Education

In a two-page paper, research how physics is used in a specific profession of your choice. You should identify two physics principles used in the profession as well as explain, in detail, how they are used. Paper must have a minimum of two sources, use proper spelling and grammar, and follow APA format.

Introductory paragraph to topic (refer to the Final Paper guidelines for your topic selection). Write an introductory paragraph with at least 150 words that clearly explains the topic, the importance of further research, and ethical implications. Thesis statement. Write a direct and concise thesis statement, which will become the solution to the problem that you will argue or prove in the Week 5 Final Paper. (A thesis statement should be a concise, declarative statement. The thesis statement must appear at the end of the introductory paragraph.) Annotated bibliography. Develop an annotated bibliography to indicate the quality of the sources you have read. Summarize in your own words how the source contributes to the solution of the global societal issue for each annotation. Address fully the purpose, content, evidence, and relation to other sources you found on this topic (your annotation should be one to two paragraphs long—150 words or more. Include no less than five scholarly sources in the annotated bibliography that will be used to support the major points of the Final Paper. Demonstrate critical thinking skills by accurately interpreting evidence used to support various positions of the topic.

Describe three commonalities between the Conceptual Framework and the Professional Dispositions. Why are these commonalities important for teachers and students in the 21st century? https://www.gcu.edu/college-of-education.php https://students.gcu.edu/Documents/15GCU0264-COEProDisposition-120115_v1.pdf

Touchstone 2.1: Evaluate a Source ASSIGNMENT: For this essay, you will select one of the sources you have found through your preliminary research about your research topic. Which source you choose is up to you; however, it should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length, and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested. The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source: Provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.) You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels: Credibility: Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author’s (or sponsor’s) trustworthiness. Usefulness: Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)? Finally, you will include a conclusion which shows your final assessments on both counts. A. Assignment Guidelines DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines. 1. Source Identification The introduction of this paper will be introducing the source: ? Have you provided the author’s name? ? Have you provided the source title? ? Have you provided the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)? 2. Source Evaluation ? Have you provided a judgment on the source’s credibility? ? Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on credibility? ? Have you provided a judgment on the source’s usefulness? ? Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on usefulness? 3. Reflection ? Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses? ? Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment? B. Reflection Questions DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions. What types of questions did you ask yourself when evaluating the credibility and usefulness of your source? (2-3 sentences) How do you feel this evaluation practice will help you as you continue to move through the research process? (2-3 sentences)

Here is an outline of the paper Teacher Leadership Begins with Self-Leadership   Much of this research discusses the different leadership roles of teacher leaders can take and how these positions of leadership can influence the various stakeholders in their settings in order to make a difference.    This paper takes a different approach by focusing on the importance teacher leaders possessing strong self-leadership.    Self-leadership is an essential component of teacher leadership. To be an effective teacher leader, one must be able to lead oneself effectively.  This paper will focus on the different aspects of self-leadership as it relates to teacher leadership.   I.                    Teachers view of the education profession is the outcome of their conception of education.   II.                 Teachers manifest into their reality base on their own thoughts about themselves. Teachers are who they think they are.   III.              Self-leadership includes deciding, declaring, expressing, and experiencing who oneself.     Self-Leadership     Self-Discovery   A.    To be great leaders, we have to understand ourselves. B.     But it’s surprising how when we don’t take the time to get in touch with ourselves, we lose sight of who we really are. C.     When we’re caught up in the busy work of doing, we often either don’t notice subtle shifts in ourselves. D.    We become so focused on the work that we don’t realize when it’s leading us away from who we really are and what we truly value. Beliefs and values that make us who we are. A.    your values guide your approach to life and relationships B.      discovering them and uncovering what makes you tick C.     Being the best leaders can be means identifying what these values are and then living and leading in accordance with them. D.    When you understand what’s important to you, what energizes you, what you believe in, and where you want to be; you can make leadership decisions with confidence. E.     Great leaders in history had the courage to stand up for what they believed in because they knew what they believed in. V.    Self-Acceptance E.     Self-Acceptance is about being completely honest with yourself and accepting it without self-criticism or self-sabotage. F.      We often focus on the negatives about ourselves. G.    Self-acceptance is about recognizing where things aren’t going the way you’d like, understanding your part in that and then accepting it. H.    Self-acceptance is taking responsibility for your feelings and actions I.        Accepting what is and isn’t possible to change and developing a plan to handle things differently in the future. J.       It’s accepting that you are good enough already, but that everyone can always strive to be a little better. K.    Importantly, self-acceptance isn’t just about accepting your flaws. It’s also about accepting and owning your strengths. L.     While most people find it easy to point out their flaws, many of us struggle to openly identify our strengths. M.   When you can honestly identify what you’re good at, you can leverage that to get better results. N.    When you achieve self-acceptance, your growth comes from a less stressful place. You’re focusing on growth in the areas that matter to you, knowing that it’s essential to grow but also being comfortable with

Critical Review Template  to critically review your chosen LENGTH: 1,000 WORDS, EXCLUDING REFERENCE LIST COMPULSORY REFERENCES: ·        Kervin, L., Vialle, W., Howard, S. J., Herrington, J., & Okely, T. (2016). Research for Educators 2nd Edition: Cengage Learning Australia. ( if you can’t find it use https://books.google.com.au/books?id=kQuq9F_PltkC&pg=PA1&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false this allows you access to most of it) –         Chapters to note from this textbook:  Chapter 2, 3, 5,8) ·        Shank, G., Brown, L., & Pringle, J. (2018). Understanding Education Research: A guide to Critical Reading, Second Edition. London, Routledge.  Chapters to note from this textbook:  Chapter 1, 4 and 5, 3, 10,11, 9, 12, 13) ASSIGNMENT 1 DETAILS: REFER TO RTL 1 criteria and reference document The aim of this assessment is for you to demonstrate your ability to critically review a piece of educational research. In order to complete this assessment, you need to: – Select a research paper from those provided to you   ( titles are)   The Impact of Social Network Characteristics and Gender on Covert Bullying in Australian Students with Disability in the Middle Years ·        The impact of national standardized literacy and numeracy testing on children and teaching staff in remote Australian Indigenous communities ·        Pedagogies of performative care and school belonging: lessons from an Australian school ·        Challenging racism through schools: teacher attitudes to cultural diversity and multicultural education in Sydney, Australia – UTILISE THE TEMPLATE DOCx Read and identify the various sections of the article, including the a) review of the literature, b) research question(s), and/or aims; c) methodology, d) results and e) conclusions, and/or recommendations; – Evaluate the quality of the research paper using your textbooks and unit texts to help you make those decisions. Identify strengths and/or any gaps, oversights or general issues with the various elements of the research as presented in the article; – You must present your work professionally, demonstrating appropriate academic literacy including APA 7th edition referencing. The final section of the Critical Review Template will be your reference list

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for success Description Percentage 1: No submission 0.00 % 2: Insufficient 69.00 % 3: Approaching 74.00 % 4: Acceptable 87.00 % 5: Target 100.00 % Category 100.0           Descriptions of Historical Events and Legislative Actions [CEC 6.1, 6.2; NAEYC 6c, 6d; InTASC 9(j), 9(l), 9(o), 10(h)] 40.0 Not addressed. More than one of the descriptions of relevant historical events and legislative actions that have shaped early childhood education are presented inaccurately. At least one of the descriptions of relevant historical events and legislative actions that have shaped early childhood could be presented more fully or accurately. Includes adequate descriptions of relevant historical events and legislative actions that have shaped early childhood education. Includes accurate descriptions of relevant historical events and legislative actions that have shaped early childhood education. Importance of Historical Events and Legislative Actions [CEC 6.2, InTASC 9(o)] 30.0 Not addressed. Does not include many of the main historical events and legislative actions that have been integral in making early childhood education what it is today. Does not include enough of the historical events and legislative actions that have been integral in making early childhood education what it is today. Includes historical events and legislative actions that have been integral in making early childhood education what it is today. Includes some of the main historical events and legislative actions that have been integral in making early childhood education what it is today. Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0 Not addressed. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Argument Logic and Construction 8.0 Not addressed. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0 Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0 Not addressed. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0 Not addressed. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although several minor formatting errors are present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Total Percentage   100

Research paper. You will write an 8-12-page research paper on your approved topic. In addition to sharing your findings on this topic, your paper should discuss how this project enhances your understanding about the dynamic interplay between schools and society, note any substantive connections between your topic and the materials used in this course, and explain how this project influences your thinking about the future of schooling.

Answer the bulletin:( 3-4 power)(3-4 references) Please follow my information from the PowerPoint(Labeled Slide 1)  to go along with this final paper. Please answer all BOLD parts and align it with previous assignments.. You may use those reference or more

Use the CEC 2014 reference and you can use references from part 2 assignment to add to the power point slides. I am iddle school teacher managing minor and major disruptions… add 2 pg with is about 2-3 new slides. Make information flow part 1 and part 2 are together..which is one whole paper