Assignment: Developmental Assessment

Assignment: Developmental Assessment
Assignment: Developmental Assessment
Permalink:
The needs of the pediatric patient differ depending on age, as do the stages of development and the expected assessment findings for each stage. In a 600-700-word paper, examine the needs of a school-aged child between the ages of 5 and 12 years old and discuss the following:
Compare the physical assessments among school-aged children. Describe how you would modify assessment techniques to match the age and developmental stage of the child.
Choose a child between the ages of 5 and 12 years old. Identify the age of the child and describe the typical developmental stages of children that age.
Applying developmental theory based on Erickson, Piaget, or Kohlberg, explain how you would developmentally assess the child. Include how you would offer explanations during the assessment, strategies you would use to gain cooperation, and potential findings from the assessment.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
The needs of the pediatric patient differ depending on age, as do the stages of development and the expected assessment findings for each stage. In a 600-700-word paper, examine the needs of a school-aged child between the ages of 5 and 12 years old and discuss the following:
Compare the physical assessments among school-aged children. Describe how you would modify assessment techniques to match the age and developmental stage of the child.
Choose a child between the ages of 5 and 12 years old. Identify the age of the child and describe the typical developmental stages of children that age.
Applying developmental theory based on Erickson, Piaget, or Kohlberg, explain how you would developmentally assess the child. Include how you would offer explanations during the assessment, strategies you would use to gain cooperation, and potential findings from the assessment.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Developmental Assessment and the School-Aged Child – Rubric
Collapse All Developmental Assessment And The School-Aged Child – RubricCollapse All
Comparison of Physical Assessment Among School-Aged Children
27.5 points
Criteria Description
Comparison of Physical Assessment Among School-Aged Children
5. 5: Excellent
27.5 points
A detailed comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is presented. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is thoroughly described. Insight is demonstrated into the physical assessment of school age children.
4. 4: Good
24.48 points
A comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is presented. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is described. Some information is needed for clarity.
3. 3: Satisfactory
21.73 points
A general comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is summarized. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is generally described. More information or support is needed for clarity or accuracy.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
20.63 points
An incomplete comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is summarized. How assessment techniques would be modified depending on the age and developmental stage of the child is omitted or contains significant inaccuracies.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A comparison of physical assessments among different school-aged children is omitted.
Typical Assessment for a Child of a Specific Age
27.5 points
Criteria Description
Typical Assessment for a Child of a Specific Age
5. 5: Excellent
27.5 points
The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is accurately and thoroughly described.
4. 4: Good
24.48 points
The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is described. The overall description is accurate. Some information is needed for clarity.
3. 3: Satisfactory
21.73 points
The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is generally described. The description contains some inaccuracies for the age of the child.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
20.63 points
The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is summarized. The summary contains significant inaccuracies for the age of the child.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The typical developmental stage of a child between the ages 5 and 12 is not described.
Developmental Assessment of a Child Using a Developmental Theory (Erickson, Piaget, Kohlberg)
33 points
Criteria Description
Developmental Assessment of a Child Using a Developmental Theory (Erickson, Piaget, Kohlberg)
5. 5: Excellent
33 points
A child assessment based on a developmental theory is thoroughly described. Well-developed strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are all accurate and described in detail.
4. 4: Good
29.37 points
A child assessment based on a developmental theory is described. Appropriate strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are described. Some information is needed for clarity.
3. 3: Satisfactory
26.07 points
A child assessment based on a developmental theory is generally described. General strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are summarized. There are minor inaccuracies.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
24.75 points
A child assessment based on a developmental theory is partially summarized. Partial strategies to gain cooperation and for how explanations would be offered during the assessment are presented. The potential findings expected from the assessment are omitted or are incorrect. There are significant inaccuracies.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A child assessment based on a developmental theory is omitted.
Thesis Development and Purpose
5.5 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. 5: Excellent
5.5 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. 4: Good
4.9 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. 3: Satisfactory
4.35 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.13 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
5.5 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. 5: Excellent
5.5 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. 4: Good
4.9 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. 3: Satisfactory
4.35 points
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.13 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. 5: Excellent
5.5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. 4: Good
4.9 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
3. 3: Satisfactory
4.35 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.13 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
2.2 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. 5: Excellent
2.2 points
All format elements are correct.
4. 4: Good
1.96 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. 3: Satisfactory
1.74 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
1.65 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
3.3 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. 5: Excellent
3.3 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. 4: Good
2.94 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. 3: Satisfactory
2.61 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
2.47 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Total 110 points

Struggling to find relevant content? Order a custom essay on
Assignment: Developmental Assessment
Let our experts save you the hassle
Order Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with GPA Fix
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
We appreciate every review and are always looking for ways to grow. See what other students think about our do my paper service.
Management
Comprehensively done. Thank you
Customer 452583, July 20th, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Good Work!
Customer 452587, September 2nd, 2021
Political science
THANK YOU
Customer 453001, April 25th, 2024
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Thanks for the paper.
Customer 452701, September 15th, 2023
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Thanks for your support.
Customer 452701, May 10th, 2023
ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE
EXCELLENT
Customer 452813, June 19th, 2022
Nursing
This is great! Thank you
Customer 452679, December 16th, 2021
Human Resources Management (HRM)
Thank you very much.
Customer 452701, September 10th, 2023
Social Work and Human Services
Great Work!
Customer 452587, September 8th, 2021
Nursing
All points covered perfectly! Great price!
Customer 452707, March 12th, 2023
Other
NICE
Customer 452813, June 25th, 2022
ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE
great
Customer 452813, June 26th, 2022
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Good News ! We now help with PROCTORED EXAM. Chat with a support agent for more information