Case Study

hi, I have a document that I need to be edited in like grammar and punctuation as well as revised sentences if needed. if you open the help, in this case, please leave a message. I will provide the document and the assignment so you can get an idea of what is going on.

1.  Research the financial statements for a company of your choice. a.   You can locate the annual statements (called “10-K” forms) for all public U.S. companies in the SEC’s EDGAR system. Annual statements will often include commentary explaining recent financial changes and events. b.   Many free financial websites, such as Morningstar, provide financial data and ratios for public companies. Search for your company on Morningstar and then select “Operating Performance” for a list of ratios for previous years. c.    Consider accessing company reports through OCLS using the Business Insights: Essentials tool. Detailed financial and investment reports are available for hundreds of companies. 2.  Prepare a paper analyzing the company’s past three years of financial results: a.   Begin by creating a table listing at least 10 financial ratios for the last three years (three years trend, 10 ratios, 30 ratios total). You can either calculate these ratios yourself using the financial data found, or use the ratios you find from your sources. b.   The ratios you study are up to you. Use whatever ratios you find most revealing. However, you should include return on equity (ROE) and its three components: total asset turnover, profit margin, and financial leverage (asset/equity or debt/equity).  c.    Evaluate and comment on any interesting trends you find. What ratios have changed significantly over the past three years? What does this indicate? Do the ratios suggest financial strength? What potential weaknesses do you see? What could the company do to improve these ratios? d.   Conclude with a recommendation, based on your analysis, as to whether the company is prepared to take on a large growth opportunity. 3.  Be sure to provide a detailed recommendation that demonstrates your critical thinking and understanding of financial analysis. 4.  Prepare your paper in Microsoft Word in a professional manner, using proper spelling, grammar, and APA style. Include a reference list. Be sure to appropriately cite your sources for your financial data and any commentary or analysis you rely upon.

Please read the case of Palko v. Connecticut (1937). it’s a very important case in terms of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties. Brief this case following Instructions found in your Module “HOW-TO-BRIEF-A-CASE: SAMPLE & INSTRUCTIONS.”  N.B.: READ THE INSTRUCTIONS ON “How To Brief A Case” above. The case, Palko v. Connecticut (1937), is found on pp. 60-61 of your Textbook. You can also click above on “CRJU 3520-Palko v Connecticut” to read the case. VERY IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS: When posting your case brief, please do NOT post it as an attachment. If you type it as a Word document, copy and paste it into the Thread, that is, the Big Box, and then click on “Post.” All your discussion assignments MUST be typed or pasted into the Thread. NO ATTACHMENTS, PLEASE. INSTRUCTIONS ON BRIEFING CASES     In analyzing a legal case, you have to present a brief. The instructions below will guide you in doing your case (legal) brief.               FIRAC: FACTS-ISSUE-RULE OF LAW-ANALYSIS-CONCLUSION:                                     HOW TO BRIEF A CASE 1.      (F) State the facts of the case (a brief summary of what the case is about,    i.e., what happened?)   2.      (I) State the Issue/Issues in the case (What are the legal issues in the case? Sometimes there may be only one legal issue)     3.      (R) State the Rule of Law that applies to this case (What law applies to this case? What does the law say about cases of this nature?).   4.      (A) Analysis of the legal argument/arguments in the case (analyze the arguments/ decisions/opinions of the justices.   5.      (C)  Conclusion (do you agree with the Court’s arguments/decision/opinion in this case?). If yes, why? And if not, why not?   Your Legal Brief should be between 3 and 5 pages.  If you decide to use other sources to support your opinion, sources such as the Internet, books or articles, please make sure that you document or cite the sources to avoid plagiarism. Remember to give credit for an idea or opinion that is NOT originally yours. In citing your sources, please use the APA Style (See your Course Syllabus about the APA Style of Writing).

After providing your report to the professor in Assignment 2, the country’s governing body asks you to return to the country and testify in the court proceedings. While you are abroad, your professor asks you to report on the court proceedings and correctional system. Write a 3–5 page paper in which you: Analyze both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Provide support for the analysis. Assuming the accused is ultimately sentenced to a term of imprisonment, depict the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Provide justification for your view of the country’s prison system. Expose two ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems. Provide one correctional intervention that has been effective in the U.S. criminal justice system and explain how that intervention would have an impact on your elected foreign case. Provide justification for the intervention. Use at least four quality references. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not count as quality references.

As a school counselor in regular secondary school. You have to design your study about a student who is facing one of the possible problems at school (choose one problem only): Depression Bullying Anxiety Eating Disorders Chronic Illnesses: Diabetes, Asthma etc… Social Withdrawal In your study you have to also provide the following: • History of the client, • Current problems; • Suggested Solutions: Cognitive and Behavioral Techniques; • Procedures: Identifying Triggering Thoughts, List of negative thoughts List of positive thoughts, Using your thoughts to change your mood; how your thoughts affect your mood, working with the ABC method; how your activities affect your mood, personal goals. • Transcript: Excerpts of three therapy sessions for a group of three and two excerpts for a group of two.

Analyze the case with the framework and concepts. Show reasoning and analyze the case. briefly summarize the situation and analyze the case. breadth(have all relevant issues been covered?) depth(have the most important issues been given sufficient consideration?) competency(are the arguments clear, logical, persuasive?)

This paper requires you to make a practical and reasoned evaluation of the problems and opportunities you have identified from the case material. Read the questions carefully and answer ALL the questions as specified. Candidates must adopt a REPORT FORMAT. Those who do not will be penalised.

This case study provides you with the opportunity to synthesize and apply the concepts learned in this course to analyze real-world business cases. The case study will improve your understanding and ability to think critically about the importance of building a better world through strategic partnerships. Websites Lilly | Improving Global Health  (Links to an external site.) Lilly Improving Access to Quality Healthcare in Limited Resource Settings  (Links to an external site.) AMPATH and Lilly Partnership  (Links to an external site.) For nearly a century the pharmaceutical company, Eli Lilly, has been forming alliances with over one hundred partners around the world devoted to discovery, development, and marketing. One of those partners is The Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH). AMPATH was created in response to the HIV crisis in Western Kenya in 2001. It was built on a partnership with Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, the Moi University School of Medicine in Eldoret, Kenya, and a consortium of North American academic health centers, led by Indiana University. AMPATH has continually expanded its successful HIV approach to include more diseases, including diabetes, hypertension and cancer. By 2002, Eli Lilly had already donated nearly sixty million dollars’ worth of medicines to help improve the lives of these patients. In 2009, it launched the AMPATH Oncology Institute with only a single physician and nurse. Since many people in Kenya live in poverty there is a major lack of access to quality healthcare and with only two cancer centers for the country’s 42 million people; screening, diagnosis, treatment and palliative care for cancer are in very scarce supply. Using public/private partnerships the institute has been able to expand its staff and services to include 10 clinicians, six core nurses and an oncology pharmacist, however, the demand still outweighs the supply. In February 2015, the Eli Lilly Foundation announced an additional commitment of one million dollars to help equip a new oncology center, hire additional staff and train local healthcare professionals. The result of this partnership has helped many, many people. Critical Thinking Discussion The alliance between Eli Lilly and AMPATH is an example of two organizations strategically partnering together to make a difference in building a better tomorrow. For this critical thinking discussion: Research and provide an example of the alliance of two organizations (even Eli Lilly and other service organizations). Another example of an alliance of two organizations is Giving Tuesday  (Links to an external site.) ; Giving Tuesday | About  (Links to an external site.) . Discuss the results of how the alliances work together to make a difference in building a better tomorrow Formatting Your APA-formatted report for this case must be at least 500 words and must include the following headings: Overview: Provide an overview of the two organizations and their alliance in building a better tomorrow. Critical Thinking Discussion: Discuss your findings from your research of 1. and 2. above. Debrief: Share your thoughts, opinions, and any action that you may take to build a better tomorrow based on reflection of your research.

Q1: Paul steals an expensive watch from the local jewelry store. He knows that Ken needs a watch. At the time Paul stole the watch, he intended to sell it to Ken. As he is leaving the jewelry store, he is apprehended by police. Paul begs for mercy. He states that he has an agreement to sell any watch that he may steal to Ken. The police tell Paul that if he cooperates, his sentence will be lighter. They give the watch back to Paul. Paul meets Ken and shows Ken the watch. Paul tells Ken the watch is stolen. Ken buys the watch. -Could Ken be convicted of receiving stolen property? Is Paul guilty of larceny? Explain your reasoning. Q2: Define larceny and embezzlement. Are both of these crimes considered theft? Why or why not? What are the differences between larceny and embezzlement? Why are the differences important? Q3: What is computer crime? What are examples of this type of crime? Provide a short description of one of the early cases of computer crime. Explain at least two federal statutes which are relevant to crimes committed with or against computer equipment. Describe the four elements of computer tampering. Q4: You have been asked to serve on a special citizen committee designed to provide lawmakers with feedback on the legalization of victimless crimes. You are specifically asked whether or not you think these types of crimes should be legalized. What is your answer? How would you justify your answer?

Requirements: Provide a detailed case analysis using APA format-title page, references and in-text citations. Submit the assignment in Blackboard as a Word document.