Applied Sciences

SURVEYING THE LANDSCAPE Contributing productively to a conversation—academic or otherwise—means first looking to see what others in the conversation have said and developing something worthwhile to contribute; in these regards, you’ve mostly done your homework (figuratively and literally). But making your case successfully requires more than simply writing whatever pops into your head.   REVIEW  Earlier in the semester, we read Chapter 2: Rhetorical Analysis in Critical Reading, Critical Writing: A Handbook to Understanding College Composition. Back then, the point was to learn to read texts in context—to comprehend not only the words on the page but also the circumstances in which the text was produced, including the context it was written in, the audience it was written for, and the writer’s purpose in relation to that audience. This time around, we will revisit thinking rhetorically (thinking in terms of audience, purpose, and context), though with the intention of better understanding the rhetorical situation of your own project so that you might craft your essay to give it the best possible chance of success. If necessary to refresh your memory, review/reread Chapter 2  (Links to an external site.)  in Critical Reading, Critical Writing: A Handbook to Understanding College Composition. WATCH Watch the video, “What is Rhetoric”  (Links to an external site.) ; some of it will be review from the first unit, but most of it will help you in the next step below.  WRITE Write a 1-2-page reflection in which you break down your rhetorical situation accordingly: The context of your project: What various disciplines do the researchers writing about your topic publish their work in? What are the aims of those disciplines, and what issues, challenges, or controversies are those disciplines contending with? Which journals were your sources published in, and what are the particular interests of those journals? More broadly, what relevant issues, challenges, or controversies are taking place in the world outside of the scholarly communities you’ve invested? Your audience: Whom among the scholarly communities you mentioned above do you hope to reach with your project? What matters to them, and what do they currently know, think, or believe about your topic? Your purpose: What would you like the audience you identified for the bullet above to think, feel, or do about your topic as a result of reading your essay? What claim will you be making that they might potentially disagree with, and what competing claims will you have to contend with? Your strategy: In what ways might your audience object to your claim, and how might you address those objections? In what ways might you best appeal to your readers to persuade them of your claim? How might you best connect your claim with what matters to your audience? Where is the strength of your argument, and how might you emphasize that strength through the framing and execution of your essay? What kinds of appeals would your audience most likely find persuasive and how might you craft your essay to best meet their expecations? Requirements: Word doc, double spaced, 12pt font

Analyze the attached case study:1. Identify the most important facts surrounding the case.2. Identify the key issue or issues.3. Specify alternative courses of action.4. Evaluate each course of action.5. Recommend the best course of action.So, you may ask “what does each step involve?”1. Identify the most important facts surrounding the case. Read the case several times to become familiar with the information it contains. Pay attention to the information in any accompanying exhibits, tables, or figures. Many case scenarios, as in real life, present a great deal of detailed information. Some of these facts are more relevant than others for problem identification.2. Identify the key issue or issues.Use the facts provided by the case to identify the key issue or issues facing the company you are studying. Many cases present multiple issues or problems. Identify the most important and separate them from more trivial issues. State the major problem or challenge.3. Specify alternative courses of action. List the courses of action the higher education institution can take to solve its problem or meet the challenge it faces.4. Evaluate each course of action. Evaluate each alternative using the facts and issues you identified earlier, given the conditions and information available. Identify the costs and benefits of each alternative. Ask yourself “what would be the likely outcome of this course of action? State the risks as well as the rewards associated with each course of action.5. Recommend the best course of action. State your choice for the best course of action and provide a detailed explanation of why you made this selection. You may also want to provide an explanation of why other alternatives were not selected. Your final recommendation should flow logically from the rest of your case analysis and should clearly specify what assumptions were used to shape your conclusion

In a well-organized, 2 to 3-page essay discuss the case of Perin v. Hayne. Be sure to discuss the court’s reasoning and ruling on each of the four legal theories. Why did the court have no occasion to decide whether failure to advise the plaintiff of the risk of nerve injury raised a negligence issue?

Explain the doctrine of transferred intent. What crimes does it apply to? Why is it important? What is meant by “corpus delicti?” Explain how a defendant may be prosecuted for murder when the victim’s body has not been found. To reduce murder to manslaughter, courts generally hold that what four requirements be met? Define, compare, and contrast the crimes of voluntary and involuntary manslaughter. Provide an example of each. What is the heat of passion manslaughter? What are its requirements?

The purpose of this assignment is for students to provide a quick “3-2-1” reflection on the module material and how they were able to achieve the module learning objectives.  This assignment is constructed in a blog format but is not a traditional blog. Assignment: Respond to the following “3-2-1” Question Prompts in reference to defining criminology and understanding the importance of studying crime: Share 3 things that you learned from this module, or that you found interesting. Share 2 things that were muddled, or you did not quite understand. Share 1 “Ah-Ha” moment that you experienced during this module.  This should be something that may have surprised you. Power Point Presentation Foundations to Law , Lecture Notes Foundations to Law and Crime  Lecture Notes Foundations to Law, and Crime – Alternative Formats, Power Point Presentation: Constitution, Lecture Notes: Constitution,Youtube Video: 10 Rules for Dealing with Police 

In a well-organized, two to three-page essay, discuss the case of NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS ET AL. v. SEBELIUS. Be sure to include who benefited by this decision and what negative consequences might follow. Requirements: Minimum of 750 words. APA format

A very common which is asked by every candidate from their interviewer or employer is that why should we hire you, what makes you unique, why would you be a good fit for this position, and what benefits you are going to give to our company? After applying for a job with an attractive cv by a cv expert Dubai, a lot of job interviews can land. And you should be ready for it. If you face any of these questions mentioned, you need to know how you are going to answer those. You need to convince your employer that you are the best for this position, you can do the work and deliver the results which can benefit the company in many ways. You need to convince them you possess a combination of skills and you are a multi-talented person that will make you stand out from the crowd.

For this assignment, you will create an implementation plan for a contemporary public health issue initiative. Begin by selecting a contemporary health issue of your choice (e.g., global health threats, disease outbreaks, chronic diseases, natural or man-made disasters, health disparities, ethical concerns in public health, public workforce challenges).Next, in your implementation plan, address the components listed below.a) Describe the contemporary health issue that you selected as your introduction.b) Explain whether or not the issue is influenced by lifestyle choices.c) Discuss one initiative that you would want to propose in order to improve this contemporary health issue.d) Explain how you will ensure ethical consideration when designing the implementation plan for your initiative.e) List the various stakeholders, and describe what role each position might play in each phase of the implementation.f) Discuss the training and professional development needs of stakeholders.g) Include one leadership theory that supports your implementation plan.Your plan should be a minimum of two pages in length, not counting the title and reference pages. Support your plan with at least two peer review scholar articles from an Online Library. The assignment must follow APA guidelines.

You are the Executive Housekeeper for an 800-room high-end hotel in New York City. You saw a news report aboutundercover reporters checking into hotel rooms and testing9.99the rooms for cleanliness. You want to evaluate yourhousekeeping department to make sure your housekeepersare meeting hotel standards for cleanliness.Evaluate your quality control program in the housekeepingdepartment in 700 to 1,050 words.Describe your quality control program for room cleanlinessExplain how you will testthe success or failure of yourprogramExplain service recovery and how you will address customercomplaints about cleanlinessDescribe how workforce planning and optimization willimpact your programDescribe how your program will impact thehotel’s profitmarginsClick on the Assignment Files tab to submit your audit.

1.  What are the differences between food intoxication and food infection? Explain this distinction in detail. 2.   Provide at least three specific examples of each. Each example should include: *The specific organism *The disease and its symptoms *Patient outcome if left untreated