response is worth 15% of the final grade, and will be graded out of 15 points. You should be quoting to support your ideas (and don’t forget to cite properly!). However, keep direct quotations short. Quote only that which is most pertinent.   **You will not be allowed to submit papers after the forum closes**   The criteria for response papers are: 1. You are required to submit TWO (2) response papers worth 15% each.  2. 800 words in length (No longer than 1000 words!). · If papers are too long or too short, ½ of a letter grade will be deducted 3. Evidence of thoughtful and critical thinking. 4. Correct and thoughtful incorporation of some of the critical/theoretical terminology. 5. Demonstration of critical engagement with the primary and/or theoretical material. 6. Ability to incorporate some of the material from the lectures. 7. Grammatically correct. 8. Although a thesis statement is not required, it is beneficial to have one. Your paper should be focussed and in well-developed paragraphs. 9. Incorporation of some textual evidence (i.e. direct quotations) from the primary and theoretical sources to support your ideas/arguments. 10. Must include works cited. If papers do not include a works cited, ½ of a letter grade will be deducted. Works cited not included in the word length restrictions. 11. Correct MLA formatting. If you do not use correct MLA formatting, ½ of a letter grade might be deducted.

Please read the file attached (do not use any other source) and answer :1) Who were the Gracchus brothers and what were they trying to achieve? What were their fates? (min. 200 words)2) “Five Good Emperors” and why they were considered so. (min. 200 words)Extra Credit: What did Augustus and his successors put everywhere? (min 100. words)B