[Get Solution] Bad Person Paper

This paper requires you to look at either a historical person or fictional character to evaluate, whom according to one of the theories we have read would be a “bad person.” Most people would agree that Hitler was a “bad” person. My point is that you ought not pick people whom others regard as bad, but whom others regard as good. For example, most people think that Cesar Chavez, or Gandhi was a good person, given their contributions to the world. People also think Batman, and Spiderman are “good.” But in thinking about theories we have read in example to name a few: Utilitarianism, Consequentialism, Deontology, Social Contract, etc. whom is valued or honored by society but would be “bad” according to a specific Philosophical theory? Be sure to pick only one historical or fictional character to analyze and one Philosophical theory to analyze. You only have 5 pages to make your point, so to go into depth requires analysis and research of both philosophical theory and historical and fictional character. We will examine historically significant ethical/moral theorists: Choose one person to evaluate (1500 words minimum) on a person (fictional or historical) who you believe to be a bad person based on that philosopher’s views.  Answer two questions:  What is the key parts of the philosopher’s moral theory that is relevant to your analysis?  Why is this person bad on that moral theory?