Biology

Wingless/Wnt. The questions have to be answered according to the maximum limit of lines proposed in the answer sheet (None is more than 8 lines, while the average number of lines per answer is 3). Please note that you can deduce the questions from the questionnaire, however the text found in the questionnaire IS NOT THE ANSWERS.

The referencing has to be vancouver I have written about 1300 words of it and I want you to add words to reach 2000 ,please .as well as editting the whole report (scientifically and other aspects such as grammar , etc.) I have attached the part of report that I have already written There are some instructions that should be observed and I have attached the files.

Microbiology students will identify the genus and species of one unknown bacterium using morphological, biochemical and physiological characteristics, along with the analysis of a 16S rRNA gene sequence. The report will identify the organism, discuss the results of the microscopic examination, explain the significance of the 16S rRNA gene sequence, provide important background information, describe any inconsistent results, and use appropriate references. A Flow Chart describing the identification process is a significant portion of the report and must support the final identification. The unknown report will consist of three sections and all sections must be present to receive full credit. Each section should be introduced with the appropriate heading in bold type. The maximum length of the report is 3-pages double-spaced (12 pt s t a n d a r d business font). Students must appropriately cite any references using the APA method or ASM citation-sequence system in Section III.

Essays should be a minimum of 1500 words without exceeding 2500 words. The focus of the presentation should be on microbiology.  Apply the concepts and vocabulary you learn in class to your specific microbe.  The majority of the paper should focus on how the microbe lives, how it infects the host, and how it is able to cause disease – which necessarily means that you must explain, in detail, your pathogen’s specific molecular mechanisms of pathogenicity!   How is the microorganism transmitted to the host?  What is the preferred portal of entry?  How does the pathogen set up the initial infection?  What conditions are required for growth of the microbe?  How does the disease progress? How does the pathogen penetrate or evade the host defenses, and how does it damage host cells?  What symptoms and signs are usually present in the host?  What treatments are effective against the microbe (if you list a drug as a potential treatment, describe its molecular mechanism of action, if known)?  How might the disease be prevented?  Try to focus on the microbiology of the pathogen and its characteristics emphasizing the molecular mechanisms that are involved as much as possible.  Specific Paper Guidelines Your paper should focus on the many important and famous aspects of your microbe, including (as appropriate) the following: Modern discovery Description  Pathogenesis  Virulence factors – molecular mechanisms or putative* molecular mechanisms of pathogenicity (read Chapter 15, Microbial Mechanisms of Pathogenicity, in your lecture textbook, for more information). Treatment with emphasis upon the molecular mechanisms of pathogenicity Epidemiology Prevention *The word putative is used to describe an entity or a concept that is based on what is generally accepted or inferred even without a direct proof of it.

Any examples?Web 2.0 tools can be used as a tool to engage college students in their courses. Create a list of 10 Web 2.0 tools that you would consider using in your college classroom. Cite where the tool came from and give a 50-100-word description of what the tool is and how you would consider using it.

Answer the following TWO questions in 300 words or less. You may choose to divide the questions into two responses or fold the two questions into one essay response. Cite both our text and the Frontline piece OR the NYT piece about supplements in your discussion. INCLUDE A REFERENCE LIST in APA format1. What is your understanding of opinion and fact.  -How are opinion and fact about supplements explored in the Frontline or NYT piece?Choose ONE of Ruggerio’s 6 Key Principles for Thinking and explore how the scientists look at the issueOur skill sets as health professionals.-What is an issue that may come up in your current (or goal) health care profession area that could involve an issue of opinion/fact?-How do your clients/patients/customers rely on your judgment?

Review the American Heart Association’s  https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/heart-attack. Research the Internet about a problem that occurs with the cardiovascular system. For your first post, write a description about the disease/disorder you chose. What are some of the symptoms? Is it treatable/curable? If so, how? Is it genetic or caused by something environmental? Why did you choose this particular problem? Does it affect a particular group of individuals more than others? Etc? Do you have any personal experience with this problem? List at least one source other than the AHA’s website.

How do our microflora affect us? Be sure to do the following before starting your discussion: Go  to http://commonfund.nih.gov/hmp/index and learn about Human Microbiome Project. Go to https://www.bbc.com/news/health-18422288 and listen to the BBC radio program on Human Microbiomes. Read these articles: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/19/science/studies-of-human-microbiome-yield-new-insights.html?emc=eta1 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/19/magazine/say-hello-to-the-100-trillion-bacteria-that-make-up-your-microbiome.html?pagewanted%3Dall Based what you have learned from the website, article, and attached documents about microflora, write a two paragraph discussion on how microflora influence our health and what can we do to sustain a healthy microflora in our body Using 5 or more words from another source without quoting and referencing it is considered plaigarism and will result in a zero grade earned for the assignment. Use APA formatting and at least two references.

M3 Writing Analysis You are a doctor in a hospital, and a patient is experiencing trouble with her skin repairing itself from a cut. The patient is also expecting a child, but the cells in the reproduction development are experiencing malfunction in cell division. Describe the stages of each type of cell reproduction process from a normal patient whose body cells can repair themselves and normal cell division during the reproductive development of the unborn baby. Explain the disadvantages and advantages of each type of cell division. Discuss how the patient experiencing problems with the cells repairing from the cut and the child’s reproduction development malfunctions can alter haploid and diploid cell development. IMPORTANT: Additional resources are welcomed for more support, but the grade associated with the information from the book designated for this class will be the measurement tool to assess your paper. Please review the “plagiarism” screencast below. This will assist with plagiarism flags from your writing assignments. Turnitin is a plagiarism tool used to detect word for word verbiage online. https://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/cFhn0fbrZ8 Per Ashworth College’s policy, a 70 is the highest grade received for a 2nd submission. Length/Formatting Instructions Length 1000 Words Font 12 point , Calibri Font, no more than 1″ margins Program/File Type Submit in Word Attachments Should be pasted into the Word document if possible. Referencing system APA referencing system is necessary in assignments, especially material copied from the Internet. For examples of correct citations, visit the following links: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/

Develop a response to the following questions. Ensure you have answered all questions completely. Complete this assignment using complete sentences in a paragraph format, and be sure to check your spelling when complete. Humans have benefited from an overall warmer climate over the past millennia. However, among the majority of scientists there is deep concern over the changes in climate as a result of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. Many scientists and non-scientists advocate a rapid shift to energy sources that contribute less carbon dioxide and methane to the atmosphere. (Note: Methane is also a greenhouse gas, its effects on atmospheric warming are greater per molecule, but the warming effects do not last as long). Conversely, there are many politicians and a few scientists who do not think that carbon dioxide emission is a threat to the planet. Some of these people refute the claim of human activity being responsible for change in climate and point to how climate has always fluctuated throughout the life of planet Earth. 1. Locate a recent (last 2 years) news article related to climate change. Please pick a substantial article, not a short note/news flash, or you will not have enough material to work with to successfully answer the questions. Post the title and source immediately on discussion board so that others do not choose the same article. 2. Summarize the article: In your summary, be sure to address whether the article is consistent with the view of most scientists, maintains a point of view that climate change either is not occurring or is not important, or makes some effort to “balance” these. Take a position like the reviewers of the articles you read on the health-news site for Discussion 1. Use their criteria and evaluate the chosen article for journalistic credibility (if you have chosen an actual publication from a peer-reviewed journal then you will evaluate for scientific credibility). 3. What are the major human activities that contribute to carbon dioxide increase in the atmosphere? 4. What is the key difference between past climate change on our planet and current climate change on our planet. 5. Which of the many potential negative effects of rapid climate change do you believe will have the greatest economic costs in the U.S.? Which things will have the greatest economic costs in less developed regions of the world? 6. Science can help us understand what is occurring in our bodies and on our planet. What will be done in response to the science depends on political will, and at least to some extent in the Western world, to public opinion. Consider how we allot federal and state resources to disease prevention or cure and use this idea to come up with 5 key things you think our country should do now in response to the current science of climate change. Consider how these funding allotments might affect you now, versus how doing or not doing these things might affect your grandchildren in 20 or 30 years.