English Literature

****The work ONLY needs to add 8 decent academic citations  (References).APA 7****Here some details about the work itself. case study,Pearson and Polden (2019, p.222) suggest that ‘sometimes hard truths need to be told for the greater good of society. Deciding whether to do so or not needs to involve an informed ethical and legal decision by the professional communicator’.Discuss and argue this statement with reference to TWO real examples/ cases from the contemporary media in Australia.** Link to find the cases http://www.austlii.edu.au/You will need to consider legal and ethical issues. Your discussion must include Media Law and Ethical principles and concepts such as contempt of court, confidentiality and sources, privacy, suppression orders, media regulation, Sub judice, discrimination, Utility, Categorical Imperative and so on.

This assignment and the ‘special assignment’ are from the same course. You could use the same readings materials that used before.BLOG #1Post here your first blog (3 blogs totally) based on your experience (Institute for food; Farm)Your BLOGS will be between 400-500 words in total, and must include the following:- A title and the date of your visit to the farm.- What you did and what you learned in the field.- Personal considerations on how the work and experience you had that day relate to one of the readings we are covering. Be specific: to what readings your work and experience made you think of, and why?- two or more photos that are descriptive or show what you did that dateThe instructions of the whole project:An essential component of this class and your grade is the Service-Learning/Experiential-Learning. Besides class meetings, part of your time and commitment in this course consists in participating to a community service-based project. After each of your service and experiential learning meetings, you will write a blog, a research paper and a reflection. To receive full grade for the experiential-learning, it is your responsibility to attend each meeting of the project with the organization you chose to work with, and to submit 3 blogs on Canvas based on your specific experience by the due date.

Rose is a character who has provoked a great deal of controversy: some see her as a strong matriarch who hold her family together, while others argue that she enables Troy’s worst behaviors. Write an essay in which you explain your view of Ross and defend your claim with direct evidence from the play. Remember to create a line of reasoning while adhering to the rules of effective writing

Write an essay exciting your opinion on whether teams are unfairly stereotyped

My motivational letter to look professional but friendly

The assignment involves data analysis using SPSS and interpretations.The data represents assessment of cardiovascular risk factors among adultsThe data should be formatted as a SPSS data file (.sav) and can be opened directly into SPSSPresent a written report in word format, both as hard and soft copy

Your essay should be typed, double-spaced, and in a font no larger than 12 pt. Times New Roman (this font).  The paper should have a title and all pages should be numbered.  A Title page and Works Cited page are not necessary.Whenever you make direct quotations from the text/primary source or use specific wording, facts, or ideas from these texts, you must cite them with footnotes or endnotes.  You are to use an abbreviated form of footnotes with the page number for example (Incidents, 45).Question: 1.    After reading the assigned pages of Incidents of a Life of a Slave Girl, please discuss what you learned about slavery in the South as far as the demands made on their labor, the liberties that were denied as far as legal marriage, learning to read and write, attending church, having time with their families, how they were punished for misconduct, how the slave community helped each other handle the brutalities of slavery or brought under government control during a slave rebellion.

Please Read the Attached Reading ( Second Treatise, Ch. 1-11; 14; 18-19) then do the following: Please make a post offering at least two thoughtful and substantive questions, reflections, or comments (QRCs) inspired by the material below. – At least one QRC must explicitly identify a passage( quote a passage and then respond to it) from the reading attached that you found intriguing, confusing, enlightening, etc. to lift up for consideration. You should quote the passage in full in your post along with a clear citation so others can easily find it in the text, and briefly explain your reasons for highlighting this passage – this can come in the form of substantive questions about, interpretations of, or challenges to the ideas expressed in the passage. For the second QRC, you may choose to lift up another passage, but you are not required to do so. Instead you may choose to offer a more general question about the ideas under consideration, a reaction to the podcast lecture, an argument you are trying to work out, or a connection you have made, or events in the world. In other words, each paper should have two clearly distinct QRCs, at least one of which lifts up a passage from the text.

Detroit Mercy’s Mission and Identity states that universities are places where students learn to “understand reality from many different perspectives.” Why do diverse perspectives matter in higher education? What perspective do you bring to Detroit Mercy?

My topic is about reputation from the three different characters John Proctor, Reverend Hale, and Abigail Williams from the story the Crucible